Simulating Grice - Emergent Pragmatics in Spatialized Game Theory

How do conventions of communication emerge? How do sounds or gestures take on a semantic meaning, and how do pragmatic conventions emerge regarding the passing of adequate, reliable, and relevant information? My colleagues and I have attempted in earlier work to extend spatialized game theory to questions of semantics. Agent-based simulations indicate that simple signaling systems emerge fairly naturally on the basis of individual information maximization in environments of wandering food sources and predators. Simple signaling emerges by means of any of various forms of updating on the behavior of immediate neighbors: imitation, localized genetic algorithms, and partial training in neural nets. Here the goal is to apply similar techniques to questions of pragmatics. The motivating idea is the same: the idea that important aspects of pragmatics, like important aspects of semantics, may fall out as a natural results of information maximization in informational networks. The attempt below is to simulate fundamental elements of the Gricean picture: in particular, to show within networks of very simple agents the emergence of behavior in accord with the Gricean maxims. What these simulations suggest is that important features of pragmatics, like important aspects of semantics, don't have to be added in a theory of informational networks. They come for free. 1

[1]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  The evolution of syntactic communication , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Patrick Grim,et al.  Location, location, location: The importance of spatialization in modeling cooperation and communication , 2006 .

[3]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  The Emergence of a 'Language' in an Evolving Population of Neural Networks , 1998, Connect. Sci..

[4]  Prashant Parikh The use of language , 2001 .

[5]  M. Nowak,et al.  The evolutionary language game. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Patrick Grim,et al.  Learning to Communicate: The Emergence of Signaling in Spatialized Arrays of Neural Nets , 2002, Adapt. Behav..

[7]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.

[8]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Chapter 7: Game Dynamics Connects Semantics And Pragmatics , 2007 .

[9]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[10]  Laurene V. Fausett,et al.  Fundamentals Of Neural Networks , 1993 .

[11]  Patrick Grim,et al.  Evolution of communication with a spatialized genetic algorithm , 1999 .

[12]  P. Grim,et al.  Spatialization and greater generosity in the stochastic Prisoner's Dilemma. , 1996, Bio Systems.

[13]  Laurene V. Fausett,et al.  Fundamentals Of Neural Networks , 1994 .

[14]  B. MacLennan Synthetic Ethology An Approach to the Study of Communication , 2004 .

[15]  Michael Oliphant,et al.  Learning and the Emergence of Coordinated Communication , 1997 .

[16]  F. D. Saussure Cours de linguistique générale , 1924 .

[17]  G. Jäger,et al.  Game dynamics connects semantics and pragmatics , 2022 .

[18]  M. Nowak,et al.  Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations , 1992, Nature.

[19]  Patrick Grim,et al.  Evolution of communication in perfect and imperfect worlds , 2000 .

[20]  Prashant Parikh,et al.  Pragmatics and Games of Partial Information , 2006 .

[21]  P. Grim The greater generosity of the spatialized prisoner’s dilemma , 1995 .

[22]  A. Avramides Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[23]  M. Nowak,et al.  The evolution of stochastic strategies in the Prisoner's Dilemma , 1990 .

[24]  Robin Clark,et al.  Chapter 10: An Introduction To Equilibrium Semantics For Natural Language , 2007 .

[25]  Patrick Grim,et al.  Making meaning happen , 2004, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..