Males adjust signaling effort based on female mate-preference cues

Female behavior involved in the expression of mate preferences often entails the production of cues that males may use to adjust their efforts and tactics, thus generating interactive back–and–forth reproductive dynamics. We investigated whether female duetting behavior in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) offers cues about how attractive females find signaling males and whether males modify their signaling behavior accordingly. Playback experiments with females of 4 Enchenopa species showed that stimulus attractiveness influenced the likelihood, duration, and dominant frequency of female signals. A separate playback experiment with males of 1 of the 4 species showed that they modified their behavior according to the features of female duetting signals: Males were more likely to signal and to produce more signals when presented with longer female signals of intermediate frequency. Because the female signals evoking the greatest male response did not correspond to conspecific signals, we conclude that males have been selected to attend to cues indicating likely female receptivity but not species identity. We discuss the consequences of these findings for assortative mating and reproductive isolation.

[1]  Charles S. Henry,et al.  Singing and cryptic speciation insects. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  W. Bailey Insect duets: underlying mechanisms and their evolution , 2003 .

[3]  G. Kozak,et al.  SEX DIFFERENCES IN MATE RECOGNITION AND CONSPECIFIC PREFERENCE IN SPECIES WITH MUTUAL MATE CHOICE , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  EXPERIENCE‐MEDIATED PLASTICITY IN MATE PREFERENCES: MATING ASSURANCE IN A VARIABLE ENVIRONMENT , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  R. Cocroft,et al.  Host shifts and signal divergence: mating signals covary with host use in a complex of specialized plant‐feeding insects , 2009 .

[6]  W. Eberhard EVIDENCE FOR WIDESPREAD COURTSHIP DURING COPULATION IN 131 SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  B. Cocroft,et al.  Host Shifts , the Evolution of Communication , and Speciation in the Enchenopa binotata Species Complex of Treehoppers , 2007 .

[8]  Meta Virant-Doberlet,et al.  Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[9]  R. Bonduriansky The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[10]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates , 2005 .

[11]  P. Narins Evolution of Anuran Chorus Behavior: Neural and Behavioral Constraints , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[12]  K. G. A. Hamilton,et al.  Establishing the Identity of Existing Names in the North American Enchenopa binotata Species Complex of Treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) , 2009 .

[13]  R. Cocroft,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication , 2005 .

[14]  Louise S. Mead,et al.  Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. , 1985, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  T. Clutton‐Brock Sexual selection in females , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  E. Hebets,et al.  Modality-specific experience with female feedback increases the efficacy of courtship signalling in male wolf spiders , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  R. Prum THE LANDE–KIRKPATRICK MECHANISM IS THE NULL MODEL OF EVOLUTION BY INTERSEXUAL SELECTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MEANING, HONESTY, AND DESIGN IN INTERSEXUAL SIGNALS , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  J. Kålås,et al.  Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  A. Peretti,et al.  Copulatory dialogue: female spiders sing during copulation to influence male genitalic movements , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  M. West-Eberhard Sexual Selection, Social Competition, and Speciation , 1983, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[21]  이재복 의사 간호사 communication , 2011 .

[22]  G. Patricelli,et al.  Sexual selection: Male displays adjusted to female's response , 2002, Nature.

[23]  T. Balsby,et al.  Female behaviour affects male courtship in whitethroats, Sylvia communis: an interactive experiment using visual and acoustic cues , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  T. Amundsen,et al.  Why are female birds ornamented? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  A. Peretti,et al.  Signalling and Sexual Conflict: Female Spiders Use Stridulation to Inform Males of Sexual Receptivity , 2011 .

[27]  M. Herberstein,et al.  Spider Behaviour: Flexibility And Versatility , 2011 .

[28]  R. Cocroft,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF FEMALE CHOICE, MALE–MALE COMPETITION, AND SIGNAL TRANSMISSION AS CAUSES OF SELECTION ON MALE MATING SIGNALS , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  T. Clutton‐Brock Sexual Selection in Males and Females , 2007, Science.

[30]  T. K. Wood,et al.  DIVERGENCE IN THE ENCHENOPA BINOTATA SAY COMPLEX (HOMOPTERA: MEMBRACIDAE) EFFECTED BY HOST PLANT ADAPTATION , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  M. Siva-jothy,et al.  Genital damage, kicking and early death , 2000, Nature.

[32]  R. MacLaren,et al.  Male preference for a subtle posture cue that signals spawning readiness in female sticklebacks , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  R. L. Rodríguez Possible Female Choice During Copulation in Ozophora baranowskii (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae): Female Behavior, Multiple Copulations, and Sperm Transfer , 1998, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[34]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  Male satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus, adjust their display intensity in response to female startling: an experiment with robotic females , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  A. King,et al.  Social Guidance of Vocal Learning by Female Cowbirds: Validating its Functional Significance , 2010 .

[36]  Reginald B. Cocroft,et al.  Divergence in Female Duetting Signals in the Enchenopa binotata Species Complex of Treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) , 2006 .

[37]  R. Cocroft Insect vibrational defence signals , 1996, Nature.

[38]  R. Cocroft,et al.  Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  André A. Fernandez,et al.  Head over heels: an examination of a possible mating signal in female swordtails, Xiphophorus cortezi , 2008, Animal Behaviour.