The burden of neurothrombectomy call: a multicenter prospective study

Introduction Neurothrombectomy frequency is increasing, and a better understanding of the neurothrombectomy call burden is needed. Methods Neurointerventional physicians at nine participating stroke centers prospectively recorded time requirements for all neurothrombectomy (NT) consultations over 30 consecutive 24 hour call periods. Results Data were collected from a total of 270 days of call. 214 NT consultations were reported (mean 0.79 per day), including 130 ‘false positive’ consultations that ultimately did not lead to thrombectomy (mean 0.48 per day). 84 NT procedures were performed at the nine centers (0.32 per day, or 1 every 3 days). Most (59.8%) consultations occurred between 5pm and 7am. 30% of thrombectomy procedures resulted in delays in scheduled cases; treating physicians had to emergently travel to the hospital for 51.2% of these cases. A median of 27 min was spent on each false positive consultation and 171 min on each thrombectomy. Overall, the median physician time spent on NT responsibilities per 24 hour call period was 69 min (mean 85 min; IQR 16–135 min). Conclusions NT consultations are frequent and often disrupt physician schedules, requiring physicians to commute in from home after hours in the majority of cases. As procedural and consultation volumes increase, it is crucial to understand the significant burden of call on neurointerventional physicians and develop strategies that reduce the potential for burnout. Importantly, this study was performed prior to the completion of the DAWN and DEFUSE3 trials; NT consultations are expected to continue to increase in the future.

[1]  W. Ryu,et al.  Effect of the Number of Neurointerventionalists on Off‐Hour Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 12 Hours of Symptom Onset , 2019, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[2]  V. Pereira,et al.  ADAPT technique with ACE68 and ACE64 reperfusion catheters in ischemic stroke treatment: results from the PROMISE study , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[3]  E. Lindsay Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct , 2018 .

[4]  R. Starke,et al.  DEFUSE-3 Trial: Reinforcing Evidence for Extended Endovascular Intervention Time Window for Ischemic Stroke. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[5]  M. Chen,et al.  Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Hirsch,et al.  DAWN: another brand new day , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[7]  N. Sathnur,et al.  257 - American Heart Association Abstracts to Manuscripts—Barriers to Publication , 2017 .

[8]  K. Fargen,et al.  A multicenter study evaluating the frequency and time requirement of mechanical thrombectomy , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[9]  A. Rai,et al.  A population-based incidence of acute large vessel occlusions and thrombectomy eligible patients indicates significant potential for growth of endovascular stroke therapy in the USA , 2016, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[10]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Mechanical Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcomes Independent of Pretreatment With Intravenous Thrombolysis , 2016, Stroke.

[11]  K. Fargen,et al.  A survey of neurointerventionalists on thrombectomy practices for emergent large vessel occlusions , 2016, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[12]  J. Ferro,et al.  Endovascular treatment versus medical care alone for ischaemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[13]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Time to Reperfusion and Treatment Effect for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA neurology.

[14]  C. Sorensen,et al.  Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke , 2015 .

[15]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  H. Diener,et al.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  P. Meyers,et al.  Embolectomy for stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery , 2015, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[18]  M. Krause,et al.  Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  K. Fargen,et al.  Thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: an evidence-based treatment , 2015, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[20]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  K. Fargen,et al.  Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke is indicated and evidence based: a position statement , 2014, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[22]  J. Blankenship,et al.  Reimbursement for coronary intervention , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[23]  L. Schwamm,et al.  Case volumes of intra-arterial and intravenous treatment of ischemic stroke in the USA , 2009, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[24]  Christopher S. Coffey,et al.  Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment , 2015 .

[25]  B. Peng,et al.  Treatment for acute ischemic stroke: new evidence from China. , 2013, Chinese medical journal.