Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics

Biological processes are dynamic in nature, and growing evidence suggests that matrix stiffening is particularly decisive during development, wound healing and disease; yet, nearly all in vitro models are static. Here we introduce a step-wise approach, addition then light-mediated crosslinking, to fabricate hydrogels that stiffen (for example, ~3-30 kPa) in the presence of cells, and investigated the short-term (minutes-to-hours) and long-term (days-to-weeks) cell response to dynamic stiffening. When substrates are stiffened, adhered human mesenchymal stem cells increase their area from ~500 to 3,000 μm(2) and exhibit greater traction from ~1 to 10 kPa over a timescale of hours. For longer cultures up to 14 days, human mesenchymal stem cells selectively differentiate based on the period of culture, before or after stiffening, such that adipogenic differentiation is favoured for later stiffening, whereas osteogenic differentiation is favoured for earlier stiffening.

[1]  A. Turberfield,et al.  A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA , 2022 .

[2]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[3]  J. Burdick,et al.  Swelling‐Induced Surface Patterns in Hydrogels with Gradient Crosslinking Density , 2009 .

[4]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[5]  Alain Richert,et al.  Real-time single-cell response to stiffness , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  T. Okano,et al.  Thermo-responsive culture dishes allow the intact harvest of multilayered keratinocyte sheets without dispase by reducing temperature. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[7]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Z. Trajanoski,et al.  Gene expression profiling of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow during expansion and osteoblast differentiation , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[9]  Eben Alsberg,et al.  Dual growth factor delivery and controlled scaffold degradation enhance in vivo bone formation by transplanted bone marrow stromal cells. , 2004, Bone.

[10]  N. Langrana,et al.  Effect of dynamic stiffness of the substrates on neurite outgrowth by using a DNA-crosslinked hydrogel. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[11]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Sequential crosslinking to control cellular spreading in 3-dimensional hydrogels , 2009 .

[12]  Fei Wang,et al.  Material Properties of the Cell Dictate Stress-induced Spreading and Differentiation in Embryonic Stem Cells Growing Evidence Suggests That Physical Microenvironments and Mechanical Stresses, in Addition to Soluble Factors, Help Direct Mesenchymal-stem-cell Fate. However, Biological Responses to a L , 2022 .

[13]  Murat Guvendiren,et al.  The control of stem cell morphology and differentiation by hydrogel surface wrinkles. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[14]  P. Gillet,et al.  Phenotypic analysis of cell surface markers and gene expression of human mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes during monolayer expansion. , 2008, Biorheology.

[15]  R. Hibbs.  Electron microscopy of developing cardiac muscle in chick embryos. , 1956, The American journal of anatomy.

[16]  Bjørn T. Stokke,et al.  Logic swelling response of DNA–polymer hybrid hydrogel , 2011 .

[17]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications , 2011, Advanced materials.

[18]  Robert Langer,et al.  Controlled degradation and mechanical behavior of photopolymerized hyaluronic acid networks. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[19]  D. Felsen,et al.  Implications for Fibrosis in Kidney Disease , 2001 .

[20]  T. Tenson,et al.  Phylogenetic distribution of translational GTPases in bacteria , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[21]  Samuel K Sia,et al.  Dynamic Hydrogels: Switching of 3D Microenvironments Using Two‐Component Naturally Derived Extracellular Matrices , 2010, Advanced materials.

[22]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[23]  Timothy J Gardner,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[24]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[25]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Spatially controlled hydrogel mechanics to modulate stem cell interactions , 2010 .

[27]  P. Janmey,et al.  Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: implications for fibrosis. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[28]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Emergence of Patterned Stem Cell Differentiation Within Multicellular Structures , 2008, Stem cells.

[29]  D. C. Lin,et al.  Inducing reversible stiffness changes in DNA-crosslinked gels , 2005 .

[30]  S. E. Jacobsen,et al.  Potential risks of bone marrow cell transplantation into infarcted hearts. , 2007, Blood.

[31]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[32]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  Synthesis of photodegradable hydrogels as dynamically tunable cell culture platforms , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[33]  Marc Tramier,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of cell response to a rigidity gradient: a quantitative study using multiple optical tweezers. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Albert J. Keung,et al.  Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[35]  A. Kho,et al.  Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[37]  P. Janmey,et al.  Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[38]  D. C. Lin,et al.  Mechanical properties of a reversible, DNA-crosslinked polyacrylamide hydrogel. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[39]  V. Mudera,et al.  Close dependence of fibroblast proliferation on collagen scaffold matrix stiffness , 2009, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[40]  Jason A Burdick,et al.  Patterning network structure to spatially control cellular remodeling and stem cell fate within 3-dimensional hydrogels. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[41]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[43]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  Barclay Morrison,et al.  Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[45]  T. Okano,et al.  Novel thermally reversible hydrogel as detachable cell culture substrate. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[46]  K. J. Grande-Allen,et al.  Review. Hyaluronan: a powerful tissue engineering tool. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[47]  B. Hinz,et al.  Myofibroblast contraction activates latent TGF-β1 from the extracellular matrix , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  B. Jugdutt,et al.  Rate of collagen deposition during healing and ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in rat and dog models. , 1996, Circulation.

[49]  N. Langrana,et al.  The relationship between fibroblast growth and the dynamic stiffnesses of a DNA crosslinked hydrogel. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[50]  Francis G Spinale,et al.  Myocardial matrix remodeling and the matrix metalloproteinases: influence on cardiac form and function. , 2007, Physiological reviews.

[51]  Micah Dembo,et al.  The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[52]  Jochen Guck,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  V. Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. , 2012, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[54]  M. Pittenger,et al.  Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. , 1999, Science.

[55]  Fernanda F. Rossetti,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of mechanosensing of cells on dynamically tunable hydrogels. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[56]  Robert A. Brown,et al.  Guiding cell migration in 3D: a collagen matrix with graded directional stiffness. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.