Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations

For many species, not all required resources are contained in breeding habitat. Such species depend on landscape complementation, i.e., linking together different land- scape elements through movement, to complete their life cycles. We suggest that the di- chotomous habitat classification of many metapopulation analyses (habitat vs. nonhabitat) masks our ability to detect metapopulation effects for such species. We tested this using a species for which landscape complementation is obligate and metapopulation structure is likely: Rana pipiens, the northern leopard frog. We used breeding chorus survey data to index relative abundance of leopard frogs in 34 "core" ponds and conducted Poisson regression analysis to determine the effects on frog density of local pond habitat, availability of summer habitat (landscape complementation), and number of occupied ponds in the surrounding landscapes (metapopulation structure). All of these factors had statistically significant effects on frog density. However, when summer habitat was not included in the statistical model, the metapopulation structure was no longer significant; i.e., its effect was masked. Our results suggest that one must be cautious in applying the results of metapo- pulation analyses to species for which the habitat vs. nonhabitat categorization of'the landscape is not appropriate. The potential for rescue and recolonization to maintain a regional population must be assessed within the constraints of the entire landscape.

[1]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Ecological Processes That Affect Populations in Complex Landscapes , 1992 .

[2]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Effect of road traffic on amphibian density , 1995 .

[3]  G. Fellers,et al.  Disappearance of the cascades frog Rana cascadae at the southern end of its range, California, USA , 1993 .

[4]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Habitat Patch Connectivity and Population Survival , 1985 .

[5]  S. Harrison,et al.  Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation , 1991 .

[6]  K. Gosner,et al.  The Effects of Acidity on the Development and Hatching of New Jersey Frogs , 1957 .

[7]  Joel C. Trexler,et al.  Nontraditional Regression Analyses , 1993 .

[8]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[9]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Anthropogenic Correlates of Species Richness in Southeastern Ontario Wetlands , 1997 .

[10]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .

[11]  A. Pace.  Systematic and biological studies of the leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex) of the United States. , 1974 .

[12]  H. Wilbur.  Complex Life Cycles , 1980 .

[13]  R. Szaro,et al.  Management of amphibians, reptiles, and small mammals in North America: Proceedings of the symposium , 1988 .

[14]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[15]  A. Seitz,et al.  The influence of land use on the genetic structure of populations of the common frog Rana temporaria , 1990 .

[16]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Landscape pattern and population conservation , 1995 .

[17]  David K. Skelly,et al.  Pond Drying, Predators, and the Distribution of Pseudacris Tadpoles , 1996 .

[18]  C. Vos,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis , 1998 .

[19]  C. Wiklund,et al.  Host plants, nectar source plants, and habitat selection of males and females of Anthocharis cardamines (Lepidoptera) , 1978 .

[20]  D. McCullough,et al.  Spatially structured populations and harvest theory , 1996 .

[21]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Effect of Spatial Arrangement of Habitat Patches on Local Population Size , 1988 .

[22]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  K. Buhlmann.  HABITAT USE, TERRESTRIAL MOVEMENTS, AND CONSERVATION OF THE TURTLE, DEIROCHELYS RETICULARIA IN VIRGINIA , 1995 .

[24]  C. Wiklund.  Oviposition, feeding and spatial separation of breeding and foraging habitats in a population of Leptidea sinapis (Lepidoptera) , 1977 .

[25]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[26]  M. Gilbert.  Reproduction of the Northern Leopard Frog (Rana pipiens) in Floodplain Habitat in the Richelieu River, P. Quebec, Canada , 1994 .

[27]  W. Heyer,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. , 1995 .

[28]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[29]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[30]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Conservation Lessons from Long-Term Studies of Checkerspot Butterflies , 1987 .

[31]  J. Dole.  Dispersal of Recently Metamorphosed Leopard Frogs, Rana pipiens , 1971 .

[32]  D. Wake,et al.  Amphibian Declines: Judging Stability, Persistence, and Susceptibility of Populations to Local and Global Extinctions , 1994 .

[33]  G. Merriam,et al.  Distribution of Woodland Species in Farmland Woods , 1983 .

[34]  John B. Dunning,et al.  Patch Isolation, Corridor Effects, and Colonization by a Resident Sparrow in a Managed Pine Woodland , 1995 .

[35]  D. Bradford,et al.  Isolation of Remaining Populations of the Native Frog, Rana muscosa, by Introduced Fishes in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, California , 1993 .

[36]  J. Gibbons,et al.  Terrestrial Buffer Zones and Wetland Conservation: A Case Study of Freshwater Turtles in a Carolina Bay , 1995 .

[37]  P. Sjögren.  Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae) , 1991 .

[38]  J. Dole.  Summer Movements of Adult Leopard Frogs, Rana Pipiens Schreber, in Northern Michigan , 1965 .

[39]  D. H. Bennett,et al.  Terrestrial Activity in Aquatic Turtles , 1970 .

[40]  K. Berven,et al.  Factors Affecting Population Fluctuations in Larval and Adult Stages of the Wood Frog (Rana Sylvatica) , 1990 .

[41]  Per Sjogren Gulve.  Distribution and Extinction Patterns within a Northern Metapopulation of the Pool Frog, Rana Lessonae , 1994 .

[42]  T. Beebee,et al.  Discriminant analysis of amphibian habitat determinants in South-East England , 1985 .

[43]  B. Freedman,et al.  Acidity and associated water chemistry of amphibian habitats in Nova Scotia , 1985 .

[44]  L. Hansson.  On the Importance of Landscape Heterogeneity in Northern Regions for the Breeding Population Densities of Homeotherms: A General Hypothesis , 1979 .

[45]  D. Wake,et al.  Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon? , 1990 .

[46]  D. Green.  PERSPECTIVES ON AMPHIBIAN POPULATION DECLINES: DEFINING THE PROBLEM AND SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS. , 1997 .

[47]  Albert Hazen Wright,et al.  Handbook of Frogs and Toads ... of the United States and Canada , 1949 .

[48]  W. Dunson,et al.  Field and Laboratory Studies of Ion Balance and Growth Rates of Ranid Tadpoles Chronically Exposed to Low pH , 1985 .

[49]  D. E. Gill.  The Metapopulation Ecology of the Red‐Spotted Newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque) , 1978 .

[50]  J. Halley,et al.  Predicting the Persistence of Amphibian Populations with the Help of a Spatial Model , 1996 .

[51]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Landscape mosaics and ecological theory , 1995 .

[52]  G. Merriam,et al.  Patchy environments and species survival: Chipmunks in an agricultural mosaic , 1985 .

[53]  A. O. Nicholls.  How to make biological surveys go further with generalised linear models , 1989 .

[54]  Roland H. Lamberson,et al.  Reserve Design for Territorial Species: The Effects of Patch Size and Spacing on the Viability of the Northern Spotted Owl* , 1994 .

[55]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied linear statistical models : regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs , 1974 .