Identification of key clinical phenotypes of breast cancer using a reduced panel of protein biomarkers

Background:Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease characterised by complex molecular alterations underlying the varied behaviour and response to therapy. However, translation of cancer genetic profiling for use in routine clinical practice remains elusive or prohibitively expensive. As an alternative, immunohistochemical analysis applied to routinely processed tissue samples could be used to identify distinct biological classes of breast cancer.Methods:In this study, 1073 archival breast tumours previously assessed for 25 key breast cancer biomarkers using immunohistochemistry and classified using clustering algorithms were further refined using naïve Bayes classification performance. Criteria for class membership were defined using the expression of a reduced panel of 10 proteins able to identify key molecular classes. We examined the association between these breast cancer classes with clinicopathological factors and patient outcome.Results:We confirm patient classification similar to established genotypic biological classes of breast cancer in addition to novel sub-divisions of luminal and basal tumours. Correlations between classes and clinicopathological parameters were in line with expectations and showed highly significant association with patient outcome. Furthermore, our novel biological class stratification provides additional prognostic information to the Nottingham Prognostic Index.Conclusion:This study confirms that distinct molecular phenotypes of breast cancer can be identified using robust and routinely available techniques and both the luminal and basal breast cancer phenotypes are heterogeneous and contain distinct subgroups.

[1]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Jacques Ferlay,et al.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000 , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[3]  G. Ball,et al.  High‐throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well‐characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[4]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Michael Friendly,et al.  Visualizing Categorical Data , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[6]  L. Ein-Dor,et al.  Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[8]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[9]  Elia Biganzoli,et al.  Molecular Subtyping of Breast Cancer from Traditional Tumor Marker Profiles Using Parallel Clustering Methods , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  Samuel Leung,et al.  Basal-Like Breast Cancer Defined by Five Biomarkers Has Superior Prognostic Value than Triple-Negative Phenotype , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  Farin Kamangar,et al.  Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  Subtyping of Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry to Investigate a Relationship between Subtype and Short and Long Term Survival: A Collaborative Analysis of Data for 10,159 Cases from 12 Studies , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[13]  Elia Biganzoli,et al.  p53 status identifies two subgroups of triple-negative breast cancers with distinct biological features. , 2011, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[14]  J. Bergh,et al.  Basoluminal Carcinoma: A New Biologically and Prognostically Distinct Entity Between Basal and Luminal Breast Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  T. Sørlie,et al.  Distinct molecular mechanisms underlying clinically relevant subtypes of breast cancer: gene expression analyses across three different platforms , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[16]  Michael R. Anderberg,et al.  Cluster Analysis for Applications , 1973 .

[17]  I. Ellis,et al.  Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  Yudi Pawitan,et al.  Intrinsic molecular signature of breast cancer in a population-based cohort of 412 patients , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[19]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[20]  A. Salomon,et al.  p53 mutation as a genetic trait of typical medullary breast carcinoma. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  R. Spang,et al.  Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  A methodology to identify consensus classes from clustering algorithms applied to immunohistochemical data from breast cancer patients , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[23]  Philip M. Long,et al.  Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Jonathan M. Garibaldi,et al.  A quantifier-based fuzzy classification system for breast cancer patients , 2013, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[25]  Lajos Pusztai,et al.  Molecular classification of breast cancer: limitations and potential. , 2006, The oncologist.

[26]  Jonathan M. Garibaldi,et al.  A Comparison of Three Different Methods for Classification of Breast Cancer Data , 2008, 2008 Seventh International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications.

[27]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Khairul A. Rasmani,et al.  Linguistic rulesets extracted from a quantifier-based fuzzy classification system , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[29]  I. Ellis,et al.  A critical appraisal of existing classification systems of epithelial hyperplasia and in situ neoplasia of the breast with proposals for future methods of categorization: where are we going? , 1999, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[30]  J. R. Reeves,et al.  Expression of the HER1–4 family of receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer , 2003, The Journal of pathology.

[31]  A. Gown,et al.  Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[32]  I. Ellis,et al.  Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens , 2010, Histopathology.

[33]  I. Ellis,et al.  The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[34]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  C. Perou,et al.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. , 2006, JAMA.

[36]  D. Goodin The cambridge dictionary of statistics , 1999 .

[37]  A. Nobel,et al.  The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[38]  R. Simon Validation of pharmacogenomic biomarker classifiers for treatment selection. , 2006, Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers.

[39]  Stuart A. Roberts,et al.  New methods for the initialisation of clusters , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..