Ratings for spectrum: Impacts of TV viewership on TV whitespace

Current TV whitespace regulations mainly benefit rural areas where large amounts of TV whitespace exist. Thus, the spectrum scarcity problem is yet to be addressed in urban locations, where it is most experienced. To further improve the spectrum efficiency, a new framework for cognitive radio network operation is presented, which can coexist with current broadcast TV networks. Through geographical evaluations based on distribution of TV towers and population dynamics, it is shown that by leveraging the TV viewership statistics, 5.6-7.7-fold increase in available channels can be provided to mobile users in populated areas such as New York City. Furthermore, daily dynamics of TV viewership can be exploited to provide up to 96 MHz additional bandwidth during prime time and 162-228 MHz additional bandwidth during non-peak hours. The additional TV spectrum can provide additional channel capacities in both rural and urban areas. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that analyzes TV whitespace availability based on TV viewership statistics in space and time.

[1]  Dimitrios D. Vergados,et al.  A Survey on the Successive Interference Cancellation Performance for Single-Antenna and Multiple-Antenna OFDM Systems , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[2]  Soung Chang Liew,et al.  Blind Known Interference Cancellation , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Mining Spectrum Usage Data: A Large-Scale Spectrum Measurement Study , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[5]  Kate Harrison,et al.  How Much White-Space Capacity Is There? , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[6]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Breaking Spectrum Gridlock With Cognitive Radios: An Information Theoretic Perspective , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A survey on spectrum management in cognitive radio networks , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Tanim M. Taher,et al.  Long-term spectral occupancy findings in Chicago , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[9]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks Using Multidimensional Correlations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Femtocells: Past, Present, and Future , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  K. Ramchandran,et al.  Detecting primary receivers for cognitive radio applications , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[12]  Carl Wijting,et al.  Device-to-device communication as an underlay to LTE-advanced networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  LTE-Advanced and the evolution to Beyond 4G (B4G) systems , 2014, Phys. Commun..

[14]  J. Hoekstra,et al.  The international encyclopedia of communication, Volume IV , 2008 .

[15]  Andreas Achtzehn,et al.  TV White Space in Europe , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[16]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Seeing the bigger picture: Context-aware regulations , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[17]  Kalle Ruttik,et al.  Effect of secondary transmission on primary pilot carriers in overlay cognitive radios , 2013 .

[18]  Xianming Qing,et al.  Spectrum Survey in Singapore: Occupancy Measurements and Analyses , 2008, 2008 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom 2008).

[19]  Dan McCloskey,et al.  Chicago spectrum occupancy measurements & analysis and a long-term studies proposal , 2006, TAPAS '06.