An assessment of coefficient accuracy in linear regression models with spatially varying coefficients

The realization in the statistical and geographical sciences that a relationship between an explanatory variable and a response variable in a linear regression model is not always constant across a study area has led to the development of regression models that allow for spatially varying coefficients. Two competing models of this type are geographically weighted regression (GWR) and Bayesian regression models with spatially varying coefficient processes (SVCP). In the application of these spatially varying coefficient models, marginal inference on the regression coefficient spatial processes is typically of primary interest. In light of this fact, there is a need to assess the validity of such marginal inferences, since these inferences may be misleading in the presence of explanatory variable collinearity. In this paper, we present the results of a simulation study designed to evaluate the sensitivity of the spatially varying coefficients in the competing models to various levels of collinearity. The simulation study results show that the Bayesian regression model produces more accurate inferences on the regression coefficients than does GWR. In addition, the Bayesian regression model is overall fairly robust in terms of marginal coefficient inference to moderate levels of collinearity, and degrades less substantially than GWR with strong collinearity.

[1]  M. Goldstein Bayesian analysis of regression problems , 1976 .

[2]  S. Chib,et al.  Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm , 1995 .

[3]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships , 2002 .

[4]  Deepak K. Agarwal,et al.  Slice sampling for simulation based fitting of spatial data models , 2005, Stat. Comput..

[5]  Yee Leung,et al.  Analysing regional industrialisation in Jiangsu province using geographically weighted regression , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[6]  Sudipto Banerjee,et al.  Coregionalized Single‐ and Multiresolution Spatially Varying Growth Curve Modeling with Application to Weed Growth , 2006, Biometrics.

[7]  T. Nakaya Local Spatial Interaction Modelling Based on the Geographically Weighted Regression Approach , 2003 .

[8]  David Wheeler,et al.  Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression , 2005, J. Geogr. Syst..

[9]  C. F. Sirmans,et al.  Nonstationary multivariate process modeling through spatially varying coregionalization , 2004 .

[10]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[11]  Sw. Banerjee,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , 2003 .

[12]  G. Casella,et al.  Explaining the Gibbs Sampler , 1992 .

[13]  Radford M. Neal Slice Sampling , 2003, The Annals of Statistics.

[14]  M. Wand Local Regression and Likelihood , 2001 .

[15]  D. Wheeler Diagnostic Tools and a Remedial Method for Collinearity in Geographically Weighted Regression , 2007 .

[16]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  P. Longley,et al.  Spatial Dependence and Heterogeneity in Patterns of Hardship: An Intra-Urban Analysis , 2004 .

[18]  C. F. Sirmans,et al.  Spatial Modeling With Spatially Varying Coefficient Processes , 2003 .

[19]  S. Walker Invited comment on the paper "Slice Sampling" by Radford Neal , 2003 .

[20]  L. Mark Berliner,et al.  Subsampling the Gibbs Sampler , 1994 .