The jury is still out: Psychoemotional support in peer e-mentoring for transition to university

Abstract This study investigates how computer mediated communication (CMC) can sustain nourishing and emotionally enriching peer mentoring relations. A peer electronic mentoring program was implemented in an Irish university to facilitate freshmen's transition to college. A sample of 123 participants (42 mentors and 81 mentees) was evaluated with a combination of mixed methods including a pre-program adjustment scale, online participation records, content analysis of online interactions and end of program interviews. Results reveal that volunteer freshmen experienced greater psychoemotional needs than the general student population. Personal and emotional interactions often developed, especially if the mentoring pair met face-to-face first and the fresher did not have an alternative support network. However, mentors often expected to develop intimate and lasting support relationships while mentees did not always share this expectation. Perceptions of CMC were strongly determined by individual preferences. Implications for e-mentoring programs and Web 2.0 use are discussed.

[1]  M. Weiler,et al.  Software support for online mentoring programs: a research‐inspired design , 2005 .

[2]  M. Rein,et al.  The Evaluation of Broad-Aim Programs: A Cautionary Case and a Moral , 1969 .

[3]  G. Crisp,et al.  Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007 , 2009 .

[4]  Gunnar Augustsson.  Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[5]  Chuck Huff,et al.  The on-line voyeur: Promises and pitfalls of observing electronic interaction , 1989 .

[6]  Greg Jones,et al.  A Descriptive Study of Telementoring among Students, Subject Matter Experts, and Teachers: Message Flow and Function Patterns , 1999 .

[7]  R. Baker,et al.  Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire , 2011 .

[8]  Becky Wai-Ling Packard,et al.  Web-based Mentoring: Challenging traditional models to increase women's access , 2003 .

[9]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  E-Mentoring for All , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  M. Morley,et al.  Welcome to College? Developing a Richer Understanding of the Transition Process for Adult First Year Students Using Reflective Written Journals , 2007 .

[11]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Stages of Student Departure: Reflections on the Longitudinal Character of Student Leaving , 1988 .

[12]  Ercan Top,et al.  Blogging as a social medium in undergraduate courses: Sense of community best predictor of perceived learning , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  D. Kevin O'Neill,et al.  Building Social Capital in a Knowledge-Building Community: Telementoring as a Catalyst , 2004, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[14]  W. Williams,et al.  The Politics of Evaluation: The Case of Head Start , 1969 .

[15]  Candace Figg,et al.  Participating from the sidelines, online: facilitating telementoring projects , 2000, AJCD.

[16]  Terri A. Scandura,et al.  E-mentoring: Implications for organizational learning and development in a wired world , 2003 .

[17]  Steffen Svendsen.  OECD REVIEW OF CAREER GUIDANCE POLICIES , 2002 .

[18]  Susan A. Brown.  Seeing Web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Anita L. Blanchard,et al.  Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research , 2003 .

[20]  Nuria Manzano Soto,et al.  Evaluación de un modelo de orientación tutorial y mentoría en la Educación Superior a distancia , 2011 .

[21]  B E Puetz,et al.  Evaluation research. , 1982, Journal of continuing education in nursing.

[22]  Dave Harley,et al.  Using texting to support students’ transition to university , 2007 .

[23]  Benjamin H. Detenber,et al.  Getting to Know You: Exploring the Development of Relational Intimacy in Computer-mediated Communication , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Julian Gosland,et al.  “There's magic in the web”: e‐mentoring for women's career development , 2005 .

[25]  M. Roblyer,et al.  Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[26]  S. Merriam,et al.  E-mentoring: Using Computer Mediated Communication to Enhance the Mentoring Process , 2002 .

[27]  N. Leech,et al.  An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation. , 2007 .

[28]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Interactivity Between Protégés and Scientists in an Electronic Mentoring Program , 2006 .

[29]  Carol H. Weiss.  Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness , 1972 .

[30]  Peter Tomlinson,et al.  Having it Both Ways: hierarchical focusing as research interview method , 1989 .

[31]  H. Dewart,et al.  Peer E-Mentoring: Enhancement of the First Year Experience , 2006 .

[32]  A. Astin.  Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. , 1999 .

[33]  R. Harrington,et al.  MBTI personality type and other factors that relate to preference for online versus face-to-face instruction , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[34]  MENTORING AND THE TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION How Face-To-Face Mentoring Sets the Stage for E-Mentoring , 2005 .

[35]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Toward Reform of Program Evaluation , 1981 .