Building Pareto Frontiers under tree-level forest planning using airborne laser scanning, growth models and spatial optimization

Abstract This article evaluates the conflicts between spatial, production and financial goals using tree-level decision-support built from stand dynamics equations, airborne laser scanning data and optimization based on mixed integer programming. The resulting Pareto Frontiers evaluated the role of spatial goals to create compact treatment areas along the 10-year forest plan composed of two periods. The weight of spatial goals was progressively increased to quantify the trade-offs towards (1) financial performance, (2) timber production, (3) clustering of harvesting decisions and (4) the Hart-Becking stand density index computed at tree-level using regions derived from ALS. The proposed framework was illustrated in pine forest located in Central Spain using tree-level inventory. The proposed tree selection method was feasible and provided results fast to support operational decision-making. Proved feasibility of the tree selection method optimization allowed the fast PF computation. The results showed the benefit of increasing the weight of spatial goals up to 20–40% to promote the clustering of tree harvests. The observed reduction of financial revenues from increasing priority to spatial clustering paid off, financially and operationally, considering the possible implementation of solutions, which were very dispersed when fully maximizing revenues or benefit. The assimilation of the Pareto Frontier supported with robust optimization contributes to improve forest management planning efficiency. This article turns tree-level decision making into contemporary by integrating multi-temporal decisions, using multi-objective scenarios to assess preferences, and making use of ALS technology as the vector to transform forest data into management decisions.

[1]  Adrian Pascual Arranz,et al.  Improving forest management planning by means of airborne laser scanning and dynamic treatment units based on spatial optimization , 2018 .

[2]  Mikael Rönnqvist,et al.  Operations Research challenges in forestry: 33 open problems , 2015, Annals of Operations Research.

[3]  Petteri Packalen,et al.  Influence of size and shape of forest inventory units on the layout of harvest blocks in numerical forest planning , 2018, European Journal of Forest Research.

[4]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[5]  T. Fonseca,et al.  A silvicultural stand density model to control understory in maritime pine stands , 2017 .

[6]  N. Magagnotti,et al.  The effect of feedstock, knife wear and work station on the exposure to noise and vibrations in wood chipping operations , 2018 .

[7]  Julio Eduardo Arce,et al.  Promoting harvesting stands connectivity and its economic implications in Brazilian forest plantations applying integer linear programming and simulated annealing , 2016 .

[8]  Rafael Calama,et al.  Interregional nonlinear height-diameter model with random coefficients for stone pine in Spain , 2004 .

[9]  G. Asner,et al.  Mapping tropical forest carbon: Calibrating plot estimates to a simple LiDAR metric , 2014 .

[10]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Optimal management of Pinus pinea stands when cone and timber production are considered , 2016, European Journal of Forest Research.

[11]  Adrián Pascual,et al.  Multi-objective forest planning at tree-level combining mixed integer programming and airborne laser scanning , 2020 .

[12]  Adrián Pascual,et al.  Using Tree Detection Based on Airborne Laser Scanning to Improve Forest Inventory Considering Edge Effects and the Co-Registration Factor , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Beyond 3-D: The New Spectrum of Lidar Applications for Earth and Ecological Sciences , 2016 .

[14]  Marc E. McDill,et al.  Comparing Model I and Model II formulations of spatially explicit harvest scheduling models with maximum area restrictions , 2016 .

[15]  V. Pareto Manuel D'Economie Politique , 1988 .

[16]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Support Methods in Forest Management , 2002 .

[17]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Review of combinatorial problems induced by spatial forest harvesting planning , 2006, Discret. Appl. Math..

[18]  Marc E. McDill,et al.  Promoting Large, Compact Mature Forest Patches in Harvest Scheduling Models , 2008 .

[19]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Tropical forest carbon assessment: integrating satellite and airborne mapping approaches , 2009 .

[20]  E. Næsset,et al.  Value of airborne laser scanning and digital aerial , 2018 .

[21]  Pete Bettinger,et al.  Tree-Level Harvest Optimization for Structure-Based Forest Management Based on the Species Mingling Index , 2015 .

[22]  Martin Brandt,et al.  An unexpectedly large count of trees in the West African Sahara and Sahel , 2020, Nature.

[23]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Combining spatial and economic criteria in tree-level harvest planning , 2020, Forest Ecosystems.

[24]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Integrating Fire Risk Considerations in Forest Management Planning in Spain – A Landscape Level Perspective , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Integrating technologies for scalable ecology and conservation , 2016 .

[26]  T. E. Lovejoy,et al.  A Global Deal For Nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets , 2019, Science Advances.

[27]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Selecting the trees to be harvested based on the relative value growth of the remaining trees , 2016, European Journal of Forest Research.

[28]  A. Weintraub,et al.  Forest management challenges for operational researchers , 1998 .

[29]  Vladimir A. Bushenkov,et al.  Addressing Multicriteria Forest Management With Pareto Frontier Methods: An Application in Portugal , 2014 .

[30]  B. Koch,et al.  Detection of individual tree crowns in airborne lidar data , 2006 .