A pipeline for developing and testing staining protocols for flow cytometry, demonstrated with SYBR Green I and propidium iodide viability staining.

The increasing use of flow cytometry (FCM) for analyses of environmental samples has resulted in a large variety of staining protocols with varying results and limited comparability. Viability assessment with FCM is in this context of particular interest because incorrect staining could severely affect the outcome/interpretation of the results. Here we propose a pipeline for the development and optimization of staining protocols for environmental samples, demonstrated with the common viability dye combination of SYBR Green I (SG) and propidium iodide (PI). Optimization steps included the assessment of dye solvents, determination of suitable PI concentration, and determining the optimal staining temperature and staining time. We demonstrated that dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) could impair membrane integrity, when used for SGPI stock solution preparation, and TRIS buffer was chosen as an alternative. Moreover we selected 6μM as optimal PI final concentration: less than 3μM resulted in incomplete staining of damaged cells, while concentrations higher that 12μM resulted in false PI-positive staining of intact cells. Low temperatures (25°C) resulted in a slow reaction and did not enable the staining of all bacteria, while high temperatures (44°C) caused damage to cells and false PI-positive results. Hence, 35°C was selected as optimal staining temperature. We further showed that a minimum of 15min were necessary to obtain stable staining results. Moreover, we showed that addition of EDTA resulted in 1-39% more PI-positive results compared to an EDTA-free sample, and argue that insufficient evidence currently exist in favor of adding EDTA to all samples in general. Altogether, the data clearly shows the need to be careful, precise and reproducible when staining cells for flow cytometric analyses, and the need to assess and optimize staining protocols with both viable and non-viable bacteria.

[1]  J. Vives-Rego,et al.  Flow cytometric assessment of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium starvation-survival in seawater using rhodamine 123, propidium iodide, and oxonol , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  M. Vaara,et al.  Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane. , 1992, Microbiological reviews.

[3]  H. Deeth,et al.  Effects of nisin, EDTA and salts of organic acids on Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella and native microflora on fresh vacuum packaged shrimps stored at 4 °C. , 2012, Food microbiology.

[4]  P. Tremonte,et al.  A comparison of fluorescent stains for the assessment of viability and metabolic activity of lactic acid bacteria , 2012, World journal of microbiology & biotechnology.

[5]  M. Labra,et al.  Two and three-color fluorescence flow cytometric analysis of immunoidentified viable bacteria. , 2000, Cytometry.

[6]  S. Günther,et al.  Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria , 2007, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[7]  S. Mukanganyama,et al.  Evaluation of cell membrane integrity as a potential antimicrobial target for plant products , 2014, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

[8]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Flow cytometry and adenosine tri-phosphate analysis: alternative possibilities to evaluate major bacteriological changes in drinking water treatment and distribution systems. , 2012, Water research.

[9]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Assessment and Interpretation of Bacterial Viability by Using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit in Combination with Flow Cytometry , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  Jamshed Anwar,et al.  Molecular basis for dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) action on lipid membranes. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  R. Desjardins,et al.  LIVE/DEAD BacLight : application of a new rapid staining method for direct enumeration of viable and total bacteria in drinking water. , 1999, Journal of microbiological methods.

[12]  S. Stocks Mechanism and use of the commercially available viability stain, BacLight , 2004, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[13]  Jamshed Anwar,et al.  Modulating the structure and properties of cell membranes: the molecular mechanism of action of dimethyl sulfoxide. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[14]  L. Mir,et al.  Effects of Dimethyl Sulfoxide in Cholesterol-Containing Lipid Membranes: A Comparative Study of Experiments In Silico and with Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  R. Danovaro,et al.  Synoptic determination of living/dead and active/dormant bacterial fractions in marine sediments. , 2006, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[16]  C. Hewitt,et al.  Analysis of bacterial function by multi-colour fluorescence flow cytometry and single cell sorting. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[17]  S. Condón,et al.  Membrane Damage and Microbial Inactivation by Chlorine in the Absence and Presence of a Chlorine-Demanding Substrate , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Kinetics of membrane damage to high (HNA) and low (LNA) nucleic acid bacterial clusters in drinking water by ozone, chlorine, chlorine dioxide, monochloramine, ferrate(VI), and permanganate. , 2011, Water research.

[19]  Thomas Egli,et al.  Flow-cytometric study of vital cellular functions in Escherichia coli during solar disinfection (SODIS). , 2006, Microbiology.

[20]  R. Reigada,et al.  Effects of dimethyl sulfoxide on lipid membrane electroporation. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  E. Berger-Preiss,et al.  Organophosphates (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, fenitrothion, fenthion, malathion) [Biomonitoring Methods, 2007] , 2012 .

[22]  L. Zaika,et al.  Growth kinetics and cell morphology of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A as affected by temperature, NaCl, and EDTA. , 2003, Journal of food protection.

[23]  C. Hewitt,et al.  Use of multi-staining flow cytometry to characterise the physiological state of Escherichia coli W3110 in high cell density fed-batch cultures. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Bernhard Sonnleitner,et al.  Development and laboratory‐scale testing of a fully automated online flow cytometer for drinking water analysis , 2012, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[25]  J. Hamilton-miller Damaging effects of ethylenediaminetetra-acetate and penicillins on permeability barriers in Gram-negative bacteria. , 1966, The Biochemical journal.

[26]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Monitoring microbiological changes in drinking water systems using a fast and reproducible flow cytometric method. , 2013, Water research.

[27]  G. Mcdonnell,et al.  Antisepsis, Disinfection, and Sterilization: Types, Action, and Resistance, Second Edition , 2007 .

[28]  T. Egli,et al.  Rapid, cultivation-independent assessment of microbial viability in drinking water. , 2008, Water research.

[29]  J. Costerton,et al.  Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer modification of Escherichia coli outer membrane permeability , 1981, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  Nico Boon,et al.  Routine bacterial analysis with automated flow cytometry. , 2013, Journal of microbiological methods.

[31]  Nico Boon,et al.  A microbiology-based multi-parametric approach towards assessing biological stability in drinking water distribution networks. , 2013, Water research.

[32]  Alessandra Ghiani,et al.  Resolution of Viable and Membrane-Compromised Bacteria in Freshwater and Marine Waters Based on Analytical Flow Cytometry and Nucleic Acid Double Staining , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Cytometric methods for measuring bacteria in water: advantages, pitfalls and applications , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[34]  Anne K Camper,et al.  Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[35]  H. Abriouel,et al.  Response of Salmonella choleraesuis LT2 Spheroplasts and Permeabilized Cells to the Bacteriocin AS-48 , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  J. Kraniak,et al.  Effect of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) and Metal Ions on Growth of Staphylococcus aureus 196E in Culture Media , 1988 .

[37]  J. Gasol,et al.  Evaluating the Flow-Cytometric Nucleic Acid Double-Staining Protocol in Realistic Situations of Planktonic Bacterial Death , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[38]  J. Block,et al.  Nucleic acid fluorochromes and flow cytometry prove useful in assessing the effect of chlorination on drinking water bacteria. , 2005, Water research.

[39]  D. Gibson,et al.  Distinguishing between living and nonliving bacteria: Evaluation of the vital stain propidium iodide and its combined use with molecular probes in aquatic samples , 1998 .

[40]  Daniel Hoefel,et al.  Enumeration of water-borne bacteria using viability assays and flow cytometry: a comparison to culture-based techniques. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[41]  David G. Weissbrodt,et al.  The feasibility of automated online flow cytometry for in-situ monitoring of microbial dynamics in aquatic ecosystems , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[42]  P. Quinn,et al.  Dimethyl sulphoxide: A review of its applications in cell biology , 1994, Bioscience reports.

[43]  Janne Lehtinen,et al.  Green fluorescent protein–propidium iodide (GFP‐PI) based assay for flow cytometric measurement of bacterial viability , 2004, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[44]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Behavior and stability of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) during chlorine disinfection. , 2016, Water research.

[45]  B. Riedl,et al.  Optimization of the antimicrobial activity of nisin, Na-EDTA and pH against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria , 2015 .