Stationarity of generalized autoregressive moving average models

Time series models are often constructed by combining nonstationary effects such as trends with stochastic processes that are believed to be stationary. Although stationarity of the underlying process is typically crucial to ensure desirable properties or even validity of statistical estimators, there are numerous time series models for which this stationarity is not yet proven. A major barrier is that the most commonly-used methods assume φ-irreducibility, a condition that can be violated for the important class of discrete-valued observation-driven models. We show (strict) stationarity for the class of Generalized Autoregressive Moving Average (GARMA) models, which provides a flexible analogue of ARMA models for count, binary, or other discrete-valued data. We do this from two perspectives. First, we show stationarity and ergodicity of a perturbed version of the GARMA model, and show that the perturbed model yields parameter estimates that are arbitrarily close to those of the original model. This approach utilizes the fact that the perturbed model is φ-irreducible. Second, we show that the original GARMA model has a unique stationary distribution (so is strictly stationary when initialized in that distribution).

[1]  J. Norris Appendix: probability and measure , 1997 .

[2]  D. Tjøstheim,et al.  Nonlinear Poisson autoregression , 2012 .

[3]  Mathew W. McLean,et al.  Forecasting emergency medical service call arrival rates , 2011, 1107.4919.

[4]  Konstantinos Fokianos,et al.  Log-linear Poisson autoregression , 2011, J. Multivar. Anal..

[5]  Dag Tjøstheim,et al.  Poisson Autoregression , 2008 .

[6]  Pentti Saikkonen,et al.  ERGODICITY, MIXING, AND EXISTENCE OF MOMENTS OF A CLASS OF MARKOV MODELS WITH APPLICATIONS TO GARCH AND ACD MODELS , 2008, Econometric Theory.

[7]  C. Zender,et al.  Statistical modeling of valley fever data in Kern County, California , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[8]  Roman Liesenfeld,et al.  Time series of count data: modeling, estimation and diagnostics , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[9]  Alain Latour,et al.  Integer‐Valued GARCH Process , 2006 .

[10]  Jonathan C. Mattingly,et al.  Ergodicity of the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with degenerate stochastic forcing , 2004, math/0406087.

[11]  J. Rosenthal,et al.  General state space Markov chains and MCMC algorithms , 2004, math/0404033.

[12]  W. Dunsmuir,et al.  Observation-driven models for Poisson counts , 2003 .

[13]  R. Rigby,et al.  Generalized Autoregressive Moving Average Models , 2003 .

[14]  L. F. León,et al.  Assessment of model adequacy for Markov regression time series models. , 1998, Biometrics.

[15]  Siem Jan Koopman,et al.  Time Series Analysis of Non-Gaussian Observations Based on State Space Models from Both Classical and Bayesian Perspectives , 1999 .

[16]  K. Chan,et al.  Monte Carlo EM Estimation for Time Series Models Involving Counts , 1995 .

[17]  H. Thorisson Coupling Methods in Probability Theory , 1995 .

[18]  W. Li,et al.  Time series models based on generalized linear models: some further results. , 1994, Biometrics.

[19]  Richard L. Tweedie,et al.  Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability , 1993, Communications and Control Engineering Series.

[20]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Time Series: Theory and Methods (2Nd Edn) , 1993 .

[21]  P. Bougerol,et al.  Strict Stationarity of Generalized Autoregressive Processes , 1992 .

[22]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Time Series: Theory and Methods (2nd ed.). , 1992 .

[23]  P. Brockwell,et al.  Time Series: Theory and Methods , 2013 .

[24]  S. Zeger A regression model for time series of counts , 1988 .

[25]  R. Tweedie Invariant measures for Markov chains with no irreducibility assumptions , 1988, Journal of Applied Probability.

[26]  S. Zeger,et al.  Markov regression models for time series: a quasi-likelihood approach. , 1988, Biometrics.