Determining Appropriate Accommodations for Postsecondary Students with Reading and Written Expression Disorders

One of the most significant barriers facing postsecondary students with reading and written expression disorders who are eligible to receive specific accommodations is the lack of professional knowledge pertaining to issues surrounding accommodations. Though guided by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, the process by which accommodation decisions are made varies considerably across institutions of higher education. Given the recent rise in litigation surrounding the practice of how accommodations are determined as well as the increasing number of postsecondary students with reading and writing disabilities who are requesting accommodations, it is imperative that accommodation decisions be defensible and supported by empirical research. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of current research on the effectiveness of accommodations for postsecondary students with language-based learning disabilities, discuss important considerations in the accommodation selection process, and offer recommendations for future research.

[1]  Andrew R. Brulle,et al.  Students with Learning Disabilities in Higher Education: Faculty Attitude and Practices. , 1999 .

[2]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: From research to practice , 1995, Annals of dyslexia.

[3]  K. Roberts,et al.  The use of voice recognition software as a compensatory strategy for postsecondary education students receiving services under the category of learning disabled , 2003 .

[4]  E. H. Alster,et al.  The Effects of Extended Time on Algebra Test Scores for College Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  Phyllis Levine,et al.  After High School: A First Look at the Postschool Experiences of Youth with Disabilities. A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). , 2005 .

[6]  M K Runyan,et al.  The Effect of Extra Time on Reading Comprehension Scores for University Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  Nonie K. Lesaux,et al.  The Effects of Timed and Untimed Testing Conditions on the Reading Comprehension Performance of Adults with Reading Disabilities , 2006 .

[8]  S. Alper,et al.  Postsecondary Education for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Literature , 2001 .

[9]  Terence Collins,et al.  The impact of microcomputer word processing on the performance of learning disabled students in a required first-year writing course , 1990 .

[10]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Helping Teachers Formulate Sound Test Accommodation Decisions for Students with Learning Disabilities , 2001 .

[11]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  Effects of Speech Synthesis on the Proofreading Efficiency of Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1995 .

[12]  B. Bateman,et al.  Learning Disabilities , 1992 .

[13]  Nicole S. Ofiesh,et al.  Evaluation Practices for College Students with LD , 2000, Journal of learning disabilities.

[14]  Christine Hamel,et al.  Writing Issues in College Students with Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Literature from 1990 to 2000 , 2003 .

[15]  Nicole S. Ofiesh,et al.  Using Speeded Cognitive, Reading, and Academic Measures to Determine the Need for Extended Test Time among University Students with Learning Disabilities , 2005 .

[16]  A. Liberman,et al.  Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S L Day,et al.  Assistive Technology For Postsecondary Students With Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  Brent Bridgeman,et al.  THE IMPACT OF EXTENDED TIME ON SAT® TEST PERFORMANCE , 2005 .

[19]  E. Edgar,et al.  The Postsecondary School Attendance and Completion Rates of High School Graduates With Learning Disabilities , 2000 .

[20]  G. Parks,et al.  Test Accommodations for Postsecondary Students: The Quandary Resulting From the ADA's Disability Definition. , 2005 .

[21]  Nicole S. Ofiesh.  Using Processing Speed Tests To Predict the Benefit of Extended Test Time for University Students with Learning Disabilities. , 2000 .

[22]  B. Shaywitz,et al.  A definition of dyslexia , 2003 .

[23]  G. Zuriff,et al.  Extra Examination Time for Students With Learning Disabilities: An Examination of the Maximum Potential Thesis , 2000 .

[24]  Stephen G. Sireci,et al.  Unlabeling the Disabled: A Perspective on Flagging Scores From Accommodated Test Administrations , 2005 .

[25]  L. Reetz,et al.  Modification Effects on Attributions of Middle School Students With Learning Disabilities , 2000 .

[26]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Using Objective Data Sources to Enhance Teacher Judgments about Test Accommodations , 2000 .