Ex Ante Scale Dynamics Analysis in the Policy Debate on Sustainable Biofuels in Mozambique

In this paper, we explore how ex ante scale dynamics analysis can contribute to better understanding of interactions between scales and levels, and how these interactions influence solution space in policy processes. In so doing, we address opportunities and challenges of conducting ex ante scale dynamics analysis as part of an action-oriented social science research approach that seeks to enhance its contribution to more scale-sensitive policy development. The policy debate on sustainable biofuels in Mozambique provides the empirical context in which we analyze interactions across administrative, institutional, and economic scales and levels, and how these interactions influence the space in which policy solutions can be explored and designed. On the basis of the analysis, we conclude that ex ante scale dynamics analysis can contribute to: (1) increasing awareness of interactions between scales and levels, and their implications for policy, (2) identifying immediate and potential matches and mismatches between scales and levels, and developing (adaptive) capacity to address them, and (3) identifying stakeholders and their scale- and level-related interests that can provide the basis for collaborative multi-stakeholder learning. Consequently, ex ante scale dynamics analysis can provide an important contribution to balancing and harmonizing interactions across different scales and levels, from which innovative and scale-sensitive policy responses can emerge. As part of an action-oriented, social science research approach, careful attention needs to be paid to processes of scale and level inclusion and exclusion when conducting scale dynamics analysis.

[1]  G. Cumming,et al.  Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions , 2006 .

[2]  Martha M. Bakker,et al.  The role of governance in agricultural expansion and intensification: a global study of arable agriculture , 2011 .

[3]  A. van der Veen,et al.  Effect of Policy Interventions on Food Security in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia , 2011 .

[4]  E. Turnhout,et al.  Databases, scaling practices, and the globalization of biodiversity , 2011 .

[5]  C. Termeer,et al.  Do Scale Frames Matter? Scale Frame Mismatches in the Decision Making Process of a “Mega Farm” in a Small Dutch Village , 2011 .

[6]  Peter Frost,et al.  Competing Claims on Natural Resources: What Role for Science? , 2008 .

[7]  Robert Hoppe,et al.  Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements , 2005, Poiesis Prax..

[8]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World , 2006 .

[9]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification , 2007 .

[10]  C. Termeer,et al.  Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance , 2010 .

[11]  Marc Schut,et al.  Beyond the research-policy interface. Boundary arrangements at research-stakeholder interfaces in the policy debate on biofuel sustainability in Mozambique , 2013 .

[12]  Tom Veldkamp,et al.  From Scaling to Governance of the Land System: Bridging Ecological and Economic Perspectives , 2011 .

[13]  Marc Schut,et al.  Space for innovation for sustainable community-based biofuel production and use: Lessons learned for policy from Nhambita community, Mozambique , 2011 .

[14]  M. Schut,et al.  Biofuel developments in Mozambique. Update and analysis of policy, potential and reality , 2010 .

[15]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey , 2000, Ecological Economics.

[16]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[17]  Marc Schut,et al.  Knowledge and innovation management in the policy debate on biofuel sustainability in Mozambique: what roles for researchers? , 2011 .

[18]  David W. Cash,et al.  Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes , 2000 .

[19]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol - an assessment of the possibilities of certified production , 2007 .

[20]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Scale and Governance: Conceptual Considerations and Practical Implications , 2011 .