Imitating the effect of amblyopia on VEP-based acuity estimates

PurposeAcuity testing based on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) overestimates acuity in patients with amblyopia. We hypothesized that distortion and fragmentation of the stimulus in amblyopia impede recognition of optotypes, while it leaves the pattern onset response in the VEP mostly unaffected, resulting in overestimation of acuity.MethodsAcuity VEPs were recorded in visually normal participants with the stimulus degraded by patterned polymethyl methacrylate panes, which induce distortion and fragmentation. For comparison, frosted panes were used to induce blur through wide-angle scattering. Standard psychophysical optotype acuity was recorded under the same conditions.ResultsWith the distorted and fragmented stimuli, the VEP consistently overestimated acuity relative to psychophysical optotype acuity. With blurred stimuli, both measures were in good agreement.ConclusionsThe data support the assumption that stimulus distortion and fragmentation leave VEP-based measures of acuity relatively unaffected, resulting in a discrepancy between measures of acuity that are based on checkerboard VEPs on one hand and psychophysical optotype recognition on the other hand. The technique of stimulus degradation described here provides a simple and efficient way of imitating effects that are known from amblyopia and may thus serve as a tool in the evaluation of vision tests.

[1]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Objective determination of human visual acuity: pattern evoked potentials. , 1977, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Sven P. Heinrich,et al.  Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[3]  Gordon N Dutton,et al.  Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Graham E. Holder,et al.  Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[5]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Nonveridical visual perception in human amblyopia. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Pattern electroretinogram plus visual evoked potential: A decisive test in patients suspected of malingering , 1987, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[7]  C. Teping [Determination of visual acuity by the visually evoked cortical potential (author's transl)]. , 1981, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[8]  F. Campbell,et al.  On the nature of the neural abnormality in human amblyopia; neural aberrations and neural sensitivity loss , 1978, Pflügers Archiv.

[9]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials in Malingering , 2001, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[10]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  Distortions in two-dimensional visual space perception in strabismic observers , 1993, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  Susan J Leat,et al.  The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP , 2008, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  E. Marg,et al.  Effect of natural deprivation and unilateral eye patching on visual acuity of infants and children. Evoked potential measurements. , 1981, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[14]  E. Colon Evoked Potential Manual: A Practical Guide to Clinical Applications , 1990 .

[15]  A Bradley,et al.  New methods for discriminating neural and optical losses of vision. , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  B. Kushner,et al.  Grating visual acuity with Teller cards compared with Snellen visual acuity in literate patients. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  M Bach,et al.  Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[18]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Electrodiagnosis by luminance and pattern stimulation , 1990 .

[19]  R. Dawson How Significant is a Boxplot Outlier? , 2011 .

[20]  M. Bach,et al.  Event-Related Potentials Allow for Optotype-Based Objective Acuity Estimation. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Yaroslava WennerSven Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia , 2014 .