The reduction of abnormal behaviors in individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with a foraging/grooming board

A new environmental enrichment device, termed a “foraging/grooming board,” was presented to 8 individually housed rhesus monkeys for the explicit purpose of reducing the level of aberrant behaviors manifested by these animals. The device, consisting of a piece of plexiglass covered with artificial fleece, had particles of food treats rubbed into it and was attached to the outside of each animal's home cage. All animals foraged from the board to the point that a significant reduction in the level of abnormal behavior was noted. Most animals also groomed the fleece covering the board, utilizing the same motor patterns that would be directed toward grooming another monkey. These boards are inexpensive to construct and easy to sanitize, and do not require placing animal facility personnel at risk to maintain them.

[1]  M. Boccia.  Comparison of the physical characteristics of grooming in two species of macaques (Macaca nemestrina and M. radiata). , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[2]  S. Shelton,et al.  Defensive behaviors in infant rhesus monkeys: environmental cues and neurochemical regulation. , 1989, Science.

[3]  Martin Reite,et al.  On the physiology of grooming in a pigtail macaque , 1989, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  S. Iversen,et al.  Effects of Different Environmental Enrichment Devices on Cage Stereotypies and Autoaggression in Captive Cynomolgus Monkeys , 1988, Journal of medical primatology.

[5]  John H. Skillings,et al.  Nonparametric Stepwise Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1985 .

[6]  L. Rosenblum,et al.  Therapeutic effects of an imposed foraging task in disturbed monkeys. , 1984, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[7]  C. Goosen.  Abnormal behavior patterns in rhesus monkeys: symptoms of mental disease. , 1981, Biological psychiatry.

[8]  D. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods. , 1974 .

[9]  G. Berkson,et al.  Stereotyped movements of mental defectives. II. Effects of novel objects. , 1963, American journal of mental deficiency.

[10]  S. Altmann,et al.  A FIELD STUDY OF THE SOCIOBIOLOGY OF RHESUS MONKEYS, MACACA MULATTA * , 1962, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  H F HARLOW,et al.  Social deprivation in monkeys. , 1962, Scientific American.

[12]  A. R. Jonckheere,et al.  A TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE RELATION BETWEEN m RANKINGS AND k RANKED CATEGORIES , 1954 .

[13]  M. Bloomsmith,et al.  Food puzzle device simulating termite fishing for captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 1989 .

[14]  K. Strier.  Activity budgets of woolly spider monkeys, or muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides) , 1987, American journal of primatology.

[15]  P. Garber.  Foraging Strategies Among Living Primates , 1987 .

[16]  S. Eisele,et al.  Social enrichment of the environment with infants for singly caged adult rhesus monkeys , 1987 .

[17]  John F. Oates,et al.  Food distribution and foraging behavior , 1987 .

[18]  W. McGrew,et al.  An Artificial “gum‐tree” for marmosets (Callithrix j. jacchus) , 1986 .

[19]  T. Clutton‐Brock.  18 – Some Aspects of Intraspecific Variation in Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Primates , 1977 .

[20]  W. Mason.  Early Social Deprivation in the Nonhuman Primates: Implications for Human Behavior , 1968 .

[21]  G. Berkson.  Abnormal stereotyped motor acts. , 1967, Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Psychopathological Association.

[22]  W. Mason,et al.  STEREOTYPED MOVEMENTS OF MENTAL DEFECTIVES. IV. THE EFFECTS OF TOYS AND THE CHARACTER OF THE ACTS. , 1964, American journal of mental deficiency.