Differentiating the Lévy walk from a composite correlated random walk

Summary Understanding how to find targets with very limited information is a topic of interest in many disciplines. In ecology, such research has often focused on the development of two movement models: (i) the Levy walk and (ii) the composite correlated random walk and its associated area-restricted search behaviour. Although the processes underlying these models differ, they can produce similar movement patterns. Due to this similarity and because of their disparate formulation, current methods cannot reliably differentiate between these two models. Here, we present a method that differentiates between the two models. It consists of likelihood functions, including one for a hidden Markov model, and associated statistical measures that assess the relative support for and absolute fit of each model. Using a simulation study, we show that our method can differentiate between the two search models over a range of parameter values. Using the movement data of two polar bears (Ursus maritimus), we show that the method can be applied to complex, real-world movement paths. By providing the means to differentiate between the two most prominent search models in the literature, and a framework that could be extended to include other models, we facilitate further research into the strategies animals use to find resources.

[1]  Olga Pavlova,et al.  Female polar bears, Ursus maritimus, on the Barents Sea drift ice: walking the treadmill , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[3]  A M Reynolds,et al.  Distinguishing between Lévy walks and strong alternative models. , 2012, Ecology.

[4]  Dirk Eddelbuettel,et al.  Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ Integration , 2011 .

[5]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[6]  Michael J Plank,et al.  Sampling rate and misidentification of Lévy and non-Lévy movement paths. , 2009, Ecology.

[7]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches , 2008 .

[8]  G. Pyke Understanding movements of organisms: it's time to abandon the Lévy foraging hypothesis , 2015 .

[9]  S. Amstrup,et al.  Movements and distribution of polar bears in the Beaufort Sea , 2000 .

[10]  Avner Bar-Hen,et al.  Comparative analysis of methods for inferring successful foraging areas from Argos and GPS tracking data , 2012 .

[11]  Evan Richardson,et al.  Age and Sex Composition of Seals Killed by Polar Bears in the Eastern Beaufort Sea , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Michael J. Plank,et al.  Lévy or not? analysing positional data from animal movement paths , 2013 .

[13]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? , 2008, Ecology.

[14]  W. Zucchini,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R , 2009 .

[15]  David W. Sims,et al.  A new approach for objective identification of turns and steps in organism movement data relevant to random walk modelling , 2013 .

[16]  Benjamin M. Bolker,et al.  Ecological Models and Data in R , 2008 .

[17]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[18]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[20]  S. Benhamou HOW MANY ANIMALS REALLY DO THE LÉVY WALK , 2007 .

[21]  Marie Auger-Méthé,et al.  Sampling rate and misidentification of Lévy and non-Lévy movement paths: comment. , 2011, Ecology.

[22]  Evan Richardson,et al.  Influence of intraspecific competition on the distribution of a wide‐ranging, non‐territorial carnivore , 2014 .

[23]  P. Turchin Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[24]  Sergei Petrovskii,et al.  Comment on : “ Lévy walks evolve through interaction between movement and environmental complexity ” , 2011 .

[25]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Lévy flight and Brownian search patterns of a free-ranging predator reflect different prey field characteristics. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[26]  H. Eugene Stanley,et al.  Anomalous diffusion and multifractality enhance mating encounters in the ocean , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  Brownian motion or Lévy walk? Stepping towards an extended statistical mechanics for animal locomotion , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  Michael J Plank,et al.  Distinguishing between Lévy walks and strong alternative models: comment. , 2014, Ecology.

[29]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Homing in green turtles Chelonia mydas: oceanic currents act as a constraint rather than as an information source , 2006 .

[30]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[31]  I. Macdonald,et al.  Numerical Maximisation of Likelihood: A Neglected Alternative to EM? , 2014 .

[32]  Magnus Andersen,et al.  Movements of two Svalbard polar bears recorded using geographical positioning system satellite transmitters , 2008, Polar Biology.

[33]  Andrew S. Knell,et al.  Classifying area-restricted search (ARS) using a partial sum approach , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[34]  D. Haydon,et al.  Multiple movement modes by large herbivores at multiple spatiotemporal scales , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  I. Stirling,et al.  IMMOBILIZATION OF POLAR BEARS (URSUS MARITIMUS) WITH TELAZOL® IN THE CANADIAN ARCTIC , 1989, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[36]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Random walk models in biology , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[37]  Ian Stirling,et al.  Seasonal, sexual and anatomical variability in the adipose tissue of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) , 2006 .

[38]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Assessing Lévy walks as models of animal foraging , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Foraging success of biological Lévy flights recorded in situ , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Overturning conclusions of Lévy flight movement patterns by fishing boats and foraging animals. , 2011, Ecology.

[41]  M. Plank,et al.  Optimal foraging: Lévy pattern or process? , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  M. Moreau,et al.  Intermittent search strategies , 2011, 1104.0639.

[43]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Flexible and practical modeling of animal telemetry data: hidden Markov models and extensions. , 2012, Ecology.

[44]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Efficiency of area-concentrated searching behaviour in a continuous patchy environment* , 1992 .

[45]  Ian Stirling,et al.  Habitat preferences of polar bears in the western Canadian Arctic in late winter and spring , 1993, Polar Record.

[46]  Torkild Tveraa,et al.  USING FIRST‐PASSAGE TIME IN THE ANALYSIS OF AREA‐RESTRICTED SEARCH AND HABITAT SELECTION , 2003 .

[47]  G. Odell,et al.  Swarms of Predators Exhibit "Preytaxis" if Individual Predators Use Area-Restricted Search , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[48]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM‐WALK ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[49]  Edward A Codling,et al.  Diffusion about the mean drift location in a biased random walk. , 2010, Ecology.

[50]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  Identifying leatherback turtle foraging behaviour from satellite telemetry using a switching state-space model , 2007 .

[51]  Sabrina Fossette,et al.  Marine animal behaviour: neglecting ocean currents can lead us up the wrong track , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Incorrect Likelihood Methods Were Used to Infer Scaling Laws of Marine Predator Search Behaviour , 2012, PloS one.

[53]  Arild O. Gautestad Animal space use: distinguishing a two‐level superposition of scale‐specific walks from scale‐free Lévy walk , 2013 .

[54]  Michael J. Plank,et al.  Turn designation, sampling rate and the misidentification of power laws in movement path data using maximum likelihood estimates , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[55]  E A Codling,et al.  Sampling rate effects on measurements of correlated and biased random walks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.