Environmental DNA captured on the fish skin mucus – a potential bias to molecular diet analyses
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Szabóová | B. Števove | Daniel Gruľa | D. Arendt | Kristína Slovák Švolíková | Kristína Žitňanová
[1] I. Domaizon,et al. Fish eDNA metabarcoding from aquatic biofilm samples: Methodological aspects , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.
[2] Arne J. Beermann,et al. Improved freshwater macroinvertebrate detection from environmental DNA through minimized nontarget amplification , 2020, ARPHA Conference Abstracts.
[3] S. Hadi,et al. Profiling and Role of Bioactive Molecules from Puntius sophore (Freshwater/Brackish Fish) Skin Mucus with Its Potent Antibacterial, Antiadhesion, and Antibiofilm Activities , 2020, Biomolecules.
[4] I. Pyrri,et al. Fungal contaminants of indoor air in the National Library of Greece , 2020, Aerobiologia.
[5] L. Kago,et al. Assessment of Fungal Contamination in Fish Feed from the Lake Victoria Basin, Uganda , 2020, Toxins.
[6] A. Bhatnagar,et al. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of skin mucus of three carp species , 2019, International Aquatic Research.
[7] Rui Zhang,et al. Analysis of enzyme activity, antibacterial activity, antiparasitic activity and physico‐chemical stability of skin mucus derived from Amphiprion clarkii , 2019, Fish & shellfish immunology.
[8] M. A. Senar,et al. The choice of universal primers and the characteristics of the species mixture determine when DNA metabarcoding can be quantitative , 2018, Molecular ecology.
[9] Kristian Meissner,et al. Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive. , 2018, Water research.
[10] Sudhir Kumar,et al. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. , 2018, Molecular biology and evolution.
[11] F. Altermatt,et al. Shedding light on eDNA: neither natural levels of UV radiation nor the presence of a filter feeder affect eDNA-based detection of aquatic organisms , 2018, PloS one.
[12] M. Traugott,et al. Identifying plant DNA in the sponging–feeding insect pest Drosophila suzukii , 2018, Journal of Pest Science.
[13] N. Gunde-Cimerman,et al. Fungal Contaminants in Drinking Water Regulation? A Tale of Ecology, Exposure, Purification and Clinical Relevance , 2017, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
[14] F. Leese,et al. Validation and Development of COI Metabarcoding Primers for Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment , 2017, Front. Environ. Sci..
[15] Carol A. Stepien,et al. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding assays to detect invasive invertebrate species in the Great Lakes , 2017, PloS one.
[16] A. Iribar,et al. Application of DNA metabarcoding on faeces to identify European catfish Silurus glanis diet. , 2017, Journal of fish biology.
[17] M. Traugott,et al. Comparing three types of dietary samples for prey DNA decay in an insect generalist predator , 2017, bioRxiv.
[18] F. Leese,et al. Widely distributed and regionally isolated! Drivers of genetic structure in Gammarus fossarum in a human-impacted landscape , 2016, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[19] Matthew A. Barnes,et al. The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics , 2016, Conservation Genetics.
[20] G. Joo,et al. Discovering hidden biodiversity: the use of complementary monitoring of fish diet based on DNA barcoding in freshwater ecosystems , 2015, Ecology and evolution.
[21] Bettina Thalinger,et al. Maximizing dietary information retrievable from carcasses of Great Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo using a combined morphological and molecular analytical approach , 2015, The Ibis.
[22] J. Piñol,et al. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high‐throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[23] Bettina Thalinger,et al. Molecular prey identification in Central European piscivores , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[24] Robert S. Arkle,et al. Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream‐dwelling amphibian , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.
[25] U. Jondelius,et al. Problematic barcoding in flatworms: A case-study on monogeneans and rhabdocoels (Platyhelminthes) , 2013, ZooKeys.
[26] Kwang-Seuk Jeong,et al. Application of DNA barcoding for identification of freshwater carnivorous fish diets: Is number of prey items dependent on size class for Micropterus salmoides? , 2013, Ecology and evolution.
[27] J. Geller,et al. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all‐taxa biotic surveys , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.
[28] B. Deagle,et al. Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA‐based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: which counts count? , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.
[29] Cheng-Hong Yang,et al. Specific primer design for the polymerase chain reaction , 2013, Biotechnology Letters.
[30] V. Ranwez,et al. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.
[31] M. Payton,et al. Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut‐content analysis , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.
[32] M. Traugott,et al. Optimizing methods for PCR-based analysis of predation , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.
[33] S. Ludsin,et al. Utilization of stomach content DNA to determine diet diversity in piscivorous fishes. , 2011, Journal of fish biology.
[34] Jean-François Martin,et al. A PCR‐based method for diet analysis in freshwater organisms using 18S rDNA barcoding on faeces , 2010, Molecular Ecology Resources.
[35] Wijnand Eduard,et al. Fungal spores: A critical review of the toxicological and epidemiological evidence as a basis for occupational exposure limit setting , 2009, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[36] D. Marcogliese,et al. Development of primers for the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene in digenetic trematodes (Platyhelminthes) illustrates the challenge of barcoding parasitic helminths , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.
[37] V. Allain,et al. DNA identification of gut contents of large pelagic fishes , 2005 .
[38] Jain-Shing Wu,et al. Primer design using genetic algorithm , 2004, Bioinform..
[39] J. Bøgwald,et al. Influence of artificial wound and non-intact mucus layer on mortality of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salarL.) following a bath challenge withVibrio anguillarumandAeromonas salmonicida , 1997 .
[40] P. Sunnucks,et al. Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.
[41] C. Goldberg,et al. Special Issue Article: Environmental DNA Quantifying effects of UV-B, temperature, and pH on eDNA degradation in aquatic microcosms , 2014 .
[42] J. B. Alexander,et al. Noncellular nonspecific defence mechanisms of fish , 1992 .