Using Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimators in Comparative Effectiveness Analyses With Observational Databases

Inverse probability-weighted estimation is a powerful tool for use with observational data. In this article, we describe how this propensity score-based method can be used to compare the effectiveness of 2 or more treatments. First, we discuss the inherent problems in using observational data to assess comparative effectiveness. Next, we provide a conceptual explanation of inverse probability-weighted estimation and point readers to sources that address the method in more formal, technical terms. Finally, we offer detailed guidance about how to implement the estimators in comparative effectiveness analyses.

[1]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[2]  Mark J van der Laan,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral adherence interventions. Using marginal structural models to replicate the findings of randomized controlled trials. , 2006, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[3]  J. Avorn,et al.  Variable selection for propensity score models. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  J. Crowley,et al.  Estimation of Cumulative Incidence in the Presence of Competing Risks , 2005 .

[5]  R. Foley,et al.  The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. , 2004, Kidney international.

[6]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  G. Imbens,et al.  Estimation of Causal Effects using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart Catheterization , 2001, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[8]  A. Tsiatis,et al.  Utilizing Propensity Scores to Estimate Causal Treatment Effects with Censored Time‐Lagged Data , 2001, Biometrics.

[9]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. , 2000, Epidemiology.

[10]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Estimating medical costs with censored data , 2000 .

[11]  A A Tsiatis,et al.  Testing for differences in survival with delayed ascertainment. , 2000, Biometrics.

[12]  A A Tsiatis,et al.  Efficient Estimation of the Distribution of Quality‐Adjusted Survival Time , 1999, Biometrics.

[13]  R. D'Agostino.  Adjustment Methods: Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in the Comparison of a Treatment to a Non‐Randomized Control Group , 2005 .

[14]  D B Rubin,et al.  Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. , 1996, Biometrics.

[15]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors are not Always Observed , 1994 .

[16]  Nicholas P. Jewell,et al.  AIDS epidemiology : methodological issues , 1993 .

[17]  J. Robins,et al.  Recovery of Information and Adjustment for Dependent Censoring Using Surrogate Markers , 1992 .

[18]  D. Rubin.  [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies , 1990 .

[19]  T. Speed,et al.  On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9 , 1990 .

[20]  P. Rosenbaum.  Model-Based Direct Adjustment , 1987 .

[21]  P. Holland.  Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[23]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[24]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[25]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .