The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses

If approximately 80% of the public in the UK support wind energy, why is only a quarter of contracted wind power capacity actually commissioned? One common answer is that this is an example of the ‘not in my backyard’ (Nimby) syndrome: yes, wind power is a good idea as long as it is not in my backyard. However, the Nimby claim that there is an attitude–behaviour gap has been rightly criticised. This article distinguishes between two kinds of gap that might be confused, namely the ‘social gap’ – between the high public support for wind energy expressed in opinion surveys and the low success rate achieved in planning applications for wind power developments – and the ‘individual gap’, which exists when an individual person has a positive attitude to wind power in general but actively opposes a particular wind power development. Three different explanations of the social gap are distinguished, only one of which depends upon the individual gap. In the second section of the article the relevance of our three explanations for policy is considered. It is argued that the different explanations suggest different policy responses and that the success of efforts to increase wind energy capacity may depend on developing a better understanding of the relative significance of the three explanations.

[1]  A. Kolnai Rationalism in Politics , 1965, Philosophy.

[2]  Kenneth Mellanby Tilting at windmills , 1977, Nature.

[3]  Jane Mansbridge,et al.  Beyond self-interest , 1991 .

[4]  Jane J. Mansbridge Beyond self-interest , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[5]  P. Bosley,et al.  Risks and Benefits of Wind Generated Electricity: Facts and Perceptions , 1992 .

[6]  J. A. Halliday Wind energy-an option for the UK? , 1993 .

[7]  Stuart A. Wright,et al.  Citizen information levels and grassroots opposition to new hazardous waste sites: are nimbyists informed? , 1993 .

[8]  D. A. Elliott Public Reactions to Windfarms: The Dynamics of Opinion Formation , 1994 .

[9]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on Facility Siting , 1994 .

[10]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Renewable energy and the public , 1995 .

[11]  Merylyn McKenzie Hedger Wind power: challenges to planning policy in the UK , 1995 .

[12]  Susan Hunter,et al.  Beyond NIMBY. Explaining Opposition to Hazardous Waste Facilities , 1995 .

[13]  A. Irwin Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1995 .

[14]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Dutch wind power policy : Stagnating implementation of renewables , 1996 .

[15]  Patsy Healey,et al.  Consensus-building across Difficult Divisions: New approaches to collaborative strategy making , 1996 .

[16]  P. Healey Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[17]  A. E. Luloff,et al.  NIMBY and the hazardous and toxic waste siting dilemma: The need for concept clarification , 1998 .

[18]  M. Edelstein Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1998 .

[19]  Søren Krohn,et al.  On public attitudes towards wind power , 1999 .

[20]  David Elliott,et al.  A fresh start for UK wind power? , 2000 .

[21]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[22]  R. Kahn Siting Struggles: The Unique Challenge of Permitting Renewable Energy Power Plants , 2000 .

[23]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Wind Energy Landscapes: Society and Technology in the California Desert , 2001 .

[24]  Christine E. Dunn,et al.  Keeping the public informed? Public negotiation of air quality information , 2001 .

[25]  R. Suffling,et al.  Alternative dispute resolution and the protection of natural areas in Ontario, Canada , 2001 .

[26]  James Shanahan,et al.  The literature of environmental communication , 2002 .

[27]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources for Development , 2002 .

[28]  David Toke,et al.  Wind Power in UK and Denmark: Can Rational Choice Help Explain Different Outcomes? , 2002 .

[29]  Andrew R. Henderson,et al.  Offshore wind in Europe: The current state of the art , 2002 .

[30]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[31]  Andrew Dobson,et al.  Citizenship and the environment , 2003 .

[32]  Paul Helm,et al.  The Web of Belief , 2003 .

[33]  O. Bina,et al.  New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice, and Research , 2004 .

[34]  David Toke,et al.  Explaining wind power planning outcomes:: some findings from a study in England and Wales , 2005 .

[35]  George Marsh,et al.  Tilting at windmills , 2005 .