The Impact of Conjoint Threats to Social- and Self-Esteem on Evaluation Apprehension

An experiment was conducted to examine the impact of simultaneous threats to socialand self-esteem on evaluation apprehension. Subjects were told they would take a potentially ego-threatening test and that only they, only another individual, both they and the other individual, or no one would see their test scores. Prior to the test, evaluation apprehension was assessed. Results showed that potential threats to selfand social-esteem both increased apprehension, but only in the absence of the other type of ego threat. Further, the presence of both sources of threat did not produce greater apprehension than either threat alone. Also, subjects who scored low versus high on a measure of self-esteem differed in their reactions to socialand self-esteem threats. Results suggest that the effects of conjoint threats to socialand self-esteem are not cumulative.

[1]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology - a useful dichotomy , 1985 .

[2]  R. Arkin,et al.  An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. , 1982 .

[3]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Test anxiety : theory, research, and applications , 1980 .

[4]  S. Duval,et al.  A theory of objective self awareness , 1972 .

[5]  G. Marwell,et al.  Self-esteem : its conceptualization and measurement , 1976 .

[6]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Mark R. Leary,et al.  Cognitive, Affective, and Attributional Effects of Potential Threats to Self-Esteem , 1986 .

[8]  M. Rosenberg Conceiving the self , 1979 .

[9]  M. Leary Understanding Social Anxiety: Social, Personality, and Clinical Perspectives , 1983 .

[10]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  TO WHOM IS THE SELF PRESENTED , 1985 .

[11]  M. J. Rosenberg,et al.  WHEN DISSONANCE FAILS: ON ELIMINATING EVALUATION APPREHENSION FROM ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  D. Paulhus,et al.  The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation management strategies. , 1983 .

[13]  K. Horney Neurosis And Human Growth , 1950 .

[14]  Dianne M. Tice,et al.  Four Selves, Two Motives, and a Substitute Process Self-Regulation Model , 1986 .

[15]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[16]  G. W. Bradley Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[17]  J. S. Shrauger,et al.  Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. , 1979 .

[18]  A. Buss Self-consciousness and social anxiety , 1980 .

[19]  Alfred Adler,et al.  Understanding Human Nature , 1927 .

[20]  J. Fleming,et al.  The dimensionality of self-esteem. II: Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales , 1984 .