Scaffolding learners in authentic, problem based e-learning environments: The geography challenge

The affordances of online learning technologies have enabled more widespread development of learning environments that facilitate the exploration and solving of complex and realistic problems. In this paper, we describe the design of a real world geography problem, embedded within a web environment that is facilitated by an onsite excursion for data collection. The learning environment has been designed to deliberately address known problems associated with the problem solving approach, specifically in regard to three issues, and uses scaffolding prompts and supports embedded within the environment to facilitate student learning. The paper describes the theoretical foundations for the approach, the design of the learning task, and specific scaffolding approaches used in the environment.

[1]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[2]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[3]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[4]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[5]  J. Woods.  Beyond the comfort zone. , 2005, Australian nursing journal.

[6]  Mike Schultz,et al.  Exploring the Nardoo , 1997 .

[7]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld , 2001 .

[8]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical Intelligence: The Nature and Role of Tacit Knowledge in Work and at School , 2018, Mechanisms of Everyday Cognition.

[9]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Patterns of understanding with open-ended learning environments: A qualitative study , 1997 .

[10]  James E. McCarthy,et al.  SCAFFOLDING PERFORMANCE IN EPSSS: BRIDGING THEORY AND PRACTICE , 2001 .

[11]  C. McLoughlin,et al.  Developing science students’ metacognitive problem solving skills online , 2001 .

[12]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[13]  Barry Harper,et al.  Developing informal reasoning skills in ill-structured environments. A case study into problem-solving strategies , 2002, ASCILITE.

[14]  J. M. Puckett,et al.  Mechanisms of Everyday Cognition , 2018 .

[15]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Software-Realized Scaffolding to Facilitate Programming for Science Learning , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[16]  Allan Collins,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional Technology. Technical Report. , 1988 .

[17]  L. S. Vygotksy.  Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[18]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Interactive Learning Systems Evaluation , 2003 .

[19]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Learner challenges and situated learning: Engaging students at Sydney Olympic Park , 2004 .

[20]  David H. Jonassen.  On the Role of Concepts in Learning and Instructional Design , 2006 .

[21]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Representations for Scaffolding Collaborative Inquiry on Ill-Structured Problems. , 1998 .

[22]  Carol McGuinness.  Teaching thinking: Theory and Practice. , 2005 .

[23]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  The development of argument skills. , 2003, Child development.

[24]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design , 1995 .

[25]  Jan Herrington,et al.  An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments , 2000 .

[26]  N. Cole.  Conceptions of Educational Achievement , 1990 .

[27]  Thomas Brush,et al.  A Summary of Research Exploring Hard and Soft Scaffolding for Teachers and Students Using a Multimedia Supported Learning Environment , 2002 .

[28]  Allan Collins,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional Technology , 1988 .