The effect of a human agent’s external regulation upon college students’ hypermedia learning

In this study we examined the effectiveness of self-regulated learning (SRL) and externally regulated learning (ERL) on college students’ learning about a science topic with hypermedia during a 40-min session. A total of 82 college students with little knowledge of the topic were randomly assigned either to the SRL or ERL condition. Students in the SRL condition regulated their own learning, while students in the ERL condition had access to a human tutor who facilitated their self-regulated learning. We converged product (pretest–posttest declarative knowledge and qualitative shifts in participants’ mental models) with process (think-aloud) data to examine the effectiveness of SRL versus ERL. Analysis of the declarative knowledge measures showed that the ERL condition group mean was statistically significantly higher than the group mean for the SRL condition on the labeling and flow diagram tasks. There were no statistically significant differences between groups on the matching task, but both groups showed statistically significant increases in performance. Further analyses showed that the odds of being in a higher mental model posttest group were decreased by 65% for the SRL group as compared to the ERL group. In terms of SRL behavior, participants in the SRL condition engaged in more use of selecting new information sources, re-reading, summarizing, free searching, and enacting control over the context of their learning. In comparison, the ERL participants engaged in more activation of prior knowledge, utilization of feeling of knowing and judgment of learning, monitoring their progress toward goals, drawing, hypothesizing, coordination of information sources, and expressing task difficulty.

[1]  Joshua Aronson.  Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education , 2002 .

[2]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[3]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[4]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. , 1989 .

[5]  J. Greene,et al.  Adolescents' Use of Self-Regulatory Processes and Their Relation to Qualitative Mental Model Shifts While Using Hypermedia , 2006, ICLS.

[6]  R. Azevedo,et al.  A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin’s Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions , 2007 .

[7]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .

[8]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia , 2000 .

[9]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[10]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students' use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Adaptive Human Scaffolding Facilitates Adolescents’ Self-regulated Learning with Hypermedia , 2005 .

[12]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  LEARNING FROM HYPERTEXT: RESEARCH ISSUES AND FINDINGS , 2004 .

[13]  Thomas A. Keenan.  Computers and education , 1964, CACM.

[14]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  The Relationship between Prior Knowledge and Interactive Overviews during Hypermedia-Aided Learning , 1999 .

[15]  Kallen E. Tsikalas,et al.  Can Computer-Based Learning Environments (CBLEs) Be Used as Self-Regulatory Tools to Enhance Learning? , 2005 .

[16]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[17]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[18]  R. Azevedo.  Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[19]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[20]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  The Role of Goal Structure in Undergraduates’ Use of Self-Regulatory Variables in Two Hypermedia Learning Tasks , 2006 .

[21]  B. Zimmerman.  Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[22]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. , 2002 .

[23]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking during Experts' Performance on Representative Tasks , 2006 .

[24]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? , 2008 .

[25]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[26]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development , 2005 .

[27]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding , 2005 .

[28]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor , 1999, Cognitive Systems Research.

[29]  B. Zimmerman.  Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis , 2001 .

[30]  Barbara A. Fox.  The Human Tutorial Dialogue Project: Issues in the Design of instructional Systems , 1993 .

[31]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Environments , 2006 .

[32]  P. Pintrich.  The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[33]  Takashi Yamauchi,et al.  Learning from human tutoring , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Alfred DeMaris,et al.  Regression With Social Data: Modeling Continuous and Limited Response Variables , 2004 .

[35]  M. Chi.  Constructing Self-Explanations and Scaffolded Explanations in Tutoring , 1996 .

[36]  M. Chi,et al.  Can Tutors Monitor Students' Understanding Accurately? , 2004 .

[37]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Scaffolding Deep Comprehension Strategies Through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART , 2005 .

[38]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. , 2001 .

[39]  R. Azevedo.  Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning , 2005 .

[40]  R. Azevedo,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students' Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia , 2004 .

[41]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? , 2004 .

[42]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: Using computers as METAcognitive tools to enhance learning? , 2002 .

[43]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[44]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[45]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[46]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .