Assessment of benefit in tele-ophthalmology using a consensus panel

A videoconferencing link was established from a hospital in South Africa to Moorfields Eye Hospital in London. A clinician in South Africa used a video slit-lamp and videoconferencing equipment to capture images and communicate with a specialist in London. Over 12 months, 113 cases were discussed in teleconsultations. Case-notes were subsequently obtained for 90 cases (80%). Three consultant ophthalmologists took part in the consensus process, one from the UK and two from South Africa. The consensus panel achieved on average 78–96% agreement on the items rated. In approximately half the cases, the panel judged that teleconsultation had had an effect on diagnosis. In nine cases (10%) there was potential for definite improvement in visual health as a result of tele-ophthalmology and in a further 48 cases (53%) there was potential for possible improvement in visual health. The consensus process identified 35 cases (39%) where there was potential improvement in general health as a result of tele-ophthalmology. Despite the methodological limitations of our approach, it was possible to learn a great deal about the effectiveness of the telemedicine intervention.

[1]  R. Roine,et al.  Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[2]  P. Whitten,et al.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  T. Williamson,et al.  Telemedicine and computers in diabetic retinopathy screening , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  D M Marcus,et al.  Telemedicine diagnosis of eye disorders by direct ophthalmoscopy. A pilot study. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[5]  P. Taylor,et al.  A survey of research in telemedicine. 1: Telemedicine systems , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  Ran Giladi,et al.  A pilot study of tele-ophthalmology outreach services to primary care , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  J. Sisk,et al.  A proposed framework for economic evaluation of telemedicine. , 1998, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[8]  I. Murdoch,et al.  Postoperative evaluation of patients following ophthalmic surgery , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  P M Wortman,et al.  Consensus Among Experts and Research Synthesis: A Comparison of Methods , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  D J Vassallo,et al.  An evaluation of the first year's experience with a low-cost telemedicine link in Bangladesh , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[11]  H Lamminen,et al.  A cost study of teleconsultation for primary-care ophthalmology and dermatology , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[12]  K. Vella,et al.  Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  N Blackwell,et al.  The use of telemedicine to treat ophthalmological emergencies in rural Australia , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  P. Taylor,et al.  A survey of research in telemedicine. 2: Telemedicine services , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[15]  N. Black,et al.  Consensus Development Methods: A Review of Best Practice in Creating Clinical Guidelines , 1999, Journal of health services research & policy.