Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B

In a survey of 350 laboratories, 41 of 210 respondents indicated that they performed antifungal susceptibility tests. Two-thirds performed 20 or fewer tests per year, and most used a broth dilution method to test amphotericin B and flucytosine activity against Candida albicans. The broth dilution procedure of S. Shadomy and A. Espinel-Ingroff (p. 647-653, in E.H. Lennette, ed., Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 3rd ed., 1980) was the method most frequently cited, and therefore this method was used to test the susceptibility of five isolates of C. albicans and one of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to amphotericin B and flucytosine in seven research laboratories. Agreement among replicates performed on the same day by each laboratory was excellent for both drugs, all values being within 1 twofold drug dilution. Precision from week to week for each laboratory was also good, with 95 and 92% of values being within 1 drug dilution for amphotericin B and flucytosine, respectively. Interlaboratory precision, however, was poor. For amphotericin B, values varied 8- to 32-fold, and for flucytosine, they varied 32- to greater than 512-fold. We conclude that antifungal susceptibility testing is currently being performed in small volumes by numerous laboratories in the United States and that results from one laboratory may not agree with results from another. Improved standardization of fungal susceptibility tests is necessary before their results can be generally applied to clinical situations.

[1]  J. Galgiani,et al.  Analysis of pH and buffer effects on flucytosine activity in broth dilution susceptibility testing of Candida albicans in two synthetic media , 1984, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[2]  J. F. Ryley,et al.  Azole resistance in Candida albicans. , 1984, Sabouraudia.

[3]  D. Stevens,et al.  Correlation of in vitro susceptibility test results with in vivo response: flucytosine therapy in a systemic candidiasis model. , 1983, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[4]  N. Nakamizo,et al.  Effects of pH on the Activity of Ketoconazole Against Candida albicans , 1983, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[5]  F. Odds Interactions among amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, ketoconazole, and miconazole against pathogenic fungi in vitro , 1982, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[6]  D. Stevens,et al.  Susceptibility to 5-fluorocytosine and prevalence of serotype in 402 Candida albicans isolates from the United States , 1982, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[7]  M. Viviani Susceptibility testing to antifungal drugs. , 1982, Annali Sclavo; rivista di microbiologia e di immunologia.

[8]  W. Merz,et al.  Incidence of polyene-resistant yeasts recovered from clinical specimens , 1980, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  M. Borgers,et al.  The Activity of Ketoconazole in Mixed Cultures of Fungi and Human Fibroblasts: Die Wirkung von Ketoconazol in Mischkulturen von Pilzen und menschlichen Fibroblasten , 1980, Mykosen.

[10]  D. Stevens,et al.  Variability of Agar Dilution-Replicator Method of Yeast Susceptibility Testing , 1979, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[11]  G. P. Andrews,et al.  Comparison of Microdilution and Broth Dilution Techniques for the Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts to 5-Fluorocytosine and Amphotericin B , 1979, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[12]  R. Bannatyne,et al.  Susceptibility of Candida albicans to Miconazole , 1978, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  J. Galgiani,et al.  Turbidimetric Studies of Growth Inhibition of Yeasts with Three Drugs: Inquiry into Inoculum-Dependent Susceptibility Testing, Time of Onset of Drug Effect, and Implications for Current and Newer Methods , 1978, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  R. White,et al.  Factors influencing the susceptibility of Candida albicans to the polyenoic antibiotics nystatin and amphotericin B. , 1978, Journal of general microbiology.

[15]  S. Shadomy,et al.  Antifungal activity of 5-fluorocytosine as measured by disk diffusion susceptibility testing. , 1977, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  A. Espinel-Ingroff,et al.  In vitro studies with miconazole and miconazole nitrate. , 1977, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[17]  J. Prier,et al.  The Clinical laboratory as an aid in chemotherapy of infectious disease , 1977 .

[18]  P. Hoeprich,et al.  Effect of culture media on the antifungal activity of miconazole and amphotericin B methyl ester. , 1976, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[19]  S. Shadomy,et al.  New Medium for In Vitro Susceptibility Studies with Amphotericin B , 1976, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[20]  J. Galgiani,et al.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: a Turbidimetric Technique Independent of Inoculum Size , 1976, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[21]  R. Holt Laboratory tests of antifungal drugs. , 1975, Journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  H. van den Bossche,et al.  The action of miconazole of the growth of Candida albicans. , 1975, Sabouraudia.

[23]  E. Block,et al.  Variables Influencing Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to 5-Fluorocytosine , 1973, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[24]  S. Shadomy,et al.  In Vitro Activity of 5-Fluorocytosine Against Candida and Torulopsis Species , 1973, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[25]  M. Grenson,et al.  Interference between the uptake of pyrimidines and purines in yeasts. , 1973, Pathologia et microbiologia.

[26]  R. Holt,et al.  Laboratory assessment of the antimycotic drug clotrimazole , 1972, Journal of clinical pathology.

[27]  P. Hoeprich,et al.  Obfuscation of the activity of antifungal antimicrobics by culture media. , 1972, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[28]  S. Shadomy In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Clotrimazole (Bay b 5097) , 1971, Infection and immunity.