Multifaceted adaptation of the neural decision process with prior knowledge of time constraints and stimulus probability

When selecting actions in response to noisy sensory stimuli, the brain can exploit prior knowledge of time constraints, stimulus discriminability and stimulus probability to hone the decision process. Although behavioral models typically explain such effects through adjustments to decision criteria only, the full range of underlying neural process adjustments remains to be established. Here, we draw on human neurophysiological signals reflecting decision formation to construct and constrain a multi-tiered model of prior-informed motion discrimination, in which a motor-independent representation of cumulative evidence feeds build-to-threshold motor signals that receive additional dynamic urgency and bias signal components. The neurally-informed model not only provides a superior quantitative fit to prior-biased behavior across three distinct task regimes (easy, time-pressured and weak evidence), but also reveals adjustments to evidence accumulation rate, urgency rate, and the timing of accumulation onset and motor execution which go undetected or are discrepant in more standard diffusion-model analysis of behavior.

[1]  S. Kelly,et al.  A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[3]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Fitting the ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Braden A Purcell,et al.  RELATING ACCUMULATOR MODEL PARAMETERS AND NEURAL DYNAMICS. , 2017, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[6]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Temporal expectation and information processing: A model-based analysis , 2012, Cognition.

[7]  Gaurav Malhotra,et al.  Overcoming Indecision by Changing the Decision Boundary , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Tobias Teichert,et al.  The importance of decision onset. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  A. Blangero,et al.  Dynamic Interplay of Value and Sensory Information in High-Speed Decision Making , 2018, Current Biology.

[10]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Decision-making with multiple alternatives , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  KongFatt Wong-Lin,et al.  Bridging Neural and Computational Viewpoints on Perceptual Decision-Making , 2018, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Decision making by urgency gating: theory and experimental support. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Daniel P. Newman,et al.  Target Selection Signals Influence Perceptual Decisions by Modulating the Onset and Rate of Evidence Accumulation , 2016, Current Biology.

[16]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff , 2012, Neuron.

[17]  E. Salinas,et al.  Perceptual decision making in less than 30 milliseconds , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Brandon M. Turner,et al.  Some task demands induce collapsing bounds: Evidence from a behavioral analysis , 2018, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[19]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Elapsed Decision Time Affects the Weighting of Prior Probability in a Perceptual Decision Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Simon P. Kelly,et al.  Decisions are expedited through multiple neural adjustments spanning the sensorimotor hierarchy , 2017, Nature Communications.

[21]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Simon P. Kelly,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Selective Decision Signals Exhibit Qualitatively Distinct Dynamics before Delayed Perceptual Reports , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Urgency, Leakage, and the Relative Nature of Information Processing in Decision-making , 2019, bioRxiv.

[24]  S. Kelly,et al.  The classic P300 encodes a build‐to‐threshold decision variable , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[26]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  Roozbeh Kiani,et al.  A neural mechanism of speed-accuracy tradeoff in macaque area LIP , 2014, eLife.

[28]  H. Lau,et al.  Prestimulus Oscillatory Activity over Motor Cortex Reflects Perceptual Expectations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  Cortical Components of Reaction-Time during Perceptual Decisions in Humans , 2015, PloS one.

[30]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Lateralized Readiness Potentials Reveal Properties of a Neural Mechanism for Implementing a Decision Threshold , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  Simon P. Kelly,et al.  The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty , 2019, bioRxiv.

[32]  A. Voss,et al.  Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Gaurav Malhotra,et al.  Time-varying decision boundaries: insights from optimality analysis , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Jürgen Kayser,et al.  Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  Why more is better: Simultaneous modeling of EEG, fMRI, and behavioral data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[36]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[37]  A. Pouget,et al.  The Cost of Accumulating Evidence in Perceptual Decision Making , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: A DMAT primer , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[39]  E. Salinas,et al.  Motor selection dynamics in FEF explain the reaction time variance of saccades to single targets , 2017, bioRxiv.

[40]  R. Bogacz,et al.  The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Buildup of Choice-Predictive Activity in Human Motor Cortex during Perceptual Decision Making , 2009, Current Biology.

[42]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  The Neural and Computational Basis of Controlled Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff during Task Performance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[44]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[46]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Bias in the Brain: A Diffusion Model Analysis of Prior Probability and Potential Payoff , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Perceptual Decision Making in Rodents, Monkeys, and Humans , 2017, Neuron.

[48]  Peter I. Frazier,et al.  Sequential Hypothesis Testing under Stochastic Deadlines , 2007, NIPS.

[49]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The role of passing time in decision-making. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neural chronometry and coherency across speed–accuracy demands reveal lack of homomorphism between computational and neural mechanisms of evidence accumulation , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments , 2015, eLife.

[52]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Comparing fixed and collapsing boundary versions of the diffusion model. , 2016, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[53]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Decoupling speed and accuracy in an urgent decision-making task reveals multiple contributions to their trade-off , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[54]  Nathan J Evans,et al.  A parameter recovery assessment of time-variant models of decision-making , 2019, Behavior research methods.

[55]  Guy E. Hawkins,et al.  When humans behave like monkeys: Feedback delays and extensive practice increase the efficiency of speeded decisions , 2019, Cognition.

[56]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Filter Effects and Filter Artifacts in the Analysis of Electrophysiological Data , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[57]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[58]  Franck Vidal,et al.  The nature of unilateral motor commands in between-hand choice tasks as revealed by surface Laplacian estimation. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[59]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  Niels A. Kloosterman,et al.  Dynamic modulation of decision biases by brainstem arousal systems , 2017, eLife.

[61]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  The Quality of Response Time Data Inference: A Blinded, Collaborative Assessment of the Validity of Cognitive Models , 2018, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[64]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods , 2015, Psychological research.

[65]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Revisiting the Evidence for Collapsing Boundaries and Urgency Signals in Perceptual Decision-Making , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Integration of Sensory and Reward Information during Perceptual Decision-Making in Lateral Intraparietal Cortex (LIP) of the Macaque Monkey , 2010, PloS one.

[67]  R. Marois,et al.  fMRI Evidence for a Dual Process Account of the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Decision-Making , 2008, PloS one.

[68]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[69]  KongFatt Wong-Lin,et al.  Dynamic Excitatory and Inhibitory Gain Modulation Can Produce Flexible, Robust and Optimal Decision-making , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[70]  Constant D. Beugré,et al.  The neural basis of decision making , 2018 .

[71]  Rani Moran,et al.  Optimal decision making in heterogeneous and biased environments , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[72]  Peter R Murphy,et al.  Global gain modulation generates time-dependent urgency during perceptual choice in humans , 2016, Nature Communications.

[73]  S. Link,et al.  A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .

[74]  S. Kelly,et al.  Internal and External Influences on the Rate of Sensory Evidence Accumulation in the Human Brain , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[76]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[77]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Why jackknifing yields good latency estimates. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[78]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Changing your mind: a computational mechanism of vacillation , 2009, Nature.

[79]  A. Osman,et al.  On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[80]  Anne E. Urai,et al.  Choice History Biases Subsequent Evidence Accumulation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[81]  Borís Burle,et al.  Beyond decision! Motor contribution to speed–accuracy trade-off in decision-making , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[82]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[83]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the reward rate optimality of collapsing decision criteria , 2019, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[84]  Joshua J. Tremel,et al.  Prior probability and feature predictability interactively bias perceptual decisions , 2014, Neuropsychologia.