Development of personalized learning objects for training adult educators of special groups

Purpose – The paper seeks to provide personalized learning objects to adults’ educators of special groups (AESG) in a technology-enhanced learning environment. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents a definition of specific criteria by which personalization of learning objects is effected. An analysis under the scope of adult education and multicultural education is performed, resulting in the development of tools and a clear path leading to more efficient personalization of learning objects of AESG within an e-learning environment. Findings – Personalization of learning objects for AESG can be achieved to a much greater extent when the element of compatibility between educator and learner defines content, preceding and mapping with presentation factors. Research limitations/implications – As the research is focused on AESG, the key notion of compatibility may not be applicable to adult educators of the general public. Practical implications – The paper offers a path through which learning management systems can provide improved personalization of learning objects addressed to AESG. Originality/value – The introduction of compatibility between educator and learner as the key element of the educator’s profile in order to provide personalized learning objects addressed to AESG opens up new territory. The paper is also useful to the developers of learning management systems addressed to any group with special attributes which strongly affect the learner’s profile.

[1]  Florida A Karani Adult and Continuing Education in Kenya , 2003 .

[2]  David Jaques,et al.  Learning in Groups , 1984 .

[3]  Linda Ziegahn ‘Talk’ about culture online: The potential for transformation , 2001 .

[4]  Elavie Ndura,et al.  Reflections of teachers’ culture in the classroom: Beginning to see and hear , 2006 .

[5]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[6]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Extending eductional metadata schemas to describe adaptive learning resources , 2001, HYPERTEXT '01.

[7]  S. Brookfield Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning , 1986 .

[8]  Declan Dagger,et al.  eLearning Without Borders - A Support Framework for Reusing Educational Strategies , 2005 .

[9]  Patricia Cranton Planning Instruction for Adult Learners , 1989 .

[10]  Maria Pavlis Korres On the requirements of Learning Object Metadata for adults' educators of special groups , 2007, MTSR.

[11]  M. Knowles The adult learner : a neglected species , 1979 .

[12]  Ronald R. Schmeck,et al.  Strategies and Styles of Learning , 1988 .

[13]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Adults as learners , 1981 .

[14]  Peter J. Smith,et al.  Strategies for accommodating individuals' styles and preferences in flexible learning programmes , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  E. Goffman Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[16]  R. Felder,et al.  Understanding Student Differences , 2005 .

[17]  P. Jarvis Adult and Continuing Education: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[18]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Navigation Support: From Adaptive Hypermedia to the Adaptive Web and Beyond , 2004, PsychNology J..

[19]  M. Knowles,et al.  The Adult Learner , 2020, The Department Chair.

[20]  Simone Conceição-Runlee Faculty lived experiences in the online environment , 2001 .

[21]  Declan O'Sullivan,et al.  Applying Adaptive Hypermedia Techniques to Semantic Web Service Composition , 2003 .

[22]  Ken Beatty,et al.  Describing and Enhancing Collaboration at the Computer , 2002 .

[23]  Regina O. Smith Working With Difference in Online Collaborative Groups , 2005 .

[24]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[25]  Susan M. Montgomery Addressing diverse learning styles through the use of multimedia , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[26]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1962 .

[27]  S. Brookfield Becoming a critically reflective teacher , 1995 .

[28]  M. Knowles Andragogy in action , 1984 .

[29]  Penny Lacey Challenging Prejudice through Education , 1991 .

[30]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  The Implications of Learning Styles for Training and Development: A Discussion of the Matching Hypothesis , 1996 .

[31]  L. Ziegahn,et al.  Critical Reflection on Cultural Difference in the Computer Conference , 2005 .

[32]  David Wiley,et al.  Learning object design and sequencing theory , 2000 .

[33]  M. Knowles The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy , 1970 .

[34]  R. Schmeck,et al.  Learning strategies and learning styles , 1988 .

[35]  J. Mezirow Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning , 1991 .

[36]  Paolo Freire Pedagogy of the oppressed, New York (Herder & Herder) 1970. , 1970 .

[37]  Sally Tomlinson,et al.  A sociology of special education , 1982 .