Effects of gender on presence and virtual driver perception in driving simulators

Driving simulators are routinely used by researchers to study driver behavior. However, (limited) previous research has shown that the user gender may modify the perception, or even usability of these devices. For example, [Mourant 00] shows that men and women have different sensitivity to simulator sickness. These differences are liable to introduce biases in behavior studies and other virtual reality applications such as driver training. The validity of driving simulators depends on a number of factors, such as platform dynamics or 3D-database realism. In our research, we focus on simulated traffic behavior. Although there is a huge literature on traffic simulation, its main purpose has been to study capacity, security or recently environmental impact of traffic. Hence, the use of traffic simulation models in virtual reality devices, where the entities interact with users, has not been validated. In this paper, we study how users perceive virtual entities, focusing on the role of gender. An experiment has been developed to evaluate the users perception of the driving simulator and of the simulated drivers, using questionnaires and user behavior data. We use the well-known presence concept - developed by [Witmer 98] - to assess the overall validity, and an ad hoc questionnaire to assess the virtual entities behavior credibility. We propose a methodology including a set of tools and data processing units enabling inter-human and virtual agents behavior comparison. We have found very few significant correlation between driving traces, the perception of the virtual environment and background questionnaires, including gender, driving behavior (see [Reason 90]), and immersion tendency, which seems to indicate that the Archisim driving simulator does not induce gender bias, and that the virtual drivers replicate in the same way men and women behavior. This study calls for further evaluation of the impact of age on the use of driving simulators.

[1]  Brad Brubaker,et al.  Use of landmarks in cognitive mapping: Gender differences in self report versus performance , 1998 .

[2]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[3]  T. Caliński,et al.  A dendrite method for cluster analysis , 1974 .

[4]  Thomas W. Schubert.  The sense of presence in virtual environments , 2003 .

[5]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.

[6]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Alexis Champion.  Mécanisme de coordination multi-agent fondé sur des jeux : application à la simulation comportementale de trafic routier en situation de carrefour , 2003 .

[8]  Stéphane Espié,et al.  Behavioral Simulation: Towards High-Density Network Traffic Studies , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driving simulator validation for speed research. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Philip Chan,et al.  Toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space , 2007, Intell. Data Anal..

[11]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  J. Pratt,et al.  Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition , 2007, Psychological science.

[13]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[14]  S Stradling,et al.  Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? , 1990, Ergonomics.

[15]  Piyushimita Thakuriah,et al.  Privacy and Gender: Reviewing women's attitudes towards privacy in the context of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and Location Based Services (LBS) , 2011 .

[16]  Jeanne H. Brockmyer,et al.  The Development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A Measure of Engagement in Video Game Playing: Response to Reviews , 2009, Interacting with computers.

[17]  William M. Rand,et al.  Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods , 1971 .

[18]  John Patrick,et al.  Training: Research and practice. , 1992 .

[19]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[20]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Simulator Sickness in a Virtual Environments Driving Simulator , 2000 .

[21]  Nicolas Sabouret,et al.  A Method for Semi-automatic Explicitation of Agent's Behavior - Application to the Study of an Immersive Driving Simulator , 2014, ICAART.