In‐situ CO2 monitoring network evaluation and design: A criterion based on atmospheric CO2 variability

[1] Estimates of surface fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2) can be derived from atmospheric CO2 concentration measurements through the solution of an inverse problem, but the sparseness of the existing CO2 monitoring network is often cited as a main limiting factor in constraining fluxes. Existing methods for assessing or designing monitoring networks either primarily rely on expert knowledge, or are sensitive to the large number of modeling choices and assumptions inherent to the solution of inverse problems. This study proposes a monitoring network evaluation and design approach based on the quantification of the spatial variability in modeled atmospheric CO2. The approach is used to evaluate the 2004–2008 North American network expansion and to create two hypothetical further expansions. The less stringent expansion guarantees a monitoring tower within one correlation length (CL) of each location (1 CL), requiring an additional eight towers relative to 2008. The more stringent network includes a tower within one half of a CL (½ CL) and requires 35 towers beyond the 1 CL network. The two proposed networks are evaluated against the network in 2008, which temporarily had the most continuous monitoring sites in North America thanks to the Mid-Continent Intensive project. Evaluation using a synthetic data inversion shows a marked improvement in the ability to constrain both continental- and biome-scale fluxes, especially in areas that are currently under-sampled. The proposed approach is flexible, computationally inexpensive, and provides a quantitative design tool that can be used in concert with existing tools to inform atmospheric monitoring needs.

[1]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Ant Algorithms for Discrete Optimization , 1999, Artificial Life.

[2]  Ralph M. Rotty,et al.  Atmospheric carbon dioxide : Possible consequences of future fossil fuel use , 1978 .

[3]  P. Kitanidis.  Quasi‐Linear Geostatistical Theory for Inversing , 1995 .

[4]  Taro Takahashi,et al.  Net sea-air CO2 flux over the global oceans: An improved estimate based on the sea-air pCO2 difference , 1999 .

[5]  Carl Ekdahl,et al.  Atmospheric carbon dioxide variations at the South Pole , 1976 .

[6]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: Terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison , 2012 .

[7]  Anna M. Michalak,et al.  Global monthly averaged CO2 fluxes recovered using a geostatistical inverse modeling approach: 1. Results using atmospheric measurements , 2008 .

[8]  Peter J. Rayner,et al.  Optimizing CO 2 observing networks in the presence of model error: results from TransCom 3 , 2003 .

[9]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe - Part 1: mapping the atmospheric CO2 signals , 2006 .

[10]  R. Weiss,et al.  Quantifying greenhouse-gas emissions from atmospheric measurements: a critical reality check for climate legislation , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Tingjun Zhang,et al.  Amount and timing of permafrost carbon release in response to climate warming , 2011 .

[12]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[13]  M. Uliasz,et al.  Seeing the forest through the trees: Recovering large‐scale carbon flux biases in the midst of small‐scale variability , 2009 .

[14]  J. Randerson,et al.  Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004 , 2006 .

[15]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[16]  Thomas Kaminski,et al.  Assimilation and Network Design , 2008 .

[17]  P. Tans,et al.  A geostatistical approach to surface flux estimation of atmospheric trace gases , 2004 .

[18]  Shamil Maksyutov,et al.  Incremental approach to the optimal network design for CO2 surface source inversion , 2002 .

[19]  Sonia Martínez,et al.  Coverage control for mobile sensing networks , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Variational data assimilation for atmospheric CO2 , 2006 .

[21]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The contribution of terrestrial sources and sinks to trends in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1997 .

[22]  Gregg Marland,et al.  A 1° × 1° distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture, 1950–1990 , 1996 .

[23]  Taro Takahashi,et al.  Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models , 2002, Nature.

[24]  R. Martin,et al.  Interannual and seasonal variability of biomass burning emissions constrained by satellite observations , 2003 .

[25]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  Optimizing the CO2 observing network for constraining sources and sinks , 1996 .

[26]  Thomas Kaminski,et al.  On aggregation errors in atmospheric transport inversions , 2001 .

[27]  Melinda Marquis,et al.  Carbon Crucible , 2008, Science.

[28]  Kevin R. Gurney,et al.  On error estimation in atmospheric CO2 inversions , 2002 .

[29]  Dorit Hammerling,et al.  Mapping of CO2 at high spatiotemporal resolution using satellite observations: Global distributions from OCO‐2 , 2012 .

[30]  A. E. Schuh,et al.  Network design for mesoscale inversions of CO2 sources and sinks , 2012 .

[31]  Gene F. Franklin,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems , 1986 .

[32]  John C. Lin,et al.  A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model , 2003 .

[33]  S. Randolph Kawa,et al.  A global evaluation of the regional spatial variability of column integrated CO2 distributions , 2008 .

[34]  B. Law,et al.  Sensitivity of a subregional scale atmospheric inverse CO2 modeling framework to boundary conditions , 2010 .

[35]  Jordan G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2 , 2005 .

[36]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[37]  Carl Ekdahl,et al.  Atmospheric carbon dioxide variations at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii , 1976 .

[38]  László Haszpra,et al.  On the representativeness of carbon dioxide measurements , 1999 .

[39]  Kevin R. Gurney,et al.  Interannual variations in continental‐scale net carbon exchange and sensitivity to observing networks estimated from atmospheric CO2 inversions for the period 1980 to 2005 , 2008 .

[40]  Colm Sweeney,et al.  Constraining the CO 2 budget of the corn belt: exploring uncertainties from the assumptions in a mesoscale inverse system , 2011 .

[41]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Seven years of recent European net terrestrial carbon dioxide exchange constrained by atmospheric observations , 2010 .

[42]  Jorge L. Sarmiento,et al.  Optimal sampling of the atmosphere for purpose of inverse modeling: A model study , 2000 .

[43]  F. Chevallier,et al.  Four-dimensional data assimilation of atmospheric CO2 using AIRS observations , 2009 .

[44]  Thomas Kaminski,et al.  Observing the continental-scale carbon balance: assessment of sampling complementarity and redundancy in a terrestrial assimilation system by means of quantitative network design , 2012 .

[45]  A. Manning,et al.  The challenge of estimating regional trace gas emissions from atmospheric observations , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[46]  Pieter P. Tans,et al.  A feasible Global Carbon Cycle Observing System: a plan to decipher today's carbon cycle based on observations , 1996 .

[47]  Kevin Schaefer,et al.  Global monthly averaged CO2 fluxes recovered using a geostatistical inverse modeling approach: 2. Results including auxiliary environmental data , 2008 .

[48]  C. Sweeney,et al.  Global sea-air CO2 flux based on climatological surface ocean pCO2, and seasonal biological and temperature effects , 2002 .

[49]  Montserrat Fuentes,et al.  Bayesian entropy for spatial sampling design of environmental data , 2007, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[50]  John C. Lin,et al.  North American CO 2 exchange: inter-comparison of modeled estimates with results from a fine-scale atmospheric inversion , 2011 .

[51]  Steven Pawson,et al.  Global CO2 transport simulations using meteorological data from the NASA data assimilation system , 2004 .

[52]  J. Canadell,et al.  Systematic long-term observations of the global carbon cycle. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  K. Davis,et al.  Large amplitude spatial and temporal gradients in atmospheric boundary layer CO2mole fractions detected with a tower-based network in the U.S. upper Midwest , 2012 .

[54]  Nicholas C. Parazoo,et al.  A regional high-resolution carbon flux inversion of North America for 2004 , 2010 .

[55]  Vineet Yadav,et al.  Regional-scale geostatistical inverse modeling of North American CO 2 fluxes: a synthetic data study , 2009 .