What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?

This study tested the hypothesis that even the simplest cognitive tasks require the storage of information in working memory (WM), distorting any information that was previously stored in WM. Experiment 1 tested this hypothesis by requiring observers to perform a simple letter discrimination task while they were holding a single orientation in WM. We predicted that performing the task on the interposed letter stimulus would cause the orientation memory to become less precise and more categorical compared to when the letter was absent or when it was present but could be ignored. This prediction was confirmed. Experiment 2 tested the modality specificity of this effect by replacing the visual letter discrimination task with an auditory pitch discrimination task. Unlike the interposed visual stimulus, the interposed auditory stimulus produced little or no disruption of WM, consistent with the use of modality-specific representations. Thus, performing a simple visual discrimination task, but not a simple auditory discrimination task, distorts information about a single feature being maintained in visual WM. We suggest that the interposed task eliminates information stored within the focus of attention, leaving behind a WM representation outside the focus of attention that is relatively imprecise and categorical.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Interference within the Focus of Attention: Working Memory Tasks Reflect More than Temporary Maintenance We Thank Candice Morey for Sharing Her Visual Arrays Tasks with Our Lab. We Additionally Thank , 2022 .

[3]  R. Marois,et al.  Distinct Capacity Limits for Attention and Working Memory , 2006, Psychological science.

[4]  N. Cowan,et al.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  J. Movshon,et al.  A new perceptual illusion reveals mechanisms of sensory decoding , 2007, Nature.

[6]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Visual working memory is disrupted by covert verbal retrieval , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Selective Maintenance in Visual Working Memory Does Not Require Sustained Visual Attention , 2012 .

[8]  David W. Sutterer,et al.  The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  K. Oberauer Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Janneke F. M. Jehee,et al.  Sensory uncertainty decoded from visual cortex predicts behavior , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Timothy J. Ricker,et al.  The Nature of Short-Term Consolidation in Visual Working Memory , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Frank Tong,et al.  Accounting for Stimulus-Specific Variation in Precision Reveals a Discrete Capacity Limit in Visual Working Memory , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Anna C. Nobre,et al.  Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Evie Vergauwe,et al.  Categorical Working Memory Representations Are Used in Delayed Estimation of Continuous Colors , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  S. Luck,et al.  Interactions between visual working memory representations , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Xue-Xin Wei,et al.  A Bayesian observer model constrained by efficient coding can explain 'anti-Bayesian' percepts , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Stokes ‘Activity-silent’ working memory in prefrontal cortex: a dynamic coding framework , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Valerie M. Beck,et al.  Simultaneous Control of Attention by Multiple Working Memory Representations , 2012, Psychological science.

[23]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[24]  Evie Vergauwe,et al.  Do Mental Processes Share a Domain-General Resource? , 2010, Psychological science.

[25]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  Reactivation of latent working memories with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2016, Science.

[26]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Working memory in primate sensory systems , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Luck,et al.  Dissociable Decoding of Spatial Attention and Working Memory from EEG Oscillations and Sustained Potentials , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  M. Tsodyks,et al.  Synaptic Theory of Working Memory , 2008, Science.

[30]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  Why some colors appear more memorable than others: A model combining categories and particulars in color working memory. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[34]  G. Woodman,et al.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .

[36]  Alessandra S. Souza,et al.  The contributions of visual and central attention to visual working memory , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  R. Jong,et al.  Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Candice C Morey,et al.  Visual short-term memory always requires general attention , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[39]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation , 2007 .

[40]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[42]  Stephen M. Emrich,et al.  Attention Mediates the Flexible Allocation of Visual Working Memory Resources , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time and cognitive load in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Won Mok Shim,et al.  Interference from filled delays on visual change detection. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[45]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not , 2022 .

[46]  P. Goldman-Rakic Cellular basis of working memory , 1995, Neuron.

[47]  A. Nobre,et al.  Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[48]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[50]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual Search Remains Efficient when Visual Working Memory is Full , 2001, Psychological science.

[51]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[53]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[54]  Trafton Drew,et al.  Delineating resetting and updating in visual working memory based on the object-to-representation correspondence , 2018, Neuropsychologia.