Synthetic robust perfect adaptation achieved by negative feedback coupling with linear weak positive feedback

Abstract Unlike their natural counterparts, synthetic genetic circuits are usually fragile in the face of environmental perturbations and genetic mutations. Several theoretical robust genetic circuits have been designed, but their performance under real-world conditions has not yet been carefully evaluated. Here, we designed and synthesized a new robust perfect adaptation circuit composed of two-node negative feedback coupling with linear positive feedback on the buffer node. As a key feature, the linear positive feedback was fine-tuned to evaluate its necessity. We found that the desired function was robustly achieved when genetic parameters were varied by systematically perturbing all interacting parts within the topology, and the necessity of the completeness of the topological structures was evaluated by destroying key circuit features. Furthermore, different environmental perturbances were imposed onto the circuit by changing growth rates, carbon metabolic strategies and even chassis cells, and the designed perfect adaptation function was still achieved under all conditions. The successful design of a robust perfect adaptation circuit indicated that the top-down design strategy is capable of predictably guiding bottom-up engineering for robust genetic circuits. This robust adaptation circuit could be integrated as a motif into more complex circuits to robustly implement more sophisticated and critical biological functions.

[1]  M. Khammash,et al.  Adaptive Circuits in Synthetic Biology , 2021, Current Opinion in Systems Biology.

[2]  T. Hwa,et al.  Hierarchical and simultaneous utilization of carbon substrates: mechanistic insights, physiological roles, and ecological consequences. , 2021, Current Opinion in Microbiology.

[3]  M. Khammash Perfect adaptation in biology. , 2021, Cell systems.

[4]  Xiao-Jun Tian,et al.  Winner-takes-all resource competition redirects cascading cell fate transitions , 2020, Nature Communications.

[5]  Ting Lu,et al.  Integrative Circuit-Host Modeling of a Genetic Switch in Varying Environments , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Xiao-Jun Tian,et al.  Topology-Dependent Interference of Synthetic Gene Circuit Function by Growth Feedback , 2020, Nature Chemical Biology.

[7]  M. Khammash,et al.  A universal biomolecular integral feedback controller for robust perfect adaptation , 2019, Nature.

[8]  Ankit Gupta,et al.  Antithetic proportional-integral feedback for reduced variance and improved control performance of stochastic reaction networks , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Engineered promoters enable constant gene expression at any copy number in bacteria , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Mustafa Khammash,et al.  Perfect Adaptation and Optimal Equilibrium Productivity in a Simple Microbial Biofuel Metabolic Pathway Using Dynamic Integral Control. , 2018, ACS synthetic biology.

[11]  Shixuan Liu,et al.  Incoherent Inputs Enhance the Robustness of Biological Oscillators. , 2017, Cell systems.

[12]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  Insulated transcriptional elements enable precise design of genetic circuits , 2017, Nature Communications.

[13]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Resource Competition Shapes the Response of Genetic Circuits. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.

[14]  Kang Xia,et al.  Growth strategy of microbes on mixed carbon sources , 2017, Nature Communications.

[15]  Liyang Xiong,et al.  Adaptation with transcriptional regulation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Uri Alon,et al.  Optimal Regulatory Circuit Topologies for Fold-Change Detection. , 2017, Cell systems.

[17]  G. Vinnicombe,et al.  Synchronous long-term oscillations in a synthetic gene circuit , 2016, Nature.

[18]  Mustafa Khammash,et al.  Design of a synthetic integral feedback circuit: dynamic analysis and DNA implementation , 2016, ACS synthetic biology.

[19]  Lingchong You,et al.  Addressing biological uncertainties in engineering gene circuits. , 2016, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[20]  M. Khammash An engineering viewpoint on biological robustness , 2016, BMC Biology.

[21]  Chunbo Lou,et al.  Measurements of Gene Expression at Steady State Improve the Predictability of Part Assembly. , 2016, ACS synthetic biology.

[22]  James E Ferrell,et al.  Perfect and Near-Perfect Adaptation in Cell Signaling. , 2016, Cell systems.

[23]  D. Dunlap,et al.  DNA supercoiling, a critical signal regulating the basal expression of the lac operon in Escherichia coli , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Haeyoung Jeong,et al.  Complete Genome Sequence of Escherichia coli Strain BL21 , 2015, Genome Announcements.

[25]  Frédéric Grenier,et al.  Complete Genome Sequence of Escherichia coli BW25113 , 2014, Genome Announcements.

[26]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Design principles of regulatory networks: searching for the molecular algorithms of the cell. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[27]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Designing Synthetic Regulatory Networks Capable of Self-Organizing Cell Polarization , 2012, Cell.

[28]  Casim A. Sarkar,et al.  Robust Network Topologies for Generating Switch-Like Cellular Responses , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  Han-Xiong Li,et al.  Architecture-dependent robustness and bistability in a class of genetic circuits. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[30]  M. Feinberg,et al.  Structural Sources of Robustness in Biochemical Reaction Networks , 2010, Science.

[31]  T. Hwa,et al.  Growth Rate-Dependent Global Effects on Gene Expression in Bacteria , 2009, Cell.

[32]  L. Tsimring,et al.  A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks , 2009, Nature.

[33]  W. Lim,et al.  Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation , 2009, Cell.

[34]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  A Systems-Level Analysis of Perfect Adaptation in Yeast Osmoregulation , 2009, Cell.

[35]  Ricard V Solé,et al.  Distributed robustness in cellular networks: insights from synthetic evolved circuits , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  A. Wagner,et al.  Multifunctionality and robustness trade-offs in model genetic circuits. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[39]  A. Wagner Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[40]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  O. White,et al.  Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida KT2440. , 2002, Environmental microbiology.

[42]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[43]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[44]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  A. Wagner Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[46]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[47]  M. Khammash,et al.  Antithetic Integral Feedback Ensures Robust Perfect Adaptation in Noisy Biomolecular Networks. , 2016, Cell systems.

[48]  M. Hoagland,et al.  Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers SECOND EDITION , 2015 .

[49]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Milo , Networks Network Motifs : Simple Building Blocks of Complex , 2002 .