A qualitative framework for data collection and analysis in Participation processes

Participation processes (PPs) are more and more requested in different areas given their capability to promote constructive exchange and innovative ideas and to bring a great value to decision-making processes. PPs aim to generate new data that decision-makers can consider and transform into relevant knowledge to support their decision-making processes. In some cases, collecting data could be problematic since stakeholders might lack willingness, capacity and/or suitable means to participate. In other cases, PPs might generate a large amount of data to be analyzed and scrutinized. At the same time, PPs are subject to time-effectiveness pressures to provide timely reports. Based on a case study and using the grounded theory method, we propose in this paper a qualitative framework to guide data collection and analysis in PPs in order to better inform decision-makers.

[1]  Steven Masvaure,et al.  Elusive Public Participation: Citizen Decision-Making in Budget Formulation Process in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe , 2016 .

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[3]  P. Lehoux,et al.  The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[4]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook , 1999 .

[5]  L. Bingham,et al.  The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government , 2005 .

[6]  Kaifeng Yang,et al.  Creating Public Value and Institutional Innovations across Boundaries: An Integrative Process of Participation, Legitimation, and Implementation , 2016 .

[7]  C. Wiener,et al.  Making Teams Work in Conducting Grounded Theory , 2007 .

[8]  Seeta Peña Gangadharan,et al.  Public Participation and Agency Discretion in Rulemaking at the Federal Communications Commission , 2009 .

[9]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Nancy Bouchard,et al.  The dark side of public participation: Participative processes that legitimize elected officials’ values , 2016 .

[12]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Sehl Mellouli,et al.  Towards a Context-based Citizen Participation Approach: a Literature Review of Citizen Participation Issues and a Conceptual Framework , 2017, ICEGOV.

[14]  A. Verbruggen,et al.  Analytic framework for assessing participation processes and outcomes of climate change adaptation tools , 2017, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[15]  R. Hays,et al.  Community Activists’ Perceptions of Citizenship Roles in an Urban Community: A Case Study of Attitudes That Affect Community Engagement , 2007 .

[16]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[17]  Dorothy M. Daley.  Public Participation and Environmental Policy: What Factors Shape State Agency's Public Participation Provisions? , 2008 .

[18]  Solange Nadeau,et al.  Assessing the effects of public participation processes from the point of view of participants: significance, achievements, and challenges , 2010 .

[19]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[20]  Stuart Shapiro,et al.  Does the amount of participation matter? Public comments, agency responses and the time to finalize a regulation , 2008 .

[21]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Using grounded theory method in information systems: the researcher as blank slate and other myths , 2013, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  A. Bath,et al.  Public versus expert opinions regarding public involvement processes used in resource and wildlife management , 2010 .

[23]  Juliet M. Corbin,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2008 .

[24]  Kelley O'Reilly,et al.  Demystifying Grounded Theory for Business Research , 2012 .

[25]  Bianca Radu,et al.  Citizen Participation in the Decision Making Process at Local and County Levels in the Romanian Public Instituitons , 2010 .

[26]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Business & Management , 2008 .

[27]  Clifford P. McCue,et al.  Professional service acquisition in public sector procurement , 2006 .

[28]  J. Mustajoki,et al.  How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach , 2015 .

[29]  Kevin Keasey,et al.  Patient and Public Participation in the English NHS: An assessment of experimental implementation processes , 2015 .

[30]  M. Stern,et al.  Perceptions of Legally Mandated Public Involvement Processes in the U.S. Forest Service , 2011 .

[31]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[32]  Paul J. Lavrakas,et al.  Applied Qualitative Research Design: A Total Quality Framework Approach , 2015 .

[33]  J. Hood,et al.  Orthodoxy vs. Power: The Defining Traits of Grounded Theory , 2007 .

[34]  Camila Moreira de Castro.  Public hearings as a tool to improve participation in regulatory policies: case study of the National Agency of Electric Energy , 2013 .

[35]  Daren C. Brabham.  Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects , 2009 .

[36]  B. Geys,et al.  Voter Involvement, Fiscal Autonomy and Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence from German Municipalities , 2010 .

[37]  Artur Gil,et al.  Public participation in municipal transport planning processes – the case of the sustainable mobility plan of Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal , 2011 .

[38]  Charlotte Wahl,et al.  Swedish municipalities and public participation in the traffic planning process – Where do we stand? , 2013 .