Mutual engagement and collocation with shared representations

In this paper we explore the use of shared representations to support creative activities, focussing on collaborative music making. We examine the effect that user interface features of shared representations have on mutual engagement and show that providing shared awareness mechanisms increases mutual engagement. In particular, we show through an empirical study of 78 participants that providing cues to identity and shared pointers increases mutual engagement between participants, but together these features can overwhelm users. We also demonstrate that support for free-form annotation and spatial interaction with shared representations mediates interaction and helps participants to manage their collaborative activity effectively. In this paper we develop several measures mutual engagement and demonstrate their use to assess the design of shared representations. A key contribution of this paper is the development of a measure of collocation of participant interaction which indicates mutual engagement. The findings of the study have implications beyond the domain of collaborative music making and we outline some design guidelines for mutually engaging shared representations.

[1]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The effects of co-present embodiments on awareness and collaboration in tabletop groupware , 2008, Graphics Interface.

[2]  Sunil K. Sarin,et al.  Experiences with workflow management: issues for the next generation , 1994, CSCW '94.

[3]  Steven Brown,et al.  The Origins of Music: Edited by Nils L. Wallin, Björn Merker, and Steven Brown, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000, xii+ 498 pages, ISBN 0-262-23206-5, US$60.00 , 2000 .

[4]  W. Freeman,et al.  A neurobiological role of music in social bonding , 2000 .

[5]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration , 2003 .

[6]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: ClearBoard design and experiments , 1993, TOIS.

[7]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings , 1988, CSCW '88.

[8]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[9]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  WYSIWIS revised: early experiences with multiuser interfaces , 1987, TOIS.

[10]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence , 2002, CSCW '02.

[11]  Allison Druin,et al.  Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration , 1999, CHI '99.

[12]  Marcelo Soares Pimenta,et al.  CODES: supporting awareness in a web-based environment for collective music prototyping , 2006, IHC '06.

[13]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces , 2004, CSCW.

[14]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[15]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor , 1993, TOIS.

[16]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[17]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[18]  lvaro Barbosa,et al.  Displaced Soundscapes: A Survey of Network Systems for Music and Sonic Art Creation , 2003, Leonardo Music Journal.

[19]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .

[20]  Nick Bryan-Kinns Daisyphone: the design and impact of a novel environment for remote group music improvisation , 2004, DIS '04.

[21]  Robert DeLine,et al.  Let's go to the whiteboard: how and why software developers use drawings , 2007, CHI.

[22]  A. A. Sawchuk,et al.  From remote media immersion to Distributed Immersive Performance , 2003, ETP '03.

[23]  A. D. Ritchie The Creative Mind , 1946, Nature.

[24]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Enabling interaction with single user applications through speech and gestures on a multi-user tabletop , 2006, AVI '06.

[25]  Nick Bryan-Kinns,et al.  Inter-Play : Understanding Group Music Improvisation as a Form of Everyday Interaction , 2005 .

[26]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration , 2003, TCHI.

[27]  Christopher Dobrian,et al.  The 'E' in NIME: Musical Expression with New Computer Interfaces , 2006, NIME.

[28]  Steve Benford,et al.  A poetry performance in a collaborative virtual environment , 2000 .

[29]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  New interfaces for musical expression , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  F. Fischer,et al.  Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools , 2002 .

[31]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Constructing Common Information Spaces , 1997, ECSCW.

[32]  Jennifer G. Sheridan,et al.  Designing for performative tangible interaction , 2008, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[33]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Avoiding interference: how people use spatial separation and partitioning in SDG workspaces , 2004, CSCW.

[34]  Nick Bryan-Kinns,et al.  Analysing Group Creativity: A Distributed Cognitive Study of Joint Music Composition , 2006 .

[35]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Deictic Roles of External Representations in Face-to-Face and Online Collaboration , 2003, CSCL.

[36]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Roles of Orientation in Tabletop Collaboration: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[37]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning , 1986, CSCW '86.

[38]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[39]  L. Mamykina,et al.  Collaborative creativity , 2002, CACM.

[40]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Evaluating the effects of frame of reference on spatial collaboration using desktop collaborative virtual environments , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[41]  E. Edmonds,et al.  The Creative Process Where the Artist is Amplified or Superseded by the Computer , 1973 .

[42]  Dan Stowell,et al.  Evaluation of live human-computer music-making: Quantitative and qualitative approaches , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  Nick Bryan-Kinns,et al.  Identifying mutual engagement , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[44]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  System Guidelines for Co-located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display , 2003, ECSCW.

[45]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation , 2007, CACM.

[46]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems , 1983, TOIS.

[47]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Integration of Inter-Personal Space and Shared Workspace: ClearBoard Design and Experiments , 1992, CSCW.

[49]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis , 1997 .

[50]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Emergent global cueing of local activity: covering in music , 1997, CSCL.