Improvement of Asphalt-Aggregate Adhesion Using Plant Ash Byproduct

The adhesion bonding between asphalt and aggregate significantly influences field performance and durability of asphalt pavement. Adhesion promoters are typically used to improve asphalt-aggregate bonding and minimize moisture-related pavement damage, such as cracking and raveling. This study evaluated the effectiveness of plant ash byproduct as adhesion promoter to improve asphalt-aggregate adhesion performance. Three commonly used aggregate types (granite, basic rock, and limestone) and two asphalt binder types were used in laboratory testing. A modified stripping test method was developed to evaluate test results with image analysis and measurement of asphalt film thickness. The contact angle test and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS) were conducted. Test results showed that plant ash lixivium significantly improved asphalt-aggregate adhesion. Among three aggregate types, granite yielded the worst asphalt-aggregate adhesion for both control and treated specimens. The effectiveness of adhesion promotion varied depending on the type of asphalt or aggregate and temperature. The SEM/EDS observations showed that the mesh-like crystalline was formed at the interface between asphalt binder and aggregate in the treated specimen, which was believed to enhance the interfacial bonding and prevent asphalt film peeling off from aggregate.

[1]  Xingyi Zhu,et al.  Identification of interfacial transition zone in asphalt concrete based on nano-scale metrology techniques , 2017 .

[2]  Dallas N. Little,et al.  Surface Free Energy to Identify Moisture Sensitivity of Materials for Asphalt Mixes , 2007 .

[3]  Xiaolong Zou,et al.  Study on the optimum rice husk ash content added in asphalt binder and its modification with bio-oil , 2017 .

[4]  A. Drews Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials , 1998 .

[5]  M. C. Rubio,et al.  Effect of aggregate nature on the fatigue-cracking behavior of asphalt mixes , 2013 .

[6]  Seyed Amid Tahami,et al.  Assessment of mechanical properties of rice husk ash modified asphalt mixture , 2017 .

[7]  Fuchen Wang,et al.  The physicochemical properties of different biomass ashes at different ashing temperature. , 2011 .

[8]  Kaili Xu,et al.  The Influence of Ashing Temperature on Ash Fouling and Slagging Characteristics during Combustion of Biomass Fuels , 2017 .

[9]  Seong-Wan Park,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Anti-stripping Additives in Bituminous Mixtures through Multiple Scale Laboratory Test Results , 2012 .

[10]  B. Jenkins,et al.  High temperature elemental losses and mineralogical changes in common biomass ashes , 2006 .

[11]  Yudong Huang,et al.  Studies on surface energy of asphalt and aggregate at different scales and bonding property of asphalt–aggregate system , 2018 .

[12]  Enqiang Lin,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of asphalt-aggregate interface adhesion strength with moisture effect , 2017 .

[13]  Nur Izzi Md. Yusoff,et al.  The effects of moisture susceptibility and ageing conditions on nano-silica/polymer-modified asphalt mixtures , 2014 .

[14]  D. Lesueur,et al.  The mechanisms of hydrated lime modification of asphalt mixtures: a state-of-the-art review , 2013 .

[15]  Shaopeng Wu,et al.  Investigation into material optimization and development for improved ravelling resistant porous asphalt concrete , 2010 .

[16]  D. Thompson,et al.  Post-harvest processing methods for reduction of silica and alkali metals in wheat straw , 2003 .

[17]  Burak Sengoz,et al.  Predicting stripping and moisture induced damage of asphalt concrete prepared with polymer modified bitumen and hydrated lime , 2009 .

[18]  Mahyar Arabani,et al.  Estimating Moisture Sensitivity of Warm Mix Asphalt Modified with Zycosoil as an Antistrip Agent Using Surface Free Energy Method , 2012 .

[19]  Valeria Vignali,et al.  Use of image analysis for the evaluation of rolling bottle tests results , 2017 .

[20]  Meng Guo,et al.  Multiscale test research on interfacial adhesion property of cold mix asphalt , 2014 .

[21]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Adhesive and Cohesive Properties of Asphalt-Aggregate Systems Subjected to Moisture Damage , 2010 .

[22]  Mahyar Arabani,et al.  Using the Surface Free Energy Method to Evaluate the Effects of Polymeric Aggregate Treatment on Moisture Damage in Hot-Mix Asphalt , 2011 .

[23]  F. Nejad,et al.  Investigating the properties of crumb rubber modified bitumen using classic and SHRP testing methods , 2012 .

[24]  Bagdat Teltayev,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of organosilane-based adhesion promoter effect on bitumen-aggregate bond by contact angle test , 2017 .

[25]  Hao Wang,et al.  Evaluation of permanent deformation of asphalt mixtures using different laboratory performance tests , 2014 .

[26]  K. Lee,et al.  Improving moisture sensitivity and mechanical properties of sulfur extended asphalt mixture by nano-antistripping agent , 2017 .

[27]  F. Grau,et al.  Engineering Behavior and Characteristics of Wood Ash and Sugarcane Bagasse Ash , 2015, Materials.

[28]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Measuring the Effect of Moisture on Asphalt–Aggregate Bond with the Bitumen Bond Strength Test , 2011 .

[29]  Guangji Xu,et al.  Molecular dynamics study of interfacial mechanical behavior between asphalt binder and mineral aggregate , 2016 .

[30]  Mohammad Javad Azarhoosh,et al.  Influence of using nonmaterial to reduce the moisture susceptibility of hot mix asphalt , 2012 .

[31]  Hao Wang,et al.  Study of cohesion and adhesion properties of asphalt concrete with molecular dynamics simulation , 2016 .