Recovery of Functional Status After Stroke: A Postrehabilitation Follow‐up Study

Background and Purpose Information on predictors of long-term change in functional capacity after a rehabilitation program in stroke patients is scant. This study describes the long-term evolution of self-reported functional ability after discharge from rehabilitation and its relation with age, level of neural impairment at discharge, and changes in neural impairment during follow-up. Methods Fifty patients (31 men and 19 women; mean±SD age, 66.0±.9 years; range, 47–86 years) with a first unilateral stroke and no severe cognitive impairment were consecutively enrolled. Self-reported disability in activities of daily living and neural impairment measured by the Fugl-Meyer Scale were evaluated after discharge from a rehabilitation program and 3 and 6 months later. Results Functional disability was significantly reduced after 3 and 6 months. Attenuation of disability occurred mainly among those patients with more severe baseline neural impairment. In this group, patients aged ≥65 years were more disabled at baseline than younger individuals, but they had the same rate of improvement. In patients aged <65 years, changes in disability over time could be attributed to changes in neural function, whereas older patients' functional recovery was greater than that expected from their improvement in neural impairment alone. Conclusions These results suggest that in stroke patients with severe neural damage further functional improvement occurs even after completion of a rehabilitation program. There is evidence that older patients may be more likely to employ compensatory strategies to overcome some of the neural impairment that remains after stroke.

[1]  E. Ernst,et al.  A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. , 1990, Stroke.

[2]  L. Jongbloed Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. , 1986, Stroke.

[3]  J. Whisnant,et al.  Disability and use of rehabilitation services following stroke in Rochester, Minnesota, 1975-1979. , 1987, Stroke.

[4]  K. Asplund,et al.  A non-intensive stroke unit reduces functional disability and the need for long-term hospitalization. , 1985, Stroke.

[5]  C. Granger,et al.  Measurement of Outcomes of Care for Stroke Patients , 1975, Stroke.

[6]  M. Lawton,et al.  Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. , 1969, The Gerontologist.

[7]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[8]  C. Aring,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1939, Journal of neurology and psychiatry.

[9]  R L Hewer,et al.  Recovery after stroke--the first 3 months. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  H. Ring,et al.  Acute stroke patients: long-term effects of rehabilitation and maintenance of gains. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  C. Granger,et al.  The stroke rehabilitation outcome study: Part II. Relative merits of the total Barthel index score and a four-item subscore in predicting patient outcomes. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  R Langton-Hewer,et al.  The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  T. P. Anderson Studies Up to 1980 on Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes , 1990, Stroke.

[14]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space , 1983, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[16]  B. Norrving,et al.  Outcome after stroke in patients discharged to independent living. , 1990, Stroke.

[17]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices. , 1986, Biometrics.

[18]  T. P. Anderson,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation: maintenance of achieved gains. , 1977, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  J. Williams,et al.  Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke. , 1990, Stroke.

[21]  D. Wade,et al.  Recovery after stroke , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  M. Kelly‐Hayes Time Intervals, Survival, and Destination: Three Crucial Variables in Stroke Outcome Research , 1990, Stroke.

[23]  I. T. Draper THE ASSESSMENT OF APHASIA AND RELATED DISORDERS , 1973 .

[24]  Problems of Methodological Heterogeneity in Studies Predicting Disability After Stroke , 1990, Stroke.

[25]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[26]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. , 1967, Psychometrika.

[27]  S C Loewen,et al.  Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. , 1990, Stroke.