Hospital collaboration with emergency medical services in the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction: perspectives from key hospital staff.

STUDY OBJECTIVE Evidence suggests that active collaboration between hospitals and emergency medical services (EMS) is significantly associated with lower acute myocardial infarction mortality rates; however, the nature of such collaborations is not well understood. We seek to characterize views of key hospital staff about collaboration with EMS in the care of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS We performed an exploratory analysis of qualitative data previously collected from site visits and detailed interviews with 11 US hospitals that ranked in the top or bottom 5% of performance on 30-day risk-standardized acute myocardial infarction mortality rates, using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data from 2005 to 2007. We selected all codes from the previous analysis in which EMS was most likely to have been discussed. A multidisciplinary team analyzed the data with the constant comparative method to generate recurrent themes. RESULTS Both higher- and lower-performing hospitals reported that EMS is critical to the provision of timely care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, close collaborative relationships with EMS were more apparent in the higher-performing hospitals, which demonstrated specific investment in and attention to EMS through respect for EMS as valued professionals and colleagues, strong communication and coordination with EMS and active engagement of EMS in hospital acute myocardial infarction quality improvement efforts. CONCLUSION Hospital staff from higher-performing hospitals described broad, multifaceted strategies to support collaboration with EMS in providing acute myocardial infarction care. The association of these strategies with hospital performance should be tested quantitatively in a larger representative study.

[1]  S. Normand,et al.  Patterns of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure 30-Day Mortality and Readmission , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[2]  E John Orav,et al.  Quality of care and patient outcomes in critical access rural hospitals. , 2011, JAMA.

[3]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Hospital Strategies for Reducing Risk-Standardized Mortality Rates in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  Bentley J Bobrow,et al.  Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  C. Cannon,et al.  The NCDR ACTION Registry–GWTG: transforming contemporary acute myocardial infarction clinical care , 2010, Heart.

[6]  Sonya L Ranson,et al.  Teamwork training improves the clinical care of trauma patients. , 2010, Journal of surgical education.

[7]  M. Leonard,et al.  The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[8]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  What Distinguishes Top-Performing Hospitals in Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality Rates? , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[10]  S. Normand,et al.  An Administrative Claims Model Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Mortality Rates Among Patients With an Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[12]  N Mays,et al.  Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research , 1995 .

[13]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  The Johns Hopkins Hospital: identifying and addressing risks and safety issues. , 2004, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[14]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research , 2009, Circulation.

[15]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health Care , 1999 .

[16]  S. Sofaer Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? , 1999, Health services research.

[17]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Behaviors of successful interdisciplinary hospital quality improvement teams. , 2011, Journal of hospital medicine.

[19]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Time to treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[21]  Jonathan Fine,et al.  Use of Multidisciplinary Rounds to Simultaneously Improve Quality Outcomes, Enhance Resident Education, and Shorten Length of Stay , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[22]  E. Peterson,et al.  A Qualitative Assessment of Practices Associated With Shorter Door-to-Needle Time for Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2011, The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses.

[23]  Grant Mccracken The long interview , 1988 .

[24]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Research in action: using positive deviance to improve quality of health care , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[25]  David C Mohr,et al.  Teamwork Culture and Patient Satisfaction in Hospitals , 2004, Medical care.

[26]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Survival after acute myocardial infarction (SAMI) study: the design and implementation of a positive deviance study. , 2011, American heart journal.

[27]  A. Amin,et al.  Emergency medicine and hospital medicine: a call for collaboration. , 2012, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[28]  Arthur L Kellermann,et al.  CARES: Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[29]  S. Normand,et al.  Variation in hospital mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[31]  M. King,et al.  Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing , 2000 .

[32]  Nicholas Genes,et al.  Electronic collaboration: using technology to solve old problems of quality care. , 2010, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[33]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Socioeconomic status, treatment, and outcomes among elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the National Heart Failure Project. , 2006, American Heart Journal.

[34]  R. Neumar,et al.  Part 9: post-cardiac arrest care: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[35]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[36]  K. Malterud Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[37]  E. Antman,et al.  Systems of Care for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the American Heart Association’s Mission: Lifeline , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[38]  Kevin Burns,et al.  An Open, Interoperable, and Scalable Prehospital Information Technology Network Architecture , 2011, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[39]  Adam B. Landman,et al.  Prehospital Electronic Patient Care Report Systems: Early Experiences from Emergency Medical Services Agency Leaders , 2012, PloS one.