Coalition stability is an important concept in coalition formation. One common assumption in many stability criteria in non-transferable utility games is that the preference of each agent is publicly known so that a coalition is said to be stable if there is no objections by any sub-group of agents according to the publicly known preferences. However, in many applications including some software agent applications, this assumption is not true. Instead, agents are modeled as individuals with private belief and decisions are made according to those beliefs instead of common knowledge. Such belief based architectures have impacts on the coalition's stability which is not reflected in the current stability criteria. In this paper, we extend the classic stability concept of the core by proposing a new belief based stability criterion which we labeled the belief-based core.
[1]
Anke Gerber.
Coalition formation in general NTU games
,
2000
.
[2]
Anke Gerber.
original papers: Coalition formation in general NTU games
,
2000
.
[3]
Sarit Kraus,et al.
Coalition formation with uncertain heterogeneous information
,
2003,
AAMAS '03.
[4]
R. Vohra.
Incomplete Information, Incentive Compatibility, and the Core
,
1999
.
[5]
Sarit Kraus,et al.
The advantages of compromising in coalition formation with incomplete information
,
2004,
Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..