Farmers' perspectives on field crop robots - Evidence from Bavaria, Germany

Abstract Farmers’ attitudes toward field crop robots in a European setting have hardly been studied despite an increasing availability of the technology. Given the relevance of robots for small-scale agriculture, however, their acceptability in regions dominated by small-scale agriculture such as Bavaria, Germany, is of particular interest. Based on a sample of 174 farmers, an exploratory investigation of factors influencing the preference for large or small field crop robots in general and in specific settings and for mode of operation was carried out. Data were gathered using questionnaires at two events including lectures and field demonstrations and analyzed using bivariate tests. Farm size, farming system (organic/conventional), and occupational structure (part-time/full-time) were relevant attributes influencing the evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of field crop robots. Generally, respondents from larger farms focus more on financial benefits from robots and prefer large autonomous tractors. Conversely, small-scale or organic farmers consider environmental benefits of field crop robots relatively more important and favor small robots. Organic farming also positively correlates with the intent to purchase field crop robots within the next five years. More farmers can generally imagine owning small robots as opposed to an autonomous tractor in ten years, but at the same time view autonomous tractors as more suitable for most specified agronomic tasks. Non-purchase options such as contractor services and machinery sharing represent the preferred modes of robot deployment.

[1]  Grzegorz Cielniak,et al.  Safe Human-Robot Interaction in Agriculture , 2018, HRI.

[2]  Noboru Noguchi,et al.  Development of a multi-robot tractor system for agriculture field work , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[3]  S. Blackmore,et al.  Agricultural Robots Applications and Economic Perspectives , 2008 .

[4]  Diogenes L. Antille,et al.  Autonomous Technologies in Agricultural Equipment: A Review of the State of the Art , 2019, 2019 Agricultural Equipment Technology Conference.

[5]  Wesley J. Cole,et al.  Cost Projections for Utility-Scale Battery Storage , 2019 .

[6]  Giacomo Carli,et al.  6 th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment (HAICTA 2013) Drivers of Precision Agriculture Technologies Adoption: A Literature Review , 2013 .

[7]  H. Heise,et al.  German Farmers’ Attitudes on Adopting Autonomous Field Robots: An Empirical Survey , 2021, Agriculture.

[8]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Bringing the Farmer Perspective to Agricultural Robots , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  M. Ryan,et al.  Advancing Intercropping Research and Practices in Industrialized Agricultural Landscapes , 2018, Agriculture.

[10]  Simon Blackmore,et al.  Economics of robots and automation in field crop production , 2019, Precision Agriculture.

[11]  J M Siegford,et al.  Invited review: The impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cow management, behavior, health, and welfare. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  C. Williams Tackling undeclared work in the agricultural sector , 2018 .

[13]  S. Mann,et al.  The rationale of part-time farming: empirical evidence from Norway , 2017 .

[14]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  S. Kate Devitt,et al.  Cognitive factors that affect the adoption of autonomous agriculture , 2018, 2111.14092.

[16]  H. Heise,et al.  The AgTech Startup Perspective to Farmers Ex Ante Acceptance Process of Autonomous Field Robots , 2020 .

[17]  Dionysis Bochtis,et al.  Robotics and labour in agriculture. A context consideration , 2019, Biosystems Engineering.

[18]  S. Shearer,et al.  An economic feasibility assessment of autonomous field machinery in grain crop production , 2019, Precision Agriculture.

[19]  M. Mustonen,et al.  Forestry Statistics - Data 1990-2002. Eurostat Pocket books. Theme 5: Agriculture and Fisheries. European Commission. Office of Official Publications of the European Communities , 2003 .

[20]  N. Nachar The Mann ‐ Whitney U: A Test for Assessing Whether Two Independent Samples Come from the Same Distribution , 2007 .

[21]  Gonzalo Pajares,et al.  New Trends in Robotics for Agriculture: Integration and Assessment of a Real Fleet of Robots , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[22]  J. Lowenberg‐DeBoer,et al.  Precision Agriculture and Sustainability , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[23]  Dionysis Bochtis,et al.  A Case-Based Economic Assessment of Robotics Employment in Precision Arable Farming , 2019, Agronomy.

[24]  Claus G. Sørensen,et al.  Organic Farming Scenarios: Operational Analysis and Costs of implementing Innovative Technologies , 2005 .

[25]  Hans W. Griepentrog,et al.  Electric agricultural robot with multi-layer-control. , 2012 .

[26]  Evan D. G. Fraser,et al.  Automated pastures and the digital divide: How agricultural technologies are shaping labour and rural communities , 2019, Journal of Rural Studies.

[27]  Scott Mitchell,et al.  Farmlands with smaller crop fields have higher within-field biodiversity , 2015 .

[28]  Paul Vogel Datenhoheit in der Landwirtschaft 4.0 , 2020, GIL Jahrestagung.

[29]  Carl R. Dillon,et al.  Whole farm analysis of automatic section control for agricultural machinery , 2012, Precision Agriculture.