Strategic IS alignment: the necessity for a hybrid framework linking shared vision, leadership, change management and diffusion theory

The rapid pace of business process change, partially fueled by information technology, is placing increasingly difficult demands on the organization. In many industries, organizations are required to evaluate and assess new information technologies and their organization-specific strategic potential, in order to remain competitive. The scanning, adoption and diffusion of this information technology must be carefully guided by strong strategic and technological leadership in order to infuse the organization and its members with strategic and technological visions, and to coordinate their diverse and decentralized expertise. This view of technological diffusion requires us to look beyond individuals and individual adoption, toward other levels of analysis and social theoretical viewpoints to promote the appropriate and heedful diffusion of often organization-wide information technologies. Particularly important is an examination of the diffusion champions and how a feasible and shared vision of the business and information technology can be created and communicated across organizational communities in order to unify, motivate and mobilize technology change process. The feasibility of this shared vision depends on its strategic fit and whether the shared vision is properly aligned with organizational objectives in order to filter and shape technological choice and diffusion. Shared vision is viewed as an organizational barometer for assessing the appropriateness of future technologies amidst a sea of overwhelming possibilities. We present a theoretical model to address an extended program of research focusing on important phases during diffusion, shared vision, change management and social alignment. We also make a call for further research into these theoretical linkages and into the development of feasible shared visions.

[1]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Issues in information systems planning , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Root Causes of Strategic Information Systems Planning Implementation Problems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[4]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[5]  V BrownCarol,et al.  Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise , 1994 .

[6]  T. M. CHARLTON Civil Engineering , 1961, Nature.

[7]  William R. King,et al.  Integration between Business Planning and Information Systems Planning: An Evolutionary-Contingency Perspective , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..

[9]  Michael A. Hignite,et al.  Assessment of the Relationships between the Computer Attitudes and Computer Literacy Levels of Prospective Educators , 1992 .

[10]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[11]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Relationships between Organizational and Information Systems Objectives: Some Empirical Evidence , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  G. Hamel Leading the Revolution , 2000 .

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Technology Competence of Business Managers: A Definition and Research Model , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[16]  John Voeller 25 Technologies to Watch , 2001 .

[17]  James R. Francisco,et al.  Strategic Information Systems Alignment in the Health Care Industry , 2004 .

[18]  A. Shani,et al.  IT and the Learning Organization : Exploring Myths of Change , 2001 .

[19]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[20]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[21]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[22]  John Voeller Technologies to watch , 2001 .

[23]  R. Buderi,et al.  IN SEARCH OF INNOVATION , 1999 .

[24]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Goin beyond traditional motivational and behavioral approaches , 1998 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[27]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .