Attitudes of 47 mothers of pediatric oncology patients toward genetic testing for cancer predisposition.

PURPOSE To assess attitudes toward testing for cancer susceptibility genes, we interviewed mothers of pediatric oncology patients about their cancer causation theories, interest in hypothetical predisposition testing for themselves and their healthy children, and anticipated impact of testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS The subjects were 47 mothers of two or more living children, one of whom was 6 to 24 months postdiagnosis of cancer. Potential risks and benefits of hypothetical genetic predisposition testing for cancer susceptibility were described. A semistructured interview assessed the following: (1) recall of discussions with the pediatric oncologist about the possible role of heredity in causing the child's cancer; (2) mothers' personal theories of the etiology of their child's cancer; (3) family cancer history; (4) interest in genetic predisposition testing for themselves and unaffected (cancer-free) children; and (5) expected sequelae of testing. RESULTS If genetic cancer predisposition tests were available, 51% of mothers would test themselves and 42% would test healthy children, even with no medical benefit. With established medical benefit, an additional 36% of mothers would seek testing for themselves and another 49% would test their healthy children. Interest in cancer predisposition testing among mothers extended far beyond those with significant family histories of cancer. Most mothers would consider minor children's wishes in the decision about testing and would tell children under age 18 their test results. CONCLUSION As increasing numbers of cancer susceptibility genes are identified, parents of pediatric oncology patients may be receptive to opportunities to test themselves and their healthy children. Counseling will be important to aid in decisions about testing. Research is essential to evaluate the long-term impact of predisposition testing.

[1]  Genetic Testing for Children and Adolescents , 1995 .

[2]  C. Eng,et al.  Mutations of the RET proto-oncogene in the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndromes and Hirschsprung disease , 1994, Journal of Cell Science.

[3]  P. Reilly,et al.  Genetic testing for children and adolescents. Who decides? , 1994, JAMA.

[4]  D. Housman,et al.  WT1 mutations contribute to abnormal genital system development and hereditary Wilms' tumour , 1991, Nature.

[5]  Raymond White Inherited cancer genes , 1992 .

[6]  D. Craufurd,et al.  UPTAKE OF PRESYMPTOMATIC PREDICTIVE TESTING FOR HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE , 1989, The Lancet.

[7]  Stephen H. Friend,et al.  A human DNA segment with properties of the gene that predisposes to retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma , 1986, Nature.

[8]  M. Hayden,et al.  Opinion: predictive testing for Huntington disease in childhood: challenges and implications. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  Sandi Wiggins,et al.  The Psychological Consequences of Predictive Testing for Huntington’s Disease , 1992 .

[10]  M. Hayden,et al.  Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. , 1992, American journal of medical genetics.

[11]  S. Sheps,et al.  The psychological consequences of predictive testing for Huntington's disease. Canadian Collaborative Study of Predictive Testing. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  J. McPherson,et al.  Identification of deletion mutations and three new genes at the familial polyposis locus , 1991, Cell.

[13]  A. B. Hollingshead,et al.  Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study. , 1958 .

[14]  L. Strong,et al.  Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. , 1990, Science.

[15]  L. Went Ethical issues policy statement on Huntington's disease molecular genetics predictive test. International Huntington Association. World Federation of Neurology. , 1990, Journal of medical genetics.