A causal loop approach to uncover interrelationship of student online interaction and engagement and their contributing factors

Advances in technology reinforce the imperative to obtain further insight into the factors that impact online interaction in online environments. Even though past researchers have extracted factors impacting student online interaction and engagement, there is a lack of research that uncovers the dynamics of these relationships and investigates the impact of a comprehensive set of factors on student online interaction at the same time. Thus, this paper seeks to fill this gap by employing a causal loop approach to uncover the interrelationships of these factors that contribute to a positive impact on students’ learning outcomes, and to evaluate satisfaction and engagement in online courses by focussing on students’ online interaction. To this end, a rich qualitative data set was obtained from an online focus group consisting of students from a large online course, and a thematic analysis was conducted resulting in identifying different factors that played a role in the topic under study. More importantly, causal loop modelling was used to model these factors and their causal interrelationships.

[1]  Patti Shank,et al.  Learning Anew: An Exploratory Study about New Online Learners' Perceptions of People Interaction and Learning to Learn in an Online Course , 2002 .

[2]  A. Sher.  Assessing the Relationship of Student-Instructor and Student-Student Interaction to Student Learning and Satisfaction in Web-Based Online Learning Environment , 2009 .

[3]  Lydia Kyei-Blankson,et al.  Establishing the Importance of Interaction and Presence to Student Learning in Online Environments , 2016 .

[4]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Jusung Jun,et al.  Understanding E-dropout? , 2005 .

[6]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[7]  Papia Bawa,et al.  Retention in Online Courses , 2016 .

[8]  Wu Bing,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNERS INTERACTION IN THE ONLINE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: DOES NATIONAL CULTURE MATTER? , 2008 .

[9]  Praweenya Suwannatthachote,et al.  Critical Success Factors for Online Distance Learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature , 2012 .

[10]  Xavière Hassan,et al.  What Influences Reflective Interaction in Distance Peer Learning? Evidence from four long-term online learners of French , 2003 .

[11]  Pisit Prougestaporn,et al.  Key Success Factors and Evaluation Criterias of e-Learning Websites for Higher Education , 2015 .

[12]  Mohamed Amin Embi,et al.  Patterns of discourse in online interaction: seeking evidence of the collaborative learning process , 2012 .

[13]  Haidong Wang,et al.  A Qualitative Exploration of the Social Interaction in an Online Learning Community , 2005 .

[14]  Amir Hossein Ghapanchi,et al.  Investigating various application areas of three-dimensional virtual worlds for higher education , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Hye Jeong Kim,et al.  Between ideal and reality: A different view on online-learning interaction in a cross-national context , 2014 .

[16]  Mehmet Barış Horzum,et al.  Relationship between Online Learning Readiness and Structure and Interaction of Online Learning Students. , 2013 .

[17]  Goran Bubaš,et al.  The Evaluation of the Use of Online Community Tool Ning for Support of Student Interaction and Learning , 2010 .

[18]  Yungwei Hao,et al.  Students' attitudes toward interaction in online learning: exploring the relationship between attitudes, learning styles, and course satisfaction , 2004 .

[19]  M. Kang,et al.  Factors of learner-instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  M. Heinemann.  Teacher−Student Interaction and Learning in Online Theological Education. Part Four: Findings and Conclusions , 2007 .

[22]  Fethi A. Inan,et al.  Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[23]  N. Ellison,et al.  Spatially Bounded Online Social Networks and Social Capital: The Role of Facebook , 2006 .

[24]  Griff Richards,et al.  Enhancing Student-Student Online Interaction: Exploring the Study Buddy Peer Review Activity. , 2016 .

[25]  Zahira Merchant,et al.  Exploring 3-D virtual reality technology for spatial ability and chemistry achievement , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[26]  Yu-Chun Kuo,et al.  Interaction and Other Variables as Predictors of Student Satisfaction in Online Learning Environments , 2010 .

[27]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Problems with causal‐loop diagrams , 1986 .

[28]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Exploring Interaction Behaviour and Performance of Online Collaborative Learning Teams , 2003, CRIWG.

[29]  Mete Akcaoglu,et al.  "I see smart people!": Using Facebook to supplement cognitive and affective learning in the university mass lecture , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[30]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  ICT and Healthcare: A Closer Look at the Role of ICTs in Providing Support for Female Victims/Survivors of Domestic Violence (DV) , 2013 .

[31]  Ahmad Muhaimin Mohamad,et al.  Students View on Text Chats (CH), Forum Discussion (FR), and Online Learning Interaction (LI) , 2014 .

[32]  Jennifer Richardson,et al.  The Affordances and Constraints of Asynchronous Learning Networks: Looking at Interaction in an Online Environment , 2000 .