Wear characterization of the A-MAV™ anterior motion replacement using a spine wear simulator

Abstract Total disc replacement emerged as an alternative to fusion for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Optimization of the bearing surfaces is critical to mitigate wear-related biological reaction. The purpose of this study was to characterize the wear of the A-MAV™ metal-on-metal total disc replacement using a spine wear simulator, per the ASTM F2423-05 standard guide. Six specimens were tested under flexion-extension (FE) conditions for ten million cycles (MC), followed by lateral bending (LB) combined with axial rotation (AR) for an additional ten MC. A run-in wear period was observed during the first 0.5 MC for both testing conditions, followed by a steady-state wear rate of 0.33 ± 0.12 mm 3 /MC in FE and 0.43 ± 0.06 mm 3 /MC in combined motion. Phasing between LB and AR led to a crossing-path motion as observed on explanted devices. This study suggests that clinically-realistic surface morphology may be achieved by carefully selecting the wear test parameters specified in the ASTM standard guide. Furthermore, the use of metal-on-metal bearings in spinal arthroplasty may be viable in view of the low wear exhibited by this material combination.

[1]  C. Rieker,et al.  In vitro comparison of the two hard-hard articulations for total hip replacements , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  S. Jacobsen,et al.  Good performance of a titanium femoral component in cementless hip arthroplasty in younger patients97 arthroplasties followed for 5-11 years , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[3]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Surface Texture Analysis of Artificial Disks Wear-Tested under Different Conditions and Comparison to a Retrieved Implant , 2006 .

[5]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  F. Chan,et al.  5:52124. Retrieval analysis of short-term implanted Maverick total disc arthroplasty , 2005 .

[8]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Tribochemical reaction on metal-on-metal hip joint bearings A comparison between in-vitro and in-vivo results , 2003 .

[9]  N E Fowler,et al.  Changes in stature and spine kinematics during a loaded walking task. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[10]  P. Licina,et al.  OSTEOLYSIS AND COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ARTIFICIAL DISC REPLACEMENT , 2004 .

[11]  A. Edidin,et al.  Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[12]  A. Patla,et al.  Low back three-dimensional joint forces, kinematics, and kinetics during walking. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  R. Chiesa,et al.  In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  Humphreys Sc,et al.  Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. , 1999, American journal of orthopedics.

[16]  C. Bragdon,et al.  The Importance of Multidirectional Motion on the Wear of Polyethylene , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[17]  H. Tsuji,et al.  Motion characteristic of the normal lumbar spine in young adults: instantaneous axis of rotation and vertebral center motion analyses. , 1990, Journal of spinal disorders.

[18]  M. Wimmer,et al.  The acting wear mechanisms on metal-on-metal hip joint bearings: in-vitro results , 2001 .

[19]  Paul Park,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease after Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: Review of the Literature , 2004, Spine.

[20]  Thomas J Errico,et al.  Lumbar disc arthroplasty. , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  A. Gomoll,et al.  J‐integral fracture toughness and tearing modulus measurement of radiation cross‐linked UHMWPE , 2002, Journal of Orthopaedic Research.

[22]  J. Fisher,et al.  Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[23]  I C Clarke,et al.  Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  L. Claes,et al.  New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. , 1999, Spine.