Mapping the Margins: Navigating the Ecologies of Domestic Violence Service Provision

Work addressing the negative impacts of domestic violence on victim-survivors and service providers has slowly been contributing to the HCI discourse. However, work discussing the necessary, pre-emptive steps for researchers to enter these spaces sensitively and considerately, largely remains opaque. Heavily-politicised specialisms that are imbued with conflicting values and practices, such as domestic violence service delivery can be especially difficult to navigate. In this paper, we report on a mixed methods study consisting of interviews, a design dialogue and an ideation workshop with domestic violence service providers to explore the potential of an online service directory to support their work. Through this three-stage research process, we were able to characterise this unique service delivery landscape and identify tensions in services' access, understandings of technologies and working practices. Drawing from our findings, we discuss opportunities for researchers to work with and sustain complex information ecologies in sensitive settings.

[1]  T. Cain The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice , 2014 .

[2]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Participation: basic concepts and research challenges , 2012, PDC '12.

[3]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  Local Governance under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’ , 2012 .

[4]  C. DiSalvo,et al.  Design and the Construction of Publics , 2009, Design Issues.

[5]  Ann Light,et al.  Practices of readiness: punctuation, poise and the contingencies of participatory design , 2018, PDC.

[6]  Joonas Koivumaa,et al.  “Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in just Five Days” , 2017 .

[7]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  App Movement: A Platform for Community Commissioning of Mobile Applications , 2016, CHI.

[8]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  Exploring Trust in Digital Civics , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[9]  Erin K. McBride The multi-agency response to children living with domestic abuse , 2018 .

[10]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  Reflective Practicum: A Framework of Sensitising Concepts to Design for Transformative Reflection , 2017, CHI.

[11]  Armine Ishkanian Neoliberalism and violence: The Big Society and the changing politics of domestic violence in England , 2014 .

[12]  Rob Comber,et al.  Between Grassroots and the Hierarchy: Lessons Learned from the Design of a Public Services Directory , 2018, CHI.

[13]  Sue Prosser,et al.  Action research: politics, ethics and participation. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[15]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Managing technology use and learning in nonprofit community organizations: methodological challenges and opportunities , 2007, CHIMIT '07.

[16]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Digital portraits: photo-sharing after domestic violence , 2013, CHI.

[17]  Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed,et al.  Working with Women in ICTD , 2017, ICTD.

[18]  A. Evers,et al.  The Third Sector in Europe , 2006 .

[19]  E. McDaniel Women, Violence, and Social Change , 1992 .

[20]  G. Hague Interagency work and domestic violence in the UK , 1998 .

[21]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[22]  Kevin Corder Acquiring New Technology , 2001 .

[23]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Contextmapping: experiences from practice , 2005 .

[24]  Rob Comber,et al.  FeedFinder: A Location-Mapping Mobile Application for Breastfeeding Women , 2015, CHI.

[25]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Progressive localism and the construction of political alternatives , 2012 .

[26]  David Wilson,et al.  Local Government in the United Kingdom , 1994 .

[27]  H. Wollmann,et al.  Public and Social Services in Europe , 2016 .

[28]  L. Simmonds,et al.  The impact of local commissioning on victim services in England and Wales: An empirical study , 2018, International Review of Victimology.

[29]  L. Winner DO ARTIFACTS HAVE (cid:1) POLITICS? , 2022 .

[30]  Maeve O’Grady,et al.  The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice , 2013 .

[31]  Nicola Dell,et al.  Digital Technologies and Intimate Partner Violence , 2017, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[32]  P. Crawshaw,et al.  The Impact of Welfare Reform in the North East , 2013 .

[33]  T. Jung Foundations in the U.K.: Organizations and Nations in a State of Flux , 2018 .

[34]  Budi Arief,et al.  Sensible Privacy: How We Can Protect Domestic Violence Survivors Without Facilitating Misuse , 2014, WPES.

[35]  Tara Matthews,et al.  Stories from Survivors: Privacy & Security Practices when Coping with Intimate Partner Abuse , 2017, CHI.

[36]  Brandy Dieterle,et al.  Designing smartphone apps for at risk populations: domestic violence survivors and user experience , 2015, SIGDOC.

[37]  T. Brooks Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[38]  G. Jan van Helden,et al.  Public sector governance and accountability , 2013 .

[39]  A. Madanipour,et al.  Localism and Neo-Liberal Governmentality , 2013 .

[40]  Kim Haugbølle,et al.  Competitive dialogue: Driving innovation through procurement? , 2015 .

[41]  John F. McEldowney,et al.  Delivering Public Services in the United Kingdom in a Period of Austerity , 2016 .

[42]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Digital civics , 2015, Interactions.

[43]  Mary Mcateer Action Research in Education , 2013 .

[44]  J. Clarke The Local Government of the United Kingdom , 2008 .

[45]  Kim Halskov,et al.  12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases , 2012 .

[46]  Nicola Dell,et al.  “A Stalker's Paradise”: How Intimate Partner Abusers Exploit Technology , 2018, CHI.

[47]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[48]  T. Barnwell,et al.  The collective articulation of issues as design practice , 2011 .

[49]  Andy Luse,et al.  GuardDV: a proximity detection device for homeless survivors of domestic violence , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[50]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice , 2001 .

[51]  G. Johnstone Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates , 2001 .

[52]  Lynn Dombrowski,et al.  Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[53]  Gillian R. Hayes The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction , 2011, TCHI.