Reduced Adenoma Miss Rate With 9-Minute vs 6-Minute Withdrawal Times for Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Tandem Trial

INTRODUCTION: Although the 9-minute mean withdrawal time (m-WT) is often reported to be associated with the optimal adenoma detection rate (ADR), no randomized trials of screening colonoscopy have confirmed the impact of a 9-minute m-WT on adenoma miss rate (AMR) and ADR. METHODS: A multicenter tandem trial was conducted in 11 centers. Seven hundred thirty-three asymptomatic participants were randomized to receive segmental tandem screening colonoscopy with a 9-minute withdrawal, followed by a 6-minute withdrawal (9-minute-first group, 9MF, n = 366) or vice versa (6-minute-first group, 6MF, n = 367). The primary outcome was the lesion-level AMR. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that 9MF significantly reduced the lesion-level (14.5% vs 36.6%, P < 0.001) and participant-level AMR (10.9% vs 25.9%, P < 0.001), advanced adenoma miss rate (AAMR, 5.3% vs 46.9%, P = 0.002), multiple adenomas miss rate (20.7% vs 56.5%, P = 0.01), and high-risk adenomas miss rate (14.6% vs 39.5%, P = 0.01) of 6MF without compromising detection efficiency (P = 0.79). In addition, a lower false-negative rate for adenomas (P = 0.002) and high-risk adenomas (P < 0.05), and a lower rate of shortening surveillance schedule (P < 0.001) were also found in 9MF, accompanying with an improved ADR in the 9-minute vs 6-minute m-WT (42.3% vs 33.5%, P = 0.02). The independent inverse association between m-WT and AMR remained significant even after adjusting ADR, and meanwhile, 9-minute m-WT was identified as an independent protector for AMR and AAMR. DISCUSSION: In addition to increasing ADR, 9-minute m-WT also significantly reduces the AMR and AAMR of screening colonoscopy without compromising detection efficiency.

[1]  Christopher D. Jensen,et al.  Association of Physician Adenoma Detection Rates With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer. , 2022, JAMA.

[2]  Tarhini Hawraa,et al.  Impact of sedation type on adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy. , 2022, Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology.

[3]  R. Keswani,et al.  Interventions to improve adenoma detection rates for colonoscopy. , 2022, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  Z. Chen,et al.  Colorectal sessile serrated lesion detection using linked color imaging: A multicenter, parallel randomized controlled trial. , 2022, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[5]  Jing-Yuan Fang,et al.  Chinese consensus on prevention of colorectal neoplasia (2021, Shanghai) , 2022, Journal of digestive diseases.

[6]  V. Bansal,et al.  A comparison of 9‐min colonoscopy withdrawal time and 6‐min colonoscopy withdrawal time: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2021, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[7]  Seth D. Crockett,et al.  AGA Clinical Practice Update on Strategies to Improve Quality of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Expert Review. , 2021, Gastroenterology.

[8]  Shuchang Xu,et al.  The Impact of Sedation on Adenoma Detection Rate and Cecal Intubation Rate in Colonoscopy , 2020, Gastroenterology research and practice.

[9]  Sheng-Bing Zhao,et al.  Impact of 9-minute Withdrawal Time on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2020, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[10]  D. Ong,et al.  Two vs one forward view examination of right colon on adenoma detection: an international multicenter randomized trial. , 2020, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[11]  A. Jemal,et al.  Colonoscopy Outcomes in Average-Risk Screening Equivalent Young Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. , 2020, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[12]  C. Hur,et al.  Unsedated Colonoscopy: Impact on Quality Indicators , 2020, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[13]  T. Berzin,et al.  Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study. , 2020, Gastroenterology.

[14]  D. Adler,et al.  Impact of propofol sedation versus opioid/benzodiazepine sedation on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis , 2020, Endoscopy International Open.

[15]  C. Hassan,et al.  Designs of colonoscopic adenoma detection trials: more positive results with tandem than with parallel studies - an analysis of studies on imaging techniques and mechanical devices , 2020, Gut.

[16]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Association between improved adenoma detection rate and interval colorectal cancer rates after a quality improvement program. , 2020, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. , 2020, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[18]  W. Zhou,et al.  Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study. , 2020, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[19]  A. San Román,et al.  Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[20]  Sheng-Bing Zhao,et al.  Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2019, Gastroenterology.

[21]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Synthetic indicator of the impact of colorectal cancer screening programmes on incidence rates , 2019, Gut.

[22]  A. Amato,et al.  Linked color imaging reduces the miss rate of neoplastic lesions in the right colon: a randomized tandem colonoscopy study , 2018, Endoscopy.

[23]  Sheng-Bing Zhao,et al.  Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial , 2017, Endoscopy.

[24]  Paulina Wieszczy,et al.  Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. , 2017, Gastroenterology.

[25]  Subhas Banerjee,et al.  Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial. , 2017, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[26]  R. Pittayanon,et al.  The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate , 2016, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[27]  D. Robertson,et al.  Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions , 2015, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[28]  T. Church,et al.  Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy. , 2015, Gastroenterology.

[29]  Christopher D. Jensen,et al.  Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model. , 2015, JAMA.

[30]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes , 2015, Gut.

[31]  Charles J Kahi,et al.  Sessile serrated polyp prevalence determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate and an experienced pathologist. , 2015, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[32]  Muhammad F Dawwas,et al.  Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Ralph B D'Agostino,et al.  Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  Christopher I Amos,et al.  Serrated and Adenomatous Polyp Detection Increases With Longer Withdrawal Time: Results From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry , 2014, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[35]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Study designs to compare new colonoscopic techniques: clinical considerations, data analysis, and sample size calculations , 2013, Endoscopy.

[36]  Peter Lance,et al.  Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis , 2013, Gut.

[37]  Á. Lanas,et al.  Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. , 2013, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[38]  S. Moss,et al.  Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England , 2012, Endoscopy.

[39]  J. Sung,et al.  The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects , 2011, Gut.

[40]  R. Chuttani,et al.  Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[41]  R. Barclay,et al.  Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. , 2008, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[42]  J. Johanson,et al.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  Douglas K. Rex,et al.  Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[44]  J. Church,et al.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[45]  K. Triantafyllou,et al.  Characteristics of rectosigmoid adenomas as predictors of synchronous advanced proximal colon neoplasms. , 1996, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[46]  S. Stryker,et al.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. , 1987, Gastroenterology.

[47]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. , 1997, Gastroenterology.