Inter- and intra-dimensional dependencies in implicit phonotactic learning

Abstract Is phonological learning subject to the same inductive biases as learning in other domains? Previous studies of non-linguistic learning found that intra-dimensional dependencies (between two instances of the same feature) were learned more easily than inter-dimensional ones. This study compares implicit learning of intra- and inter-dimensional phonotactic dependencies. A series of six unsupervised implicit-learning experiments shows that a pattern based on agreement between two instances of the same feature is easier to learn than one based on correlation between instances of two different features. The results are interpreted as evidence for domain-general restrictions on the form of domain-specific learning primitives.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  J. Mehler,et al.  Finding Words and Rules in a Speech Stream , 2008, Psychological science.

[3]  Sanford A. Schane,et al.  On the psychological reality of a natural rule of syllable structure , 1975, Cognition.

[4]  Alejandrina Cristia,et al.  Phonological features in infancy , 2011 .

[5]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology , 2008 .

[6]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[7]  Andrew Nevins,et al.  Two Case Studies in Phonological Universals: A View from Artificial Grammars , 2010, Biolinguistics.

[8]  Kristine H Onishi,et al.  A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Seong-soo Lee The role of memory aids in two instructional paradigms: Learning and utilization of logical rules , 1981 .

[10]  John Alderete,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology: Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon , 2007 .

[11]  Angela C. Carpenter A naturalness bias in learning stress* , 2010, Phonology.

[12]  E. Moreton Analytic bias and phonological typology* , 2008, Phonology.

[13]  R. Shepard,et al.  Learning and memorization of classifications. , 1961 .

[14]  Alejandrina Cristia,et al.  Is Infants' Learning of Sound Patterns Constrained by Phonological Features? , 2008 .

[15]  S. Pinker Formal models of language learning , 1979, Cognition.

[16]  D. Medin,et al.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. , 2004, Psychological review.

[17]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning , 2000, Nature.

[19]  M. Cole,et al.  A developmental and cross-cultural study of the influences of rule structure and problem composition on the learning of conceptual classifications , 1973 .

[20]  Osamu Fujimura,et al.  Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation , 1993 .

[21]  Conceptual rule learning and chronological age. , 1971 .

[22]  Laura Walsh Dickey The phonology of liquids , 1997 .

[23]  P. R. Laughlin Focusing strategy for eight concept rules. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Kristine H. Onishi,et al.  Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience , 2003, Cognition.

[25]  Gunnar Ólafur Hansson,et al.  Diachronic Explanations of Sound Patterns , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[26]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  An Effort Based Approach to Consonant Lenition , 2001 .

[27]  R. L. Gottwald Effects of Response Labels in Concept Attainment. , 1971 .

[28]  Paul Boersma Functional Optimality Theory , 1997 .

[29]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry , 1969 .

[30]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An introduction to Japanese phonology , 1987 .

[31]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[32]  George N. Clements,et al.  The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[33]  Elliott Moreton,et al.  Underphonologization and Modularity Bias , 2006 .

[34]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  The role of phonetic naturalness in phonological rule acquisition , 2006 .

[35]  P. Boersma,et al.  Convergence Properties of a Gradual Learning Algorithm for Harmonic Grammar , 2013 .

[36]  Paul de Lacy,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology , 2012 .

[37]  Joe Pater Gradual Learning and Convergence , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[38]  J. Saffran Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[39]  S. Frisch,et al.  The Psychological Reality of OCP-Place in Arabic , 2001 .

[40]  C. Fisher,et al.  Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience , 2002, Cognition.

[41]  Nicole Falkenhayner Dissimilation , 2013, Die Integrationsdebatte zwischen Assimilation und Diversität.

[42]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization. , 1991 .

[43]  Elliott Moreton,et al.  Structure and Substance in Artificial-phonology Learning, Part I: Structure , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[44]  Marina Nespor,et al.  The quest for generalizations over consonants: Asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  J. Orbach Principles of Neurodynamics. Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms. , 1962 .

[46]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[47]  Two perceptual variables in within-event learning , 1986 .

[48]  G. Dell,et al.  Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in language production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[50]  J. Feldman An algebra of human concept learning , 2006 .

[51]  Tests of Analytic Bias in Native Mandarin Speakers and Native Southern Min Speakers , 2010 .

[52]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Perceptual constraints in phonotactic learning. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Pawel M. Nowak,et al.  Phonological Rule-Learning and Its Implications for a Theory of Vowel Harmony , 2003 .

[54]  J. McCarthy OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination , 1986 .

[55]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[56]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[57]  Li-Jen Kuo,et al.  The Role of Natural Class Features in the Acquisition of Phonotactic Regularities , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[58]  Rachel Walker,et al.  A Typology of Consonant Agreement as Correspondence , 2004 .

[59]  P. G. Arnold,et al.  Perceptual conditions affecting ease of association. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Order of consideration of different types of concepts. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  Colin Wilson,et al.  Learning Phonology With Substantive Bias: An Experimental and Computational Study of Velar Palatalization , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[62]  B. Hayes,et al.  Natural and Unnatural Constraints in Hungarian Vowel Harmony , 2009 .

[63]  S. Pinker,et al.  The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) , 2005, Cognition.

[64]  Vsevolod Kapatsinski Modularity in the Channel: The Link between Separability of Features and Learnability of Dependencies between Them , 2011, ICPhS.

[65]  N. Balakrishnan,et al.  A Primer on Statistical Distributions , 2003 .

[66]  R. Rescorla A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[67]  J. McCarthy Feature Geometry and Dependency: A Review , 1988 .

[68]  U. Neisser,et al.  Hierarchies in concept attainment. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[69]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Adaptation to Novel Accents: Feature-Based Learning of Context-Sensitive Phonological Regularities , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[70]  Lyle Campbell,et al.  Historical Linguistics: An Introduction , 1991 .

[71]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[72]  T. Trabasso,et al.  CONJUNCTIVE AND DISJUNCTIVE CONCEPT FORMATION UNDER EQUAL-INFORMATION CONDITIONS. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[73]  Joe Pater,et al.  L1 phonotactic knowledge and the L2 acquisition of alternations , 2006 .

[74]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[75]  Eugene Buckley,et al.  On the Learning of Arbitrary Phonological Rules , 2005 .

[76]  P. Boersma,et al.  Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[77]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[78]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[79]  D. Price-Williams,et al.  The Influence of Rule Structure and Problem Composition on Conceptual Learning Among Rural Hawaiian Children. Technical Report #75. , 1974 .

[80]  Hyunsoon Kim,et al.  A phonetically based account of phonological stop assibilation , 2001, Phonology.

[81]  G. Bower,et al.  Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning , 1988 .

[82]  Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars , 2007, Cognition.

[83]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  ATTRIBUTE- AND RULE-LEARNING ASPECTS OF CONCEPTUAL BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Psychological review.

[84]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[85]  L. Maloney,et al.  Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model , 2008, Vision Research.

[86]  Eric Baković Local assimilation and constraint interaction , 2007 .

[87]  R. L. Gottwald ATTRIBUTE-RESPONSE CORRELATIONS IN CONCEPT ATTAINMENT , 1971 .

[88]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Comparing modes of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[89]  W. L. King Learning and utilization of conjunctive and disjunctive classification rules: A developmental study☆☆☆ , 1966 .

[90]  C. F. Hockett The origin of speech. , 1960, Scientific American.

[91]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  The Need for Biases in Learning Generalizations , 2007 .

[92]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.

[93]  A. Endress,et al.  Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream , 2007, Cognition.

[94]  Matthew Goldrick,et al.  Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production , 2004 .

[95]  Larry M. Hyman,et al.  How autosegmental is phonology? , 2013 .

[96]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Verbal short-term memory reflects the sublexical organization of the phonological language network: Evidence from an incidental phonotactic learning paradigm , 2004 .

[97]  J. Ohala,et al.  Listeners’ Normalization of Vowel Quality Is Influenced by ‘Restored’ Consonantal Context , 1994 .

[98]  Attribute identification in children as a function of stimulus dimensionality , 1973 .

[99]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[100]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Conjunctive and disjunctive thinking in children , 1969 .

[101]  J. Saffran Statistical Language Learning , 2003 .

[102]  Jeff Mielke,et al.  The Emergence of Distinctive Features , 2008 .

[103]  Ferran Pons,et al.  Structural generalizations over consonants and vowels in 11-month-old infants , 2010, Cognition.

[104]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Pattern induction by infant language learners. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[105]  Jennifer Cole,et al.  On learnability and naturalness as constraints on phonological grammar , 2006, ExLing.

[106]  B. Love Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[107]  Frisch,et al.  Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon 16 , .

[108]  Colin Wilson,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Phonological Naturalness * , 2003 .

[109]  Elliott Moreton,et al.  UNDERPHONOLOGIZATION AND MODULARITY BIAS 1 , 2006 .

[110]  An analysis of the facilitative effect of similarity on second-order conditioning. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[111]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[112]  Perter Marler,et al.  The Instinct to Learn , 2008 .

[113]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Lessons from animal learning for the study of cognitive development , 1991 .

[114]  Herbert G. Tanner,et al.  Tier-based Strictly Local Constraints for Phonology , 2011, ACL.

[115]  W. C. Prentice,et al.  Paired association with related and unrelated pairs of nonsense-figures. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[116]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Selection strategies in conjunctive, disjunctive, and biconditional concept attainment. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[117]  Evaluating conditioning of related and unrelated stimuli using a compound test , 2008, Learning & behavior.

[118]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Maximum Entropy Models and Stochastic Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[119]  Keith Johnson,et al.  A Model of the Interplay of Speech Perception and Phonology , 2001 .

[120]  Gary S Dell,et al.  Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.