Analysis of Control Conflict between UPFC Multiple Control Functions and Their Interaction Indicator

Interactions among multiple control functions of a UPFC installed in a power system have been observed in power system simulation and been reported in authors' previous publications (1,2). This paper presents new analytical results about these observed interactions and concludes that they are due to the control conflict between the series and shunt part of the UPFC, which are connected through the internal common capacitor inside the UPFC. Investigation in the paper reveals, for the first time as far as the authors are aware of, that the linkage pattern of UPFC series and shunt part decides whether the control functions implemented by the UPFC series and shunt part conflict each other or not. This linkage pattern of UPFC series and shunt part can be described by the flow of active power through the UPFC at steady-state operation of the power system. Hence in order to predict the possible interactions among multiple control functions of the UPFC, an interaction indicator is proposed in the paper which is the direction and amount of active power flow through the internal link of the UPFC series and shunt part at steady-state operation of the power system. This proposed interaction indicator can be calculated from power system load flow solution without having to run simulation of the power system with UPFC controllers installed. By using the indicator, the interactions among multiple control functions of the UPFC caused by badly set controller's parameters are excluded. Therefore the indicator only identifies the possible existence of inherent control conflict of the UPFC.

[1]  Tarlochan S. Sidhu,et al.  A Modern Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme , 2005 .

[2]  Mehrdad Ghandhari,et al.  Use of UPFC for optimal power flow control , 1997 .

[3]  Udaya Annakkage,et al.  Effects of unified power flow controllers on transient stability , 1998 .

[4]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Power flow control by use of controllable series components , 1993 .

[5]  D. Z. Fang,et al.  Application of the injection modeling approach to power flow analysis for systems with unified power flow controller , 2001 .

[6]  H. F. Wang,et al.  Damping function of unified power flow controller , 1999 .

[7]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  Power flow control and power flow studies for systems with FACTS devices , 1998 .

[8]  A. T. Johns,et al.  Investigation into the dynamic interactions of multiple multifunctional unified power flow controllers , 2000 .

[9]  H. F. Wang,et al.  Interactions and multivariable design of multiple control functions of a unified power flow controller , 2002 .

[10]  H. F. Wang,et al.  Applications of modelling UPFC into multi-machine power systems , 1999 .

[11]  P. Ashmole,et al.  Flexible AC transmission systems , 1995 .

[12]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Unified power-flow control concept for flexible AC transmission systems , 1992 .

[13]  Qiu Xiao-gang,et al.  BASIC CONTROL OF UNIFIED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER , 2003 .

[14]  M. R. Iravani,et al.  Steady-state and dynamic models of unified power flow controller (UPFC) for power system studies , 1996 .

[15]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  POWER FLOW CONTROL AND POWER FLOWST~~ES FOR SYSTE~S FACTS DEVICES , 1998 .

[16]  J. Penman,et al.  Dynamic modelling of a unified power flow controller , 1997 .

[17]  Tao Yu,et al.  Coordinated Control of TCSC and SVC for System Damping Enhancement , 2005 .

[18]  Ali Feliachi,et al.  On the Control of Re-Structured Electric Power Systems , 2005 .

[19]  C. Fuerte-Esquivel,et al.  Unified power flow controller: a critical comparison of Newton-Raphson UPFC algorithms in power flow studies , 1997 .

[20]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Flexible AC transmission systems , 2006 .