Perceptual load corresponds with factors known to influence visual search.

One account of the early versus late selection debate in attention proposes that perceptual load determines the locus of selection. Attention selects stimuli at a late processing level under low-load conditions but selects stimuli at an early level under high-load conditions. Despite the successes of perceptual load theory, a noncircular definition of perceptual load remains elusive. We investigated the factors that influence perceptual load by using manipulations that have been studied extensively in visual search, namely target-distractor similarity and distractor-distractor similarity. Consistent with previous work, search was most efficient when targets and distractors were dissimilar and the displays contained homogeneous distractors; search became less efficient when target-distractor similarity increased irrespective of display heterogeneity. Importantly, we used these same stimuli in a typical perceptual load task that measured attentional spillover to a task-irrelevant flanker. We found a strong correspondence between search efficiency and perceptual load; stimuli that generated efficient searches produced flanker interference effects, suggesting that such displays involved low perceptual load. Flanker interference effects were reduced in displays that produced less efficient searches. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that search difficulty, as measured by search intercept, has little bearing on perceptual load. We conclude that rather than be arbitrarily defined, perceptual load might be defined by well-characterized, continuous factors that influence visual search.

[1]  M. Gardner,et al.  USING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS , 1987, The Lancet.

[2]  E. Vogel,et al.  Visual Search Demands Dictate Reliance upon Working Memory Storage , 2011 .

[3]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[4]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  W. Cowan,et al.  Distractor Heterogeneity versus Linear Separability in Colour Visual Search , 1996 .

[7]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[8]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[9]  G. Mangun,et al.  Perceptual Load and Visuocortical Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Sensory-Level Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[10]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[11]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  S. Kastner,et al.  Stimulus context modulates competition in human extrastriate cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  G. Woodman,et al.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[18]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[19]  John M Henderson,et al.  The Role of Meaning in Contextual Cueing: Evidence from Chess Expertise , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks , 1990 .

[21]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Jeff F. Miller The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Daryl E. Wilson,et al.  Practice in visual search produces decreased capacity demands but increased distraction , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  The perception of multiple objects , 1991 .

[26]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  W. Cowan,et al.  Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.

[29]  W. Johnston,et al.  Levels of selection and capacity limits. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention , 2010, Vision Research.

[31]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[32]  Ana Torralbo,et al.  Perceptual-Load-Induced Selection as a Result of Local Competitive Interactions in Visual Cortex , 2008, Psychological science.

[33]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[34]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[38]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[39]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.