Automatic location of vertebrae in digitized videofluoroscopic images of the lumbar spine.

Back pain is a widespread problem, and the disability it engenders continues to grow, despite efforts to contain it. A major problem in the diagnosis and management of back pain is the assessment of the degree to which mechanical factors play a part. Of considerable importance in understanding these mechanical factors is being able to quantify how the human spine actually moves in vivo. Digitized videofluoroscopy is currently the only practical method available for studying spinal motion in vivo at the segmental level. Low-dose, planar motion X-rays of the spine are captured on videotape and subsequently digitized for analysis. Until now, vertebrae in the digitized images were identified and marked manually as a basis for calculating intervertebral kinematics. This paper describes a procedure for automatically identifying the vertebrae in the motion sequences. The process increases objectivity and repeatability, and significantly reduces the manual effort required in locating the vertebrae prior to calculating the kinematics. The technique has been applied to images of a calibrated model and the results are promising. In-plane rotations may be calculated to an accuracy of at least 1 degree. Repeated analysis reveals standard deviations of less than 0.5 degree for intervertebral rotations and less than 0.25 mm for translations.

[1]  A O Frank,et al.  Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment. , 1990, BMJ.

[2]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Measurement of back and spinal mobility. , 1986, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  A Breen,et al.  An image processing method for spine kinematics-preliminary studies. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  J. A. Parker,et al.  Measurement of Torsion from Multitemporal Images of the Eye Using Digital Signal Processing Techniques , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  C. L. Nash,et al.  Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  Accurate roentgenographic determination of lumbar flexion-extension. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  A Breen,et al.  A digital videofluoroscopic technique for spine kinematics. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[8]  Tanz Ss,et al.  Motion of the lumbar spine; a roentgenologic study. , 1953 .

[9]  C. L. Nash,et al.  A study of vertebral rotation. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  B Drerup,et al.  Principles of measurement of vertebral rotation from frontal projections of the pedicles. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  D. Hill,et al.  A Comparison of Four Computerized Methods for Measuring Vertebral Rotation , 1990, Spine.

[12]  C. Morandi,et al.  Registration of Translated and Rotated Images Using Finite Fourier Transforms , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  C Simonis.  Parallel calculation and analysis of spine kinematic parameters using videofluoroscopy and image processing. , 1994 .

[14]  William C. Olivero,et al.  A Risk/Benefit Analysis of Spinal Manipulation Therapy for Relief of Lumbar or Cervical Pain , 1993 .

[15]  M. Pearcy.  Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[16]  B. Brown.  Proceedings of the Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers , 1975 .

[17]  M. Panjabi,et al.  An Analysis of Errors in Kinematic Parameters Associated with in Vivo Functional Radiographs , 1992, Spine.

[18]  Ac Breen.  The measurement of the kinematics of the human spine using videofluoroscopy and image processing. , 1991 .

[19]  L. Hibbard,et al.  Computed three‐dimensional reconstruction of median‐eminence capillary modules: Image alignment and correlation , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[20]  Roberto Cusani,et al.  A correlation based technique for shift, scale, and rotation independent object identification , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[21]  Joachim H. Nagel,et al.  Registration of high-resolution images of the retina , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[23]  B Drerup,et al.  Improvements in measuring vertebral rotation from the projections of the pedicles. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Robert Allen,et al.  Determination of instantaneous centres of rotation: Parallel application in spine kinematics , 1992, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  Robert Allen,et al.  Image presentations for spinal kinematic analysis using digital videofluoroscopy , 1989 .

[26]  M A FALCONER,et al.  Plain radiography in intraspinal protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disks: A correlation with operative findings , 1949, The British journal of surgery.

[27]  J. H. Dripps,et al.  Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , 1989 .

[28]  A C Breen,et al.  Gray scale range and the marking of vertebral coordinates on digitized radiographic images. , 1994, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[29]  C D Ray.  Clinical neurosurgery as it relates to the lumbar spine: what it does versus what it says. , 1991 .

[30]  I A Stokes,et al.  Back Surface Curvature and Measurement of Lumbar Spinal Motion , 1987, Spine.

[31]  Wyatt Page,et al.  Bone movement analysis from computer processing of X-ray cinematic video images , 1992 .

[32]  D B Allan,et al.  An historical perspective on low back pain and disability. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[33]  Robert Allen,et al.  An Image Processing Technique for the Radiographic Assessment of Vertebral Derangements. , 1989 .