The moral psychology of value sensitive design: the methodological issues of moral intuitions for responsible innovation

ABSTRACTThis paper argues that although moral intuitions are insufficient for making judgments on new technological innovations, they maintain great utility for informing responsible innovation. To...

[1]  Marianne Boenink,et al.  The Multiple Practices of Doing ‘Ethics in the Laboratory’: A Mid-level Perspective , 2013 .

[2]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[3]  D. Secko,et al.  Responsible innovation: an approach for extracting public values concerning advanced biofuels , 2015 .

[4]  Problems with Moral Intuitions Regarding Technologies , 2016, IEEE Potentials.

[5]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Charting the Next Decade for Value Sensitive Design , 2015 .

[6]  Sabine Maasen,et al.  Governing Future Technologies : Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime , 2010 .

[7]  Rider W. Foley,et al.  Towards an alignment of activities, aspirations and stakeholders for responsible innovation , 2016 .

[8]  J. Hoven.  Architecture and Value-Sensitive Design , 2013 .

[9]  J. van den Hoven,et al.  Ethics and Nanopharmacy: Value Sensitive Design of New Drugs , 2011, Nanoethics.

[10]  Mario Kaiser,et al.  Futures Assessed: How Technology Assessment, Ethics and Think Tanks Make Sense of an Unknown Future , 2009 .

[11]  Patricia H. Werhane,et al.  Moral imagination and management decision-making , 1999 .

[12]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Service robots, care ethics, and design , 2016, Ethics and Information Technology.

[13]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  Deliberating Competence , 2008 .

[14]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[15]  D. Stemerding,et al.  Anticipating the Interaction between Technology and Morality: A Scenario Study of Experimenting with Humans in Bionanotechnology , 2010 .

[16]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Responsible innovation as an endorsement of public values: the need for interdisciplinary research , 2014 .

[17]  Batya Friedman,et al.  New directions: a value-sensitive design approach to augmented reality , 2000, DARE '00.

[18]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[19]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[20]  N. Bostrom,et al.  The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics* , 2006, Ethics.

[21]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Information Technology and Moral Philosophy: Introduction , 2008 .

[22]  Philip A.E. Brey,et al.  Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies , 2012, NanoEthics.

[23]  F. Wickson,et al.  Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology , 2011 .

[24]  Mary L Cummings,et al.  Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.

[25]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[26]  M. Waldmann,et al.  Throwing a Bomb on a Person Versus Throwing a Person on a Bomb , 2007, Psychological science.

[27]  W. Hall,et al.  Begging Important Questions About Cognitive Enhancement, Again , 2011 .

[28]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[29]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years , 2011 .

[30]  F. Lucivero.  Too good to be true?: Appraising expectations for ethical technology assessment , 2012 .

[31]  Rebecca Roache.  Ethics, Speculation, and Values , 2008 .

[32]  Joshua D. Greene.  Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics* , 2014, Ethics.

[33]  Francien Dechesne,et al.  Ethical requirements for reconfigurable sensor technology: a challenge for value sensitive design , 2013, Ethics and Information Technology.

[34]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technology as prospective ontology , 2009, Synthese.

[35]  J. Savulescu.  Genetic interventions and the ethics of enhancement of human beings , 2016 .

[36]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  James Woodward,et al.  Moral intuition: Its neural substrates and normative significance , 2007, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[38]  L. Grégoire,et al.  Basal ganglia group II metabotropic glutamate receptors specific binding in non-human primate model of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias , 2008, Neuropharmacology.

[39]  Principles and Intuitions in Ethics: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives* , 2014, Ethics.

[40]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  The emergence and policy implications of converging new technologies integrated from the nanoscale , 2005 .

[41]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Ethicist as Designer: A Pragmatic Approach to Ethics in the Lab , 2014, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[42]  Richard A. Shweder,et al.  The Future of Moral Psychology: Truth, Intuition, and the Pluralist Way , 1993 .

[43]  M. King,et al.  Speculative Ethics: Valid Enterprise or Tragic Cul-De-Sac? , 2011 .

[44]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Values Levers , 2013 .

[45]  Marianne Boenink,et al.  Tensions and Opportunities in Convergence: Shifting Concepts of Disease in Emerging Molecular Medicine , 2009, Nanoethics.

[46]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[47]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[48]  Jeroen van den Hoven.  Nanotechnology and Privacy: The Instructive Case of RFID , 2006 .

[49]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society , 2012, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[50]  Tsjalling Swierstra,et al.  Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies , 2011, Nanoethics.

[51]  Simon Brown,et al.  The new deficit model. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[52]  Arie Rip,et al.  Emerging De Facto Agendas Surrounding Nanotechnology: Two Cases Full of Contingencies, Lock-outs, and Lock-ins , 2009 .

[53]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Mapping the integrative field: taking stock of socio-technical collaborations , 2015 .

[54]  J. Savulescu,et al.  Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[55]  A. Nordmann.  Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation , 2014 .

[56]  J. Knobe,et al.  Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions , 2007 .

[57]  Pamela Briggs,et al.  An Inclusive, Value Sensitive Design Perspective on Future Identity Technologies , 2015, TCHI.

[58]  M. Hauser,et al.  The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment , 2006, Psychological science.

[59]  Carla Alvial-Palavicino,et al.  The Future as Practice. A Framework to Understand Anticipation in Science and Technology , 2016 .

[60]  Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst,et al.  Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[61]  D. Collingridge.  The social control of technology , 1980 .

[62]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods , 2002 .

[63]  Bruno Cozzi,et al.  Expression of calcium-binding proteins and selected neuropeptides in the human, chimpanzee, and crab-eating macaque claustrum , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[64]  Reginald A. Litz.  Moral Imagination and Management Decision Making , 2000 .

[65]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory , 2013 .

[66]  David H Guston,et al.  Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’ , 2014, Social Studies of Science.