Significance of Rotating Ground Motions on Behavior of Symmetric- and Asymmetric-Plan Structures: Part I. Single-Story Structures

The California Building Code requires at least two ground motion components for the three-dimensional (3-D) response history analysis (RHA) of structures. For near-fault sites, these records should be rotated to fault-normal/fault-parallel (FN/FP) directions, and two RHA analyses should be performed separately. This approach is assumed to lead to two sets of responses that envelope the range of possible responses over all non-redundant rotation angles. This assumption is examined here using 3-D computer models of single-story structures having symmetric and asymmetric plans subjected to a suite of bidirectional earthquake ground motions. The influence that the rotation angle has on several engineering demand parameters is investigated in linear and nonlinear domains to evaluate the use of the FN/FP directions, and the maximum direction (MD). The statistical evaluation suggests that RHAs should be conducted by rotating a set of records to the MD and FN/FP directions, and taking the maximum response values from these analyses as design values.

[1]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of Buildings , 2006 .

[2]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Representation of Bidirectional Ground Motions for Design Spectra in Building Codes , 2011 .

[3]  Katsuichiro Goda,et al.  Comparison of Peak Ductility Demand of Inelastic SDOF Systems in Maximum Elastic Response and Major Principal Directions , 2012 .

[4]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF 3-DIMENSIONAL EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS , 1974 .

[5]  Erol Kalkan,et al.  Evaluation of fault-normal/fault-parallel directions rotated ground motions for response history analysis of an instrumented six-story building , 2012 .

[6]  Erol Kalkan,et al.  Significance of Rotating Ground Motions on Behavior of Symmetric- and Asymmetric-Plan Structures: Part II. Multi-Story Structures , 2015 .

[7]  S. Kunnath,et al.  Relevance of Absolute and Relative Energy Content in Seismic Evaluation of Structures , 2008 .

[8]  Erol Kalkan,et al.  Pros and Cons of Rotating Ground Motion Records to Fault-Normal/Parallel Directions for Response History Analysis of Buildings , 2014 .

[9]  Gregory A. MacRae,et al.  Three-Dimensional Steel Building Response to Near-Fault Motions , 2000 .

[10]  Ashraf Habibullah,et al.  A Clarification of the Orthogonal Effects in a Three-Dimensional Seismic Analysis , 1995 .

[11]  Oscar A López,et al.  The critical angle of seismic incidence and the maximum structural response , 1997 .

[12]  J. Bray,et al.  Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region , 2004 .

[13]  Asimina Athanatopoulou,et al.  Critical orientation of three correlated seismic components , 2005 .

[14]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis , 2007 .

[15]  Nikos D. Lagaros,et al.  Multicomponent incremental dynamic analysis considering variable incident angle , 2010 .

[16]  George P. Mavroeidis,et al.  A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions , 2003 .

[17]  Erol Kalkan,et al.  Update of the Graizer-Kalkan ground-motion prediction equations for shallow crustal continental earthquakes , 2015 .

[18]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Effective Cyclic Energy as a Measure of Seismic Demand , 2007 .

[19]  K. Campbell Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters , 2007 .

[20]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[21]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[22]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Modal Pushover-Based Scaling of Two Components of Ground Motion Records for Nonlinear RHA of Structures , 2012 .

[23]  Julio J. Hernández,et al.  Critical response of structures to multicomponent earthquake excitation , 2000 .

[24]  H. Hong,et al.  Characteristics of horizontal ground motion measures along principal directions , 2010 .

[25]  D. Boore,et al.  Beyond SaGMRotI: Conversion to SaArb, Sasn, and SaMaxRot , 2007 .

[26]  R. Riddell,et al.  Elastic and Inelastic Response Spectra Considering Near-Fault Effects , 2011 .

[27]  N. Luco,et al.  Maximum Spectral Demands in the Near-Fault Region , 2008 .

[28]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 1990 .

[29]  Erol Kalkan,et al.  Should ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal/parallel or maximum direction for response history analysis of buildings? , 2012 .

[30]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Response of buildings to near‐field pulse‐like ground motions , 1999 .

[31]  Ricardo A. Medina,et al.  Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions , 2007 .

[32]  Semih S. Tezcan,et al.  Parametric analysis of irregular structures under seismic loading according to the new Turkish Earthquake Code , 2001 .

[33]  Stavros A. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  An answer to an important controversy and the need for caution when using simple models to predict inelastic earthquake response of buildings with torsion , 2009 .

[34]  Ground Motion Attenuation during M 7.1 Darfield and M 6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquakes and Performance of Global Predictive Models , 2011 .

[35]  H Krawinkler,et al.  Shear in Beam-Column Joints in Seismic Design of Steel Frames , 1978, Engineering Journal.